• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The most important aim of foreign policy 1933-1936 was to overthrow the terms of the Treaty of Versailles". How valid is this statement to Nazi foreign policy in this period?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A2 History - Mrs Wilkenson "The most important aim of foreign policy 1933-1936 was to overthrow the terms of the Treaty of Versailles". How valid is this statement to Nazi foreign policy in this period? Adolf Hitler being 'fuhrer' , meant he was the main attributer in policy-making especially with regards to the Nazi foreign policy. Nazi foreign policy originally came mostly from Hitler's ideas and from his writings in his book 'Mein Kampf.' His aims were established from as early as 1920 and you could say they were quite solid in terms of what his actual long-term goals were. The Nazi party, Hitler and the German people were still full of great hatred after being blamed for the events of World War One, and later with the introduction of the Treaty of Versailles (TOV) enforced onto Germany by the three main world powers, only made matters worse. Hitler's foreign policy not only appealed to him but in general appealed to most German people who had been through many years of discontent, they saw his national policies as fresh and new and a way of getting out of the mess that Germany had originally put it self in by the signing of the TOV. ...read more.

Middle

This in a way shows the great kind of influence Hitler was beginning to portray both as leader of Germany and on the international level as well. Secondly, another great aim of his foreign policy was that of 'lebensraum', most if not all the people of Europe had their own nations and it was decided that the German race had to be re-united in one main land which ultimately meant that these actions could begin a new war because it was against the rules set out by the TOV. To Hitler getting more land was very important and if not one of his most important long-term goals which had to be achieved. To begin, the TOV took great parts of Germany out and were given to many of the surrounding countries for example the Sudetenland. Many thousands of Germans were now living out side of the Reich and Hitler had the firm belief that something had to be done about it. It became clearly obvious as time went on that Hitler wanted Germany to become a dominating power in Europe and to accomplish this he needed to go back on the territorial terms set out by the TOV. The re-entering of the resourceful Rhineland and the remilitarisation of it in 1936 demonstrated his first actions and little did anyone do to stop him. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1934, when the non-aggression pact was signed by Poland and Germany, for Hitler this was just to be a temporary treaty as he never had the intention of keeping the relation going as the invasion of 1939 shows. In September 1939, Germany and Russia both invaded Poland that the Western democracies were most keen to protect from the wrath of nazi Germany. This was to prove the final straw for both France and Britain regarding Hitler's expansionist policy, it was during this time that both allies saw him as quite insane, a liar and very untruthful and if something was not to be done then he would later become un-stoppable. Overall, Hitler's foreign policy was beginning to look more like a farce than ever before and something had to be done about it to ensure stability. His beliefs that Germany should be great again and be resourceful is one thing but planning to take over countries which are not his another and was a cause for great concern because Britain and France could no longer manage to appease many other of his desirable actions. When one comes to discuss his foreign policy aims, it not only includes the TOV but also the various other aspects of his other policies in general as well. 30th September 2004 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Mussolini's foreign policy.

    3 star(s)

    However, as the city was cut off from its surrounding countryside it did not develop its potential and proved to be a financial drain. Yet it did prove that Mussolini could use the traditional methods of diplomacy when it was necessary.

  2. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    Flemming continues to argue that keywords from Wagner's work were commonplace in Hitler's speeches; words such as "elimination", "ridding" and "reduction". Again, his is a very tenuous link and can only be seen if you know what eventually happened. It can therefore be seen that Mein Kampf did not contain

  1. Assess the success of Bismarck's foreign policy with reference to: a) Keeping France isolated ...

    This infuriated Bismarck, as again he had been defeated and instead of decreasing support for France, he ended up creating support for them, and he realized France was not so isolated after all. There was, in 1875, another threat to the stability of the new unified Germany.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    In the beginning each of the zones was sealed off tightly from the others. The ruined economy, the disrupted transportation, and the divided families all found further difficulties and complications created by four zones, four occupying powers, four different political and administrative setups, four different mentalities, and four borders to cross.

  1. "How far do the sources suggest consistent aims in Mussolini's foreign policy 1922-1939?"

    grain, and to perform one of Mussolini's foreign policy objectives, to increase international prestige. D. Mack Smith comments on the battle, "Success in this battle was...another illusory propaganda victory won at the expense of the Italian economy..." The effects on the people were that their quality of diet decreased and

  2. How far had Hitler achieved his Third Reich?

    On 1 April 1933, Hitler began a nationwide boycott of Jewish professions and businesses. It was originally planned to be permanent, but influential conservatives in the government pressurised Hitler into limiting it to a single day. The result was disappointing for the Nazi leaders as they did not receive the public support they had hoped for.

  1. How far can the impact of the depression be seen as a key turning ...

    the blame and responsibility for WWI solely on Germany, but also made them pay astronomical reparations, lose all of their colonies, restricted their military by limiting the army to 100k men and forbidding them to have an air force or navy.

  2. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    Many of the articles of the Treaty of Versailles were territorial. For example, Alsace-Lorraine was given to France. West Prussia and Upper Silesia were given to Poland while the Saar, Danzig and Memel under the control of the League of Nations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work