• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The most dominant State in Europe during 1870 and 1914.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The most dominant State in Europe during 1870 and 1914 During the Industrial Revolution in Europe, almost all countries began to change a lot. Everything was getting more modern. But during this time the struggle for power between the individual countries also began. Every country wanted to establish "world prestige". All european countries became very strong nationalities and because of this, it is realy difficult to decide, which country the most successful was, seeing that every country have had it's strength and weaknesses. You can only look at one point of view and say which country was the most dominant for this point of view. I'm going to look mainly at the economical point of view and by looking at this point, Germany was the most dominant for me. ...read more.

Middle

The USA and Germany dominted the new industry, by 1914 Germans had taken over the lead in drugs, plastics, explosiv, anaesthetics and rubber and was the also leading producer of chemicals. The empire was an econimical flourishal country. During 1890 and 1914 a almost uninterrupted boom surpassed industry and enconomie of the this far leading country, England. Apart from the econmical growth, there was a fast upswing of science and research. Before the first world war, almost every third nobelprize for natrual sciences went to Germany. The advance of hygienic and medecin decreased the infant mortality. So that the population increased again at circa 67 mio. inhabitants, with this Germany was in the fourth place among the sovereign states. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also the attempt to move the middle and low income class into a financial engagement in the german colonies failed. The german colonies have been insignificant as a "settlement area". Under the reign of emporor Wilhelm the 2nd the german fleet was extended, which occupation the emperor passionatal practised. The extension of the fleet was another striving for "world prestige". Likewise the german army was taking a consinderable size, the peacetime army felt never below 400 000 troops. The german army became effeceincy as a byword. Conclusion Altoghether looked, Germany was a economical strong and rich country and was more sucessful with it, than a lot of other countries. "Made in Germany" became an respected "trade-mark" The german army was also very strong and powerful. Because of all the above-mentioned points, I think that Germany was the most economical dominant state in europe, during this period. By Judith Hollmann, lower 6th ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Bismarck's effect on Germany and Europe

    The contents of the Dual Alliance were revealed three times by Bismarck, to Britain, Austria and Russia. The contents were shown to Britain to prove that the alliance was purely defensive, causing Britain to change the Mediterranean Entente to guarantee the straits and the Turkish empire.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Nazism gave young people a chance to actually be part of this process, to feel a part of historical destiny. In a sense, Nazism liberated in young people the tremendous energy that comes from participating in a politics based on the belief that one is indeed going to create a new world or a new age.

  1. Soviet State

    * The impact of collectivisation: The government claimed that collectivisation had the support of most poor and middle peasants. * The reality was that collectivisation was resisted, not just by the minority of kulaks but the majority of peasants. And their resistance, which often took violent forms, turned mass collectivisation

  2. Herr Otto Von Bismarcks.

    Bismarcks reactionary stance and anti liberalism endeared him to the Prussian government. In 1851 he was appointed Prussian representative to the restored German Bund as a reward for his stance in the United Diet. During his time in the Bund Bismarck formed an anti-Austrian view point.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work