• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining political status quo through a policy of moderate reform in the years before WWI. How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Charlotte Phillips The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining political status quo through a policy of moderate reform. How far do you agree with this judgement? The political status quo in Germany was successfully maintained by the political establishment to a certain extent due to moderate reform by Von Burlow and Bethmann-Hollweg, however would have not been completely successful without the intervention of nationalist foreign policy which ?soaked up? the tension for reform and secured the Burlow Bloc. The success of maintaining the status quo was also marginally down to the lack of unity in the Reichstag, which meant no groups were willing to work together to change the status quo and the constitutional powers held by the Kaiser which meant he held the majority of the power and was never challenged in this period of time. Overall, the most significant reason for the maintenance of the political status quo was moderate reform however; security of this maintenance of the political status quo was due to the other three factors as well. It is clear that the demand for reform was significant in Germany, which was putting a strain on the power of the Kaiser and ruling elites which meant that ...read more.

Middle

Von Burlow used the issue of nationalism to convince voters to vote for conservative and liberal groups such as the Pan German League and the Agrarian League by threating the outcome of a red-black victory (alliance of centre and SDP parties). By using nationalism he managed to succeed in getting voters to vote for parties within the Burlow Bloc, which kept socialists at bay thus maintaining the status quo within the Reichstag. Overall nationalism succeeded in maintaining the status quo however would not have been able to maintain it fully without moderate reform as nationalism alone was not a significant enough distraction to completely settle the need for reform of the political status quo. It could be argued that the Kaisers stability in the period was an important reason to factor into the maintenance of the political status quo, as his power was never challenged even when questionable situations arose such as the Daily Telegraph affair. However even though he was a strong figure at the time it was not the most significant reason from the maintenance of the political status quo. The power of the Kaiser was demonstrated during the Daily Telegraph affair in 1908. ...read more.

Conclusion

An example of this is after the Zabern affair, SPD member Philipp Schiedemann demanded that he chancellor resign after the vote of no confidence however other parties in the Reichstag ignored the request. This evidently shows the Reichstag to be lacking unity which ultimately cost them the opportunity to change the political status quo in Germany. This factor was important however not as important as the moderate reforms introduced by the Kaiser because event if the Reichstag was unified in may not have had enough power to stand up to the Kaiser and change the political status quo. In conclusion, it can be seen the policy of moderate reform was important in the maintenance of the political status quo however would not have been completely successful without the achievements of nationalist policy as it succeeded in distracting the nation?s attention away from the need for reform. Disunity in the Reichstag was an effect of Bismarck?s reforms so is not a significant enough reason for the maintenance of the political status quo alone, while the strength of the Kaiser was important it would have not been able to maintain the political status quo without moderate reform as there needed to be a balance between moderate reform and the Kaisers almost autocratic rule inored to keep the political status quo maintained. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How Successfully in the period 1870 to 1914 did the ruling elites of Germany ...

    Wilhelm II's Strategy to Change Wilhelm II stated that he wanted to appeal to all elements of society, and in doing so he pursued a number of random, ad hoc policies that appeared to be ill thought out indicating, lack of central direction and did not necessarily harness change to his advantage.

  2. Consequence of WWI

    When economic collapse finally came on November 15, 1923, it took 4.2 trillion German marks to buy a single American dollar. (Britannica) People did not have money to buy anything, so "revolution" occurred again. It was the first time for Adolf Hitler to attempt a coup to overthrow the democratic

  1. 'PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OUTWEIGHED IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN POLICY' IN RELATION TO GERMANY IN THE YEARS ...

    Some Historians saw Mein Kampf as a 'blue-print for aggression' which set out in a fair amount of detail Hitler's foreign policy ambitions after 1933. While some historians were prepared to acknowledge that Hitler was an opportunist in the way he approached crises after 1933, most agreed with Bullock that

  2. Unification of Germany - Factors of Success.

    of the German unification movement. As Bismarck said in 1862, "The great question of the day shall not be decided by speeches?? and resolutions?? of the majority, .... which was proven a failure in 1848, .... but by blood and iron."

  1. The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining the status quo through a policy ...

    In turn this would reduce any demands thus maintaining the status quo. Furthermore since the Kaiser dominated German politics and society he can keep things the same however according to Chris Clark his main aim consisted of ?increasing the political neutral middle ground and right thinking majority meaning that he

  2. The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining the status quo through a policy ...

    A prime example of Kaiser dominance can be found during the Zabern Affair, when a German army officer offended the locals of Zabern and even went as far to assault an old, crippled man, this sparked an uproar in Zabern to which the Kaiser did not even react to and

  1. How far do you agree that the limited appeal of Mazzini's ideas was the ...

    Thus it made it easier for the Church to keep control of the peasants and prevent any ideas of unification from spreading. Another reason for Mazzini?s limited appeal was that his ideas were too intellectual for most people to grasps which meant that his people could not support him as they could not understand his beliefs.

  2. How significant was foreign influence in shaping Italian political and social development in the ...

    introduction of the Austrian constitution two days later was the signal for northern Italy to try to shake off Austrian domination."[5] It was the establishment of a constitution in Vienna that encouraged Italians in the north to engage with revolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work