• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Man Who Stopped The Spread Of Communism in Europe in 1920.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Pilsudski, The Man Who Stopped The Spread Of Communism in Europe in 1920. Maximilian Stella Period D March 8, 20001 (Stella, 1) Marshall Jozef Pilsudski, was one of the most important persons in preventing the spread of Communism throughout Europe after World War I. His biggest success was the victory over the Bolshevik forces in 1920. The victory over the Bolsheviks had arose after several important turning points in Polish history. One of them was the meeting in Versaille where the world- powers met after World War I to discuss several important issues concerning the new borders in Europe. Among those countries were France, England and the U.S. They decided to recreate Poland as a country. Poland had got its own government and land after 123 years of foreign rule by Austria, Prussia and Russia, which finally had to give up after their partitions of Poland in the 1790's. In the developing country great personalities played an important role. Among them there was one of the greatest Poles that ever lived -Marshall Jozef Klemens Pilsudski. ...read more.

Middle

Britain and France closely followed Pilsudski's actions and were very nervous about the Bolshevik offense. Especially, because the western countries were weakened after the war and were very afraid of the threat of spreading of communism from the east to the west. The feared moment took place on June 5th when Soviet broke the Polish defense line near Sulechow. The British minister Horace Rumbold blamed Pilsudski for not taking help from the allied forces and that he tried to act as a hero and show the world what a great leader he was. Pilsudski's opinion was though that the generals of the allied forces wouldn't be able to communicate with the Polish soldiers because of the different languages. (Stella, 3) He believed that it was time for Poland to prove that it is a strong country again, ready to manage their problems by themselves. Maurice Henkey, a British politician was sent to Warsaw with an order to convince the Polish commanders of the profits with having a British or a French Head-of-the-army. The Poles objected. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, "Le Figaro'' from August 19 writes that French tactics had been used in the battle by General Weygand. Another paper, "L'Echo de Paris'' from August 21 informs about a Polish victory but doesn't mention Pilsudski at all. Only one western paper informed the world about the Polish victory and Marshall Pilsudski's actions.It was ''Le Populaire'' from August 21. Even the American newspapers didn't write the whole truth, or they were simply wrongly informed. "The New York Times'' from August 1 said that one-thousand of French generals were sent to Poland through Gdansk to modernize the Polish army. Ironically, Gdansk was a free city in that time and didn't allow any ships into their harbor that had anything to do with war. (Koryn) It is sad to see how under appreciated Pilsudski and the Polish army was. The world didn't now about the importance of the battle and who really deserved the appreciation. Today, historian's say that Pilsudski was one of the greatest generals ever lived and that he played one of the most important roles in preventing the Red Army to continue their attempt to conquer Europe. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The most important aspect of the alliance was that if anyone of the member countries was to be attacked, all the others would immediately protect it. * Since 1949 most countries of western Europe have joined NATO and in the last years some of the former communist countries, such as Poland and Hungary have joined.

  2. The role of partisan politics in the spread of McCarthyism

    Reeves, a professor and Senior Fellow of the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute. The purpose of this collection is to allow for the different points of view concerning McCarthyism 'in the hope that students will be less inclined to select the "right one" than to think about and discuss the varied

  1. American History.

    - Many factors affected their change of opinion. It was in the 1750s that the colonists first began looking away from their internal politics and paying attention to British policies, and the story of the 1760s and early 1700s is really a series of events that, one by one, widened the split.

  2. Armed forces.

    The cable manager often became a key member of society for the further flung outposts of imperial society. In Australia, Alice Springs actually came to life as the central station for the overland 2000 mile Telegraph line stretching from Adelaide to the North.

  1. Why did communism collapse in Eastern Europe?

    Can an ideal and a leadership really be built on such a shallow and flimsy basis? This essay would argue that the answer to this question is no. For a leadership to lead, it must have strong support and confidence.

  2. The Fall of Communism in Russia.

    The Soviet Union became a super power, the U.S. being the only country more powerful than it. After the death of Stalin in 1953 Nikita Khrushchev became First Secretary of the Communist party. Stalin's death marked the end of supreme power for the head of the party, and Khrushchev condemned Stalin's actions as unnecessary and harmful to the process

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work