• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Peace Settlements and the New Europe 1918-1923

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Internal Assessment The Peace Settlements and the New Europe 1918-1923 Discuss the view that the Paris settlements were an unsatisfactory compromise between hopes for reconciliation and a desire to punish the Central Powers. Jens Vall´┐Ż January 21, 2002 I.B. World History HL Table of contents Introduction 1 Body The War Aims of the Great European Powers 2 The Peace Settlements 4 The Economic and Social Crisis 5 Conclusion 6 Bibliography 7 The Peace Settlements and the New Europe 1918-1923 Discuss the view that the Paris settlements were an unsatisfactory compromise between hopes for reconciliation and a desire to punish the Central Powers. Introduction The Peace Treaties of 1919-20 were seen by some contemporaries as a triumph of democracy, a victory for the rule of law that would end the militaristic tendencies of the Great European Powers. To other critics it seemed no more than a hypocritical act of vengeance and economic ignorance, and a short-term victory for the allies. As for the hopes for reconciliation, the victorious Great Powers desired to prevent future conflicts as the casualties and destruction had been so immense during the war. It failed to do so as the conditions of the final settlements only humiliated the German people, and in the short-term crippled one of the strongest economies on the European continent. For the victorious nations including Britain and France the treaties left only some short-term advantages. It failed to reestablish a balance of power in Europe that maybe would have prevented future disasters. ...read more.

Middle

and communist expansion in western Europe. Another dilemma facing the representatives negotiating the peace treaties was to set up new national states in the vacuum created by collapse of Austria-Hungary and the defeat of Germany (Binder p. 70). These newly created states were particularly vulnerable to revolution. Combined with the influenza pandemic which by the spring of 1919 had caused the deaths of millions of people, it was certain that strong nations should be established in eastern Europe in order to withstand communism. This is also why the negotiaters refrained from weakening Germany too badly as this would send the nation into the hands of the Bolsheviks. The immediate armistice presented by Wilson according to his Fourteen Points and revised by the allies went far to protect their position at the coming Peace Conference. It demanded Germany to evacuate all occupied territory, including Alsace-Lorraine and to withdraw beyond a 10 kilometre wide neutral to the east of the Rhine. The German navy was also to be interned in either a neutral or a British port. These terms immediatly ended German influence outside of Germany itself, thereby making it easier for the victorious nations to negotiate the future of Europe. The French Premier Clemenceau was convinced that only an effective balance of power in Europe coul dcontain Germany. He was aware that France, with it's 1.3 million casualties and severely weakened economy was facing Germany which, as a consequence of her collapse of Austria-Hungary and Tsarist Russia, was potentially stronger than in 1914. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore it can be said that the Versailles Treaty was only a short-term victory for the Allies. When the American Senate voted against the Treaty it also took away the prestige from the League of Nations that was the only hope for persistent peace that remained after the war. As the balance of power had been knocked over by the disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian empire and the Russian revolution, Europe was left in a very unstable situation. The Allied hopes for reconciliation were in some ways met. The autocratic and militaristic ideas that led great powers like Germany and Austria-Hungary disappeared with the victory of the Allies. The long-term mobilization and race for overseas expansion that were factors of war, became ideas of the past. Even though England and the United States remained a colonial power to be reckoned with, the empiralistic tendencies of the Great Nations of the world were partly forgotten after the war. But this didn't mean that the Allies achieved reconciliation because of the negotiations after the war. The balance of power was lost, and the situation was unstable. Therefore it would be correct to say that the Paris settlements were an unsatisfactory compromise between hopes for reconciliation and a desire to punish the Central Powers, because neither of the two were achieved. Germany prevailed as a more potential power because of the disturbance in the balance of power, and reconciliation between the nations of Europe is not the correct way to describe post-war international relations. It was a short-term victory for democracy and security against militarism, but at the same time a hypocritical act of vengeance and economic ignorance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Verdun * In February 1916 the Germans attacked Verdun in eastern France. Their plan was to 'bleed France dry'. They knew that the French would defend Verdun and believed that they would send more and more reinforcements into the city and its forts. * The battle dragged on until December.

  2. Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the ...

    the foreign powers, the remilitarisation of Germany and everything else the public wished for. The trial lasted 24 days and reached the front pages on a daily basis. With the eyes of Germany on him "he pleaded guilty. Not for treason - but for patriotism."

  1. The Collapse of Communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe

    The superpower-funded war in Afghanistan was, as stated earlier, misunderstood until perhaps a few years ago. At the time of its occurrence, and during its immediate aftermath, U.S. involvement in Afghanistan was generally defined as an extension of containment, justified with the characteristic moral charge and talk of liberating Afghan captives from an unwanted regime.

  2. Did The League of Nations Have any chance of long Term Success?

    of the use of force and that the League responded in a positive manner to those (the Lithuanians) who had used force. Turkey (1923) The League failed to stop a bloody war in Turkey (see League failures) but it did respond to the humanitarian crisis caused by this war.

  1. How far do you agree that the terms of the Paris peace settlements were ...

    is doubtful whether a formal and legal revision is as yet practicable. The main powers Britain America and France all had different aims: Wilson (the American president) wanted a fair peace, Clemenceau (French prime minister) wanted a harsh peace and lastly Lloyd George (British prime minister) wanted a compromise peace.

  2. THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES

    GERMAN REARMAMENT & FOREIGN POLICY LEVEL 1-3 SOURCE A is from a speech made by Hitler in 1933. SOURCE A Germany will get rid of her army and navy and destroy all her weapons if all other countries do the same.

  1. Analyse the impact of the USA's entry into WWI both in influencing the eventual ...

    because of their implementation of this new tactic which managed to break through the Hindenburg Line and thus guarantee allied victory. Thereafter, Germany insisted on an immediate armistice, acknowledging that they have been defeated. New allied tactics therefore contributed greatly to the Allied victory, even more so than US involvement,

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    British forces were engaged in battle from the Caribbean and the American colonies to the coasts of India. Furthermore, the United Colonies, as the Continental Congress called the rebelling 13 colonies, were widely scattered in a huge wilderness and were occupied by a people most of whom were in arms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work