• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The outbreak of war in Europe in 1914 was due to an aggressive German foreign policy which had been waged since c1900

Extracts from this document...


Roz Cresswell 'The outbreak of war in Europe in 1914 was due to an aggressive German foreign policy which had been waged since c1900' Although the statement is partially true, there were also many other factors that impacted upon the outbreak of the First World War, such as the rising tensions between Russia and Austria Hungry and the blank check. Source W and source X are at least partly correct in saying that Germany was primarily responsible for the war but equally source V makes many valid points about Germany feeling under threat. There are also other factors which are not mentioned in the sources, which present a broader picture on what was happening in Europe up to the First World War and suggest that Germany was only partially to blame, for example the British and French role can also often be seen as a cause of the war. Sources W and X both largely agree with the statement and create strong arguments for the First World War being due to German foreign policy aggression. Both state that the war was almost inevitable and that it was only a matter of time before it would occur. Source X states that " the German plan to unleash a continental war which had crystallised a month previously" which tells us that the Germans had already decided they would go to war during the month of the Sarajevo murder. ...read more.


Since the unification, the Germans were set upon becoming a major power. This would have a very significant impact upon how their foreign policy came across, as it would appear aggressive. The General Staff managed to take control of the Reichstag; this meant that Germany was being run by the military, which were very much in favour of war, so that they could create an empire. Blackbourn in source W states that "of course they would have preferred to get what they wanted without a war", but it implies that as long as they created an empire they did not care what happened between. This would be shown as aggression through their foreign policy. The sources make a number of valid points, however they gloss over or do not mention the other things that had occurred between Germany and other countries at this time. The Germans appear to make many decisions that would cause the Triple Entente not to trust them. The Moroccan Crisis of March 1905 supports the view of sources W and X, which both state that Germany was the aggressor. The Crisis caused relations between Germany and France to be damaged. Germanys efforts to form a wedge between France and England backfired and also created a stronger bond between France, England and Russia. ...read more.


Indeed, David Kaiser advances on sources X and W by saying that Germany did not deliberately plan war but believed war was an acceptable risk as it would be short and winnable and should not involved Britain. In conclusion, although all three sources agree that Germany was aggressive in their foreign policy, source V also gives a range of reasons for war and does not entirely blame Germany. Indeed it accepts that many factors occurred across Europe and although Germany had a big part to play in it, they were not just to blame. Their aggression in the years since c1900 will have impacted upon the scale of war but the Triple Entente also made Germany feel surrounded and gave them the need to be aggressive. Sources W and X give good evidence to it being solely Germany's fault. Other historians such as Fritz Fischer who see the war as a product of German aggression support this view. However John Moses, the author of source X was hugely influenced by Fritz Fischer and so his work may have been biased against Germany. Overall the sources and other evidence suggest that German foreign policy was aggressive, but that the other factors also played a hand in the start of the First World War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    Would it have been wise for Bismarck to antagonize France at Ems if Prussia did not have a strong army and economy to win a war? It would not have been wise and as Bismarck was an intelligent man he wouldn't have dealt with Austria and France aggressively if he had a weak army and economy.

  2. "Kaiser Wilhelm II used to the full his authority as Kaiser of the German ...

    The cycle continued as the Kaiser gained yet more influence within the Reichstag, which enabled him to have his Bills passed more easily, giving him a sense of personal rule. However, the mere fact that Caprivi had to consult and negotiate with the Reichstag proved that without their agreement, the Kaiser could do very little.

  1. Vietnam war

    towards Vietnam was characterised by: Americanisation and escalation of involvement in a ground war; and fighting a limited war. As a whole, these policies and strategies would contribute to the greater US foreign policy of actively containing communism in Indochina through maintaining South Vietnam's independence.

  2. "How far do the sources suggest consistent aims in Mussolini's foreign policy 1922-1939?"

    In October 1936 Mussolini made an alliance with Hitler. They declared common policies towards Spain, the Danubian countries, the Soviet Union, and the League of Nations. Mussolini called the new alliance the "Rome-Berlin Axis". On November 25th 1936 Germany made the Anti-Comintern Pact with Japan, pledging mutual support against the Soviets, Mussolini joined in November 1937, extending the Axis from Rome to Tokyo.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Half of Britain's mercantile fleet had been sent to the bottom. The financial system had been destroyed and international trade completely disrupted. Some currencies collapsed completely and inflation got out of hand in many countries: in Hungary one American dollar was worth 11 sextillion pengoes.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    An argument may suggest that Bismarck implemented this alliance in order to diplomatically isolate France. This caused the Russians to seek an alliance with Germany, as they needed Germany's backing for their expansion in the Balkans. Bismarck, however, was more interested in a three party agreement, since it was "the

  1. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    of committing war crimes 4. of crimes against humanity In an unusual turn of events, Speer accepted all charges ?and seemed to come face to face with himself and the nature of the state that he had helped to create?[10]. Speer took full responsibility as a leader in the Third Reich for crimes committed by the Nazis and the death of six million Jews.

  2. Decisions made in Berlin from 1900 determined the outbreak of war in Europe in ...

    Source 3 also agrees to a certain extent with the opinion, as the decisions made from 1900-1914 were essentially to let the Schlieffen plan determine events, this is evident that it wasn?t a decision that would help Germany or at least the outcome of war as Keegan describes the Kaisers attitude as though he panicked into making the decision.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work