Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Movie Alexander the Great

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alexander the Great The movie starts out with Philip II preparing for battle, and he is told of the birth of his son. Philip doesn't believe that the child is his because Olympias, the queen and mother of Alexander, claims that her child is "a god born of a god." One of Philip's generals convinces him not to kill the baby but to let him grow up and be his successor. As Alexander gets older he is tutored by Aristotle who tries to teach the boy patience, but that is hard to do when the boy views himself as a god. He compares himself with Achilles and like Achilles he would rather have "a short life filled with glory than a long life of obscurity." Philip decides to make Alexander the regent of Pella, while he is fighting. He decided to do this because Alexander's mother is spreading rumors that Philip is dead. Both, Olympias and Philip, seemed to believe that Alexander would side with one of them and allow them to influence how he ruled. They were both entirely wrong though he ruled how he wanted. Philip then invites Alexander to join him in battle and Alexander saves his father's life, with a little hesitation. After the battle with Athens is won, Alexander has two demands from the Athenians; one is that no Greek state will bear arms against Pella, and that they supply men, weapons, and ships for the war against Persia. ...read more.

Middle

Alexander then orders the men who slaughtered their king to be killed. Then Alexander declares to Athens he wants to be considered a God, because he has gone farther than any man or god by conquering parts of India. His troops become angry with him for disowning his father and proclaiming himself a son of Zeus, and during a drunken fight he kills one of his friends, Cleitus, for speaking his mind. Alexander retreated back to Babylon, after realizing he was wrong, and when he returned he married Darius' daughter Roxane. It ends with him saying he hoped that all the people in his empire could be alike and live alike, and during this speech he collapses on the table. He is then shown dying with his soldiers walking by the place he is laying, and when asked who he leaves his empire to he replies "to the strongest." I believe that Rossen was trying to show Alexander's life in the most accurate possible way, and he did really well. Most of the movie really wasn't about Alexander's conquests in battle but were about his horrible family conflict and how that made him to be the person he was. I think there were many important scenes in this movie, where the soothsayer explains why Alexander can be considered a son of a god, where Philip gets drunk and sings and dances calling himself Philip the barbarian, but I think the most important scene is after Alexander is declared regent. ...read more.

Conclusion

And possibly if they had shown more of Alexander and what people thought of him. I don't know that Rossen really knew what route to take with this movie it is so scattered; the beginning was actually really good. But somewhere in the middle of the movie it seems like he lost interest, which made me lose interest, in what he was doing and just finished it. The end where they are leaving the palace in India and even before that has no sense to it, or I couldn't find any. I don't know if I just got bored but I couldn't make sense of much towards the end. And really, I don't think I learned anything from this movie I didn't already know except, I guess, that Alexander was from a very, very dysfunctional family. I don't think I would recommend this movie, just for the fact it is so hard to follow. But it did have a strength; it did show the dysfunction of his family in a fairly historically accurate way. The biggest flaw is not going into much more detail about Alexander as a King and warrior. I think they show him way too immature and childish, which obviously wasn't the case since he achieved everything he did. It would be awesome if they remade it with the idea Rossen had in mind, or had in mind towards the beginning, but going a lot more in-depth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    * Common man's grievances not aired, sheep and cloth taxes upheld. * Lacked organisation, did not get near centre of power. * However - did raise some support - grievances were widely held. * Got to Exeter. Kett's (1549 Rebellions)

  2. Why Was King Alfred So Great?

    Furthermore the Vikings were very active traders, and with their empire on the doorstep Alfred would have been able to gain easy access to many resources which may not have been so readily available in Wessex. Post-Danelaw, Alfred remained aware that the Vikings had destructive potential, and though mutual respect existed, Alfred soon went about strengthening his armies and defences.

  1. The First English Civil War

    The order was countermanded within a few hours, it is true, but Charles had good reason for avoiding detachments from his own army. On 29 March, Hopton had undergone a severe defeat at Cheriton, near New Alresford. In the preliminary manoeuvres, and in the opening stages of the battle, the advantage lay with the Royalists.

  2. Assess the view that Philip II as king of Spain was Absolute in Theory ...

    Lynch says that Philip's power was restricted in the first place by the inefficiency of his bureaucracy. Which is an accurate statement considering that Spain during the 15th Century was not a single monarchy, but a federation of individual realms, each sceptical of one another and guarding their own rights.

  1. Discuss the course and consequences of the Arab Israeli Conflict

    Many others such as the King of Italy and Pope Pius X were approached by Herzl, all of whom had some degree of influence that would assist in declaring Palestine as a Jewish State. These undertakings were not especially successful, and it was not until 1903, however, that Herzl realized

  2. Kit Kittredge and the great depression

    Jackie, Kit's best friend is forced to live out of Cincinnati, with her aunt for a little while, because her parents cannot afford to take care of her for now. Kit sees how her friend's and the people around her are being affected so she tries her hardest to make things seems better.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    Despite Indian revolts, the early Indian Uprising, being followed by Gandhi?s non-co-operation, civil disobedience and quit India movements, the British showed that they would only leave India when it suited them. As Jordan says, ?The British left India for economic reasons, not because they were ground down by decades of

  2. Russian History. A period of great achievement To what extent do you agree with ...

    At the previous change of rule, Sophia may have acted in the interest of her brother, Fedor, as various rumours exist of her pleading the dying Alexis not to proclaim Peter the heir. Fedor?s capability to lead the Russia raised questions, based on his sickly nature and poor health.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work