• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The outbreak of war in Europe in 1914 was due to an aggressive German foreign policy which had been waged since c1900

Extracts from this document...


Roz Cresswell 'The outbreak of war in Europe in 1914 was due to an aggressive German foreign policy which had been waged since c1900' Although the statement is partially true, there were also many other factors that impacted upon the outbreak of the First World War, such as the rising tensions between Russia and Austria Hungry and the blank check. Source W and source X are at least partly correct in saying that Germany was primarily responsible for the war but equally source V makes many valid points about Germany feeling under threat. There are also other factors which are not mentioned in the sources, which present a broader picture on what was happening in Europe up to the First World War and suggest that Germany was only partially to blame, for example the British and French role can also often be seen as a cause of the war. Sources W and X both largely agree with the statement and create strong arguments for the First World War being due to German foreign policy aggression. Both state that the war was almost inevitable and that it was only a matter of time before it would occur. Source X states that " the German plan to unleash a continental war which had crystallised a month previously" which tells us that the Germans had already decided they would go to war during the month of the Sarajevo murder. ...read more.


Since the unification, the Germans were set upon becoming a major power. This would have a very significant impact upon how their foreign policy came across, as it would appear aggressive. The General Staff managed to take control of the Reichstag; this meant that Germany was being run by the military, which were very much in favour of war, so that they could create an empire. Blackbourn in source W states that "of course they would have preferred to get what they wanted without a war", but it implies that as long as they created an empire they did not care what happened between. This would be shown as aggression through their foreign policy. The sources make a number of valid points, however they gloss over or do not mention the other things that had occurred between Germany and other countries at this time. The Germans appear to make many decisions that would cause the Triple Entente not to trust them. The Moroccan Crisis of March 1905 supports the view of sources W and X, which both state that Germany was the aggressor. The Crisis caused relations between Germany and France to be damaged. Germanys efforts to form a wedge between France and England backfired and also created a stronger bond between France, England and Russia. ...read more.


Indeed, David Kaiser advances on sources X and W by saying that Germany did not deliberately plan war but believed war was an acceptable risk as it would be short and winnable and should not involved Britain. In conclusion, although all three sources agree that Germany was aggressive in their foreign policy, source V also gives a range of reasons for war and does not entirely blame Germany. Indeed it accepts that many factors occurred across Europe and although Germany had a big part to play in it, they were not just to blame. Their aggression in the years since c1900 will have impacted upon the scale of war but the Triple Entente also made Germany feel surrounded and gave them the need to be aggressive. Sources W and X give good evidence to it being solely Germany's fault. Other historians such as Fritz Fischer who see the war as a product of German aggression support this view. However John Moses, the author of source X was hugely influenced by Fritz Fischer and so his work may have been biased against Germany. Overall the sources and other evidence suggest that German foreign policy was aggressive, but that the other factors also played a hand in the start of the First World War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Decisions made in Berlin from 1900 determined the outbreak of war in Europe in ...

    3 star(s)

    The fact it's also a book also disputes this aspect as it was obviously made to make money and so certain interpretations such as this one which could be something of that intent. Sources 1 and 3 also mention the aggressive nature of Germany which is a decision in itself to cause the outbreak of war.

  2. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    The developments in weapons technologies enable the unification of Germany because it allows Prussia to defeat Austria and then France, which allows Prussia to dominate Germany. Economics contributes to this because without a strong economy Prussia could not have had the budget to afford new weapons which would aid the

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Wiener Neustadt in Austria emerged from the air raids and the street-fighting with only 18 houses intact and its population reduced from 45,000 to 860. In Russia 6 million houses had been destroyed, leaving 25 million people homeless. In D�sseldorf 93 percent of the houses were left uninhabitable.

  2. The outbreak of war in Europe in 1914 was due to an aggressive German ...

    However, it should be noted that these demands were drawn up only after the war had started and so it does not seem legitimate to argue that this proves this was the intention of Germany before the war, it is to be expected that once engaged in a war Germany should have aims.

  1. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    the Italian flag and a drummer at his side should take the field on the western front, and not on the eastern front". The alliance provided the support of Italy or Germany in case of a French attack, support in case of an attack by two great powers on any

  2. "The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in ...

    The date chosen could have been selected at random or also could have been chosen deliberately to alarm the Serbs and let them know that their days of Pan-Slav dreams and the creation of Yugoslavia are not to be realised.

  1. "Kaiser Wilhelm II used to the full his authority as Kaiser of the German ...

    However, Blackbourne and Eley, whilst supporting the idea of Wilhelm's role as pawn to be pressured and used by others, believed that it was the working classes and their main political party, the SPD, which posed the major threat to his ability to rule, which is reflected in his consistent battle to overcome their influence in the Reichstag.

  2. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    However, these nicknames have come under serious disrepute within the last 30 years. Speer was arrested in 1945 and was put on trial at Nuremberg at which he was charged with: 1. having plotted to wage aggressive war 2. of participating in war crimes 3. of committing war crimes 4.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work