• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining political status quo through a policy of moderate reform in the years before WWI. How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Charlotte Phillips The political establishment in Germany succeeded in maintaining political status quo through a policy of moderate reform. How far do you agree with this judgement? The political status quo in Germany was successfully maintained by the political establishment to a certain extent due to moderate reform by Von Burlow and Bethmann-Hollweg, however would have not been completely successful without the intervention of nationalist foreign policy which ?soaked up? the tension for reform and secured the Burlow Bloc. The success of maintaining the status quo was also marginally down to the lack of unity in the Reichstag, which meant no groups were willing to work together to change the status quo and the constitutional powers held by the Kaiser which meant he held the majority of the power and was never challenged in this period of time. Overall, the most significant reason for the maintenance of the political status quo was moderate reform however; security of this maintenance of the political status quo was due to the other three factors as well. It is clear that the demand for reform was significant in Germany, which was putting a strain on the power of the Kaiser and ruling elites which meant that ...read more.


Von Burlow used the issue of nationalism to convince voters to vote for conservative and liberal groups such as the Pan German League and the Agrarian League by threating the outcome of a red-black victory (alliance of centre and SDP parties). By using nationalism he managed to succeed in getting voters to vote for parties within the Burlow Bloc, which kept socialists at bay thus maintaining the status quo within the Reichstag. Overall nationalism succeeded in maintaining the status quo however would not have been able to maintain it fully without moderate reform as nationalism alone was not a significant enough distraction to completely settle the need for reform of the political status quo. It could be argued that the Kaisers stability in the period was an important reason to factor into the maintenance of the political status quo, as his power was never challenged even when questionable situations arose such as the Daily Telegraph affair. However even though he was a strong figure at the time it was not the most significant reason from the maintenance of the political status quo. The power of the Kaiser was demonstrated during the Daily Telegraph affair in 1908. ...read more.


An example of this is after the Zabern affair, SPD member Philipp Schiedemann demanded that he chancellor resign after the vote of no confidence however other parties in the Reichstag ignored the request. This evidently shows the Reichstag to be lacking unity which ultimately cost them the opportunity to change the political status quo in Germany. This factor was important however not as important as the moderate reforms introduced by the Kaiser because event if the Reichstag was unified in may not have had enough power to stand up to the Kaiser and change the political status quo. In conclusion, it can be seen the policy of moderate reform was important in the maintenance of the political status quo however would not have been completely successful without the achievements of nationalist policy as it succeeded in distracting the nation?s attention away from the need for reform. Disunity in the Reichstag was an effect of Bismarck?s reforms so is not a significant enough reason for the maintenance of the political status quo alone, while the strength of the Kaiser was important it would have not been able to maintain the political status quo without moderate reform as there needed to be a balance between moderate reform and the Kaisers almost autocratic rule inored to keep the political status quo maintained. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Germany, too, paid a fearful price for Hitler's war. Six percent of the prewar population, totaling nearly 7 million, died as a consequence of the war: * 3,250,000 military * 3,640,000 civilians * 2,000,000 post-hostilities expellees. Of all Germans born in 1924, 25 percent were dead by the end of the war, and 31 percent wounded-a casualty rate of more than one in two.


    this merely demonstrated Hitler's 'flexibility of method' which was allied to a 'consistency of aim'. Nazi ideology, to which Hitler's personal contribution was greater than anyone else's, anti-Semitism, enjoyed pride of place alongside the utopian vision of Lebensraum conquered and settled by racially pure German Aryans.

  1. How far was there economic and political stability in Germany in the years 1924-29?

    Stresemann's negotiation and implementation of the Dawes Plan in 1924, to ensure the recovery of the German economy. Under this five-year plan, the Reichsbank (the German National Bank) was reorganised under Allied supervision. Germany received a loan of 800 million gold marks, mainly from the U.S.A which in turn aided economic reconstruction within Germany.

  2. Unification of Germany - Factors of Success.

    the opposition of liberal Parliament members. Besides, he built railways along the Prussian borders?? to ensure that the Prussian army could be mobilized?? swiftly??? and win any lightning war???. f. Bismarck's Skilful Diplomacy: It is often argued that Bismarck's diplomacy was the most contributive factor for the success of German

  1. How far has nationalism changed over the last hundred years?

    higher price for Germany's support than she was willing to at the time. 3. In 1898, Germany began building an imperial fleet capable of challenging the Royal Navy, so that when Britain clashed with France and Russia, Germany would be able to intervene, decisively in any settlement.ii By considering her

  2. How significant was foreign influence in shaping Italian political and social development in the ...

    introduction of the Austrian constitution two days later was the signal for northern Italy to try to shake off Austrian domination."[5] It was the establishment of a constitution in Vienna that encouraged Italians in the north to engage with revolution.

  1. How far do you agree that the limited appeal of Mazzini's ideas was the ...

    Thus it made it easier for the Church to keep control of the peasants and prevent any ideas of unification from spreading. Another reason for Mazzini?s limited appeal was that his ideas were too intellectual for most people to grasps which meant that his people could not support him as they could not understand his beliefs.

  2. Causes of WWI and the roles of Women before WW1

    It is with these demands for political rights that the suffragette movement turns militant, with the destruction of / attack on private property. A famous martyred suffragette is Emily Wilding Davison. Her martyring actions resulted in worldwide publicity. Emmeline Pankhurst equated this fight for political rights to a civil war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work