• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Most Important Factor for the Failure of League of Nations was Abyssinia

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Most Important Factor for the Failure of League of Nations was Abyssinia Although Abyssinia was an important factor in the failure of the League of Nations (LON), there were other factors that played a part, which I will detail below. The situation with Abyssinia took place in 1935-36, between Italy and Abyssinia, a very poor, African country. Both were members of the LON. At this time, Mussolini was the dictator of Italy, who had already shown his aggressive expansion policies, and their had been some military tension between Abyssinia and the nearby Italian colonies. In October 1935, Italy invaded Abyssinia, and Abyssinia complained to the LON. The LON condemned Italy as the aggressor, and imposed economic sanctions on Italy, excluding coal, oil and iron. ...read more.

Middle

The Manchurian incident occurred in 1931-33, between Japan and Manchuria, a northern province of China. Japan wanted to control Manchuria, and owned the South Manchurian railway. On the 18th September, there was an explosion on the railway near the city of Mukden. The Japanese said the Chinese did it, which China denied, and fired at a Chinese patrol. The Japanese military started to take over Manchuria. The Japanese government disagreed but were powerless. China asked the LON for help, and the LON told the Japanese to get out of Manchuria, but they ignored them, and the LON was powerless. The LON set up the Lyton Commission to investigate the situation, and declared that Japan was in the wrong. ...read more.

Conclusion

These included their lack of an army, their failure of disarmament, and their disorganisation. They excluded several powerful countries from the start, such as Germany, the USSR and the USA, yet they depended on the support of their powerful members-mainly Britain, France and Italy. Their idealism and lack of effective sanctions, were also cracks in the system. In conclusion, I think that Abyssinia was the most important factor of the failure of the LON, although the other factors played and important part also. They were all building up towards the failure of the LON. With failure after failure, it was only a matter of time before someone stood up and actually accused them of it. This somebody would be Haile Selassie, furious at the LON's treatment of the invasion of his country. The leakage of the Hoare-Laval Plan to the press meant that the public began to distrust them as well. ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    Even if the USA had been part of the League in the beginning, it is highly probable that they would have withdrawn interest after October 1929, if not withdrawn altogether. Having said all that, the remaining members of the League could have combined and made a force to be reckoned with.

  2. Why was the League of Nations a failure in the 1930's?

    All powers knew that Hitler was secretly aiming to rearm Germany, so they began to build armaments themselves. The conference finally ended in 1934. People say the Conference was doomed from the start as no countries ever took the idea of disarmament very seriously.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    Although both Italy and Abyssinia were supposed to do as the league told them to do, if Italy didn't agree with the leagues decision then they weren't going to listen to it as the Italian leader Mussolini was quite prepared to go to war with Abyssinia.

  2. "The League of Nations representedno more than

    The leaders who set up the league stated that the league had been set up to resolve political issues and under any circumstances hinder a war from occurring. The league clearly failed because World War Two still occurred in spite of the leagues presence.

  1. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    member did break the Covenant and go to war, other members would stop trading with it and send troops if necessary to force it to stop fighting. Critics suggested there was some woolly thinking and Wilson acted as if he knew the solutions to Europe's problems.

  2. AS Level Edexcel History Spain 1931-33 Revision Notes

    This was a massive rival to the socialist trade union GT found 1888. Anarchy was banned in the 1920s but emerged as a major force during the second republic. Religious nationalist and separatist groups Because of Spain?s mountainous geography the two regions that it consists of are very different to one another.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work