• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Problems of the Weimar Republic and the Path to War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Aaron Jordan Andrew Thomas In 1918 towards the end of the Second World War, imperial Germany was ruled by Kaiser Wilhelm II and secretly the High Command. The High Command, under Ludendorff and Hindenburg, sensed the inevitability of defeat and tried to ease their way towards an armistice with the Allies. However not before considering one last ditch stand against the allies. (1) In the events that occurred, the Kaiser abdicated on the 9th of November with massive munity?s occurring all over Germany, mainly at Kiel and Wilhelmshaven with the German naval fleet. Councils had appeared in Berlin and Cologne (2) and down in the south in Munich, Kurt Eisner declared Bavaria as an independent republic. (3) On the 9th of November Fredich Ebert took over from Prince Max of Baden as the Chancellor of Germany. On top of the Reichstag building in Berlin, Philip Scheidemann spoke to the people ?The old and rotten ? the monarchy ? has broken down. Long live the new! Long live the German Republic!? (4) ...read more.

Middle

This proved however to be a major mistake in the coming months and years. The army in essence should always remain apolitical, something that is highly important especially with the birth of a new Republic. The Reichswehr in that time was always seen as having right wing views with deep beliefs of Prussian militarism, the army remained wedded in sympathy to the past and aspired to a restoration of a strongly nationalist Germany. (8) Erbert had even authorised the recruitment of volunteer forces to keep order should a crisis arrive, the forces became known as the Freikorps who were ex-soldiers many of whom had served in the First World War. (9) However at first it seemed Erbert was justified in his decision. In January 1919 the Spartacists (now called the KPD) attempted an armed revolution in Berlin as to which the Freikorps brutally put down the revolution. The Freikorps along with the army quashed any communist resistance throughout the rest of the country and even made their way to Bavaria where they purged Kurt Eisner?s regime. ...read more.

Conclusion

His successor, Bauer, eventually agreed to accept the treaty. (13) The Republican ministers Muller and Bell who signed the treaty were widely criticised in Germany so much so that it was claimed that German armies had not been defeated by the enemy, but betrayed by the secret enemy, the socialist and the Jew. The myth of the ?Stab in the back? (Dolchstoss) was born. (14) Germany as a result of the treaty lost several eastern territories, the signing of the war guilt clause, reparation payments which were viewed by J.M Keynes who believed the reparation payment was three times greater than it should have been. The army was reduced to 100,000 men with conscription abolished. It is no wonder then in Berlin January 1920 that Dr Kapp and certain army officers hatched a plot to gain control of Berlin, otherwise known as the Kapp Putsch. They were attempting to set up a military dictatorship in Germany. The government as expected tried to request the help needed in crushing the rebellion, the army leaders refused. General Von Seeckt responded ? Reichswehr does not fire on Reichswehr?. (15) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The author has very strong knowledge of the early days of the German republic and uses a good level of detail throughout. However, this answer often slips into narrative, rather than linking points to the question and explaining why there were problems in the early days and whether solutions were found. 3 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 22/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    Interpretation D shows that Napoleon concentrated heavily on taxation and conscription, ?The latter?administration problem?. Interpretation D supports the view that the Empire?s subject nations were merely a means to maintaining his army and namely the Napoleonic Empire. As interpretation A also suggests with calling Napoleon ?reminiscent of a warrior overlord?.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    Calonne had to also find some means to overcome the financial crisis, which had brought him to the point of proposing broader reforms in the first place. The immediate problem was to find money to pay off short-term debt falling due to redemption in between 1787 and 1797.

  1. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    These social effects link with the economic effects because without the output from factories and the money coming in from selling it they were able to build new houses and help those people who were not rich enough to help themselves.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    What legacy however, does Bismarck's work and character leave behind? The character of Bismarck clearly helped form the Germany of the beginning of the twentieth century, but how much of this was purely Bismarck and purely Prussia is open to debate.

  1. What impact did war have on the French Revolution 1789-1799?

    seize power, as they did with the Girondins in June 1793, portraying them as traitors to France due to their former cooperation with the King and many of their leaders deserting to the Austrians. The war was going so badly and was against such odds that the Jacobins knew that order must be laid out in the country.

  2. How far do you agree that opposition to the Weimar Government In the years ...

    The weakness of the government was a reason for opposition in the years 1918-32. The economy during the Weimar period was affected by the Treaty of Versailles. The occupation of the Ruhr in 1923 was when Germany had failed to pay its reparations, and as a result French troops marched

  1. German horror at the terms of the Treaty of Versailles was the result of ...

    The treaty was nowhere near as severe as Clemenceau had wanted it; he proposed to extend the French border to the Rhine or annexed the Saar coalfields and created an independent Rhine land which again suggests that Germany got off lightly and did not suffer as much as it could have.

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    There are two basic arguments with appeasement. The first suggests that it was a weak policy that fed Hitler?s appetite for more territorial demands in Europe. This may have been the case and it is likely that Hitler invaded Poland thinking that the British would accept this when in fact they did not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work