• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The need to modernise their backward economy was the most important reason why the rulers of Russia introduced reforms.' How far do you agree with this view of the period 1855 to 1956?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The need to modernise their backward economy was the most important reason why the rulers of Russia introduced reforms.' How far do you agree with this view of the period 1855 to 1956? Introduction In the period 1855 to 1956, Russia went through many different rulers, all of whom introduced reforms. Reforms such as Witte's industrialisation were essential because the economy was behind that of the Western nations for most of the period. However, many of the reforms were motivated by a need for Russia to prepare or recover from a war, such as the Crimean War and the Great Patriotic War. There are also examples of when reforms were undertaken in order to keep power, such as when Nicholas II introduced the Dumas. Also, the ideologies of the rulers cannot be ignored. The tsars used reforms in order to keep their autocratic power and the communists used War Communism in order to speed up the process of attaining communism. Therefore, all of these need to be assessed in order to find the most important reason. ...read more.

Middle

Khrushchev: * He tried to increase agricultural production by introducing the Virgin Lands Campaign. Reason 2 - prepare for war or recover from a war Alexander II: * The emancipation was partially motivated by a need to reform the military. This is because according to Milyutin, "serfdom does not permit us to shorten the term of service nor to increase the number of those indefinite leave so as to reduce the number of troops on hand". * He also introduced military reforms to decrease the corruption of the officers. This shows that for Alexander II, recovering from the loss of the Crimean war was important to him. Alexander III: * Witte focused on building railways such as the trans-Siberian railway which would help Russia to expand in the East. * No wars happened in his reign so war was not an important factor for Alexander III. Lenin: * War communism can be seen as a means of winning the civil war because the Reds were able to feed their army. ...read more.

Conclusion

Alexander III: * He was a true autocrat who did not believe in his father's liberal ideas. His counter reforms can be seen as a response to the reforms of Alexander II. Lenin: * War communism aimed to create a communist state before going through the other stages as proposed by Marx. Lenin believed that war communism was a means to achieving true communism. * The NEP can be seen as a shift in Lenin's ideology. Conclusion Ultimately, the rulers of Russia in the period 1855 to 1956 introduced reforms for many reasons. There is no doubt that some of the reforms were made because of their personal beliefs but this cannot be seen as the main reason. Most of the rulers used repression more effectively in keeping power than reforms. Although all the rulers recognised that the economy was behind that of the Western nations, it seems that they never prioritised it. Agricultural reforms were always implemented in order to industrialise the country. However, for many of the rulers, industrialisation was used to make Russia stronger and the best way this could be achieved was through war. Therefore, the need to prepare for war was the most important reason for introducing reforms. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    The army was very important to the state, as the 1905 revolution demonstrated, and their continuing use of force against the peasantry is one reason why peasant opposition was rarely successful in improving their quality of life in the period.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * The Terror had a huge impact on families. Whole families might be arrested and deported, or children left behind with friends and family. * Men might be sent to work many miles away from their wives and children and not return for years. You often did not know if your spouse was alive or dead.

  1. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    the claim that communists and tsars ruled Russia in the same way. Considerable continuity is also evident in how communist and tsarist regimes viewed reform of the Russian state. Reforms were often met with restrictions throughout the 1855-1964 period. As Lenin dissolved the Constituent Assembly, Nicholas II was similarly quick to the first two Duma's.

  2. Free essay

    Was Stalin the most successful ruler of Russia in the period 1855-1956? Explain with ...

    Khrushchev, however, maintained his power by his policies. The population was still mostly peasant or working class, and that was who his policies were for. The other thing that needs to be looked at in regards to maintaining power is how the leaders were removed from power. Alexander II was assassinated, which shows poor power.

  1. Success of Daniel O'Connell's Catholic Emancipation Campaign

    -The final strategy was the Catholic Rent. Regular small contributions from the people crystallised O'Connell's policy on issues and grievances and on the admission of Catholic priests created an effective channel of communication for the national movement now emerging. Those paying the Catholic Rent felt they belonged to the movement

  2. Why did the rulers of Russia so often resort to repression in the period ...

    He was assassinated by a party representing these very people at the 7th such attempt. Nicholas 2 realised (as the failure of the Provincial Government was to do for the Bolsheviks) that power was questioned when repression was not implemented.

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    Both of these views contest Communist ideology had an influence on the decision to Collectivise. Conquest based the 'influence' on consolidation of power, and Fitzpatrick focused on the pragmatism caused by poor understanding of the original Communist concept of De-kulakisation.

  2. Opposition to Russian governments was ineffective in the period from 1855 to 1964. How ...

    opposition was successful (in assassinating Alexander II and forcing Nicholas II to abdicate) there was no real alternative and in this way it would seem opposition in Russia was ineffective when it came to the Tsar?s. The Provisional Government that took over faced widespread opposition within Russia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work