The Quiet American: An Ironic Historical Criticism.

Authors Avatar

The Quiet American: An Ironic Historical Criticism

By Mitchell McIlwain (Reviewer for “Viewpoint”)

Graham Greene’s novel “The Quiet American” is set amidst the turbulent backdrop of French Indo-China in the early 1950’s.  It is a political thriller and is extremely effective in highlighting the conflicting political views of the time and the extraordinary lengths people will go to in defending what they believe in.  The author’s viewpoint is quite ironic given this novel was written between 1952 and 1954, almost a decade before America’s full scale involvement in Vietnam.  It is a very honest and compelling historical account in which Greene comments on power, human nature, political ideologies, social class, race and gender amongst other things.  Each of them will be addressed in turn.

Power is exerted by several groups and in different ways throughout the novel.  The communist party are demonstrating their increasing power with their control over increasing territories and it being unsafe to travel in the country at night.  The attack against the watch tower was a direct example of this.  The French continued to exert their influence over Vietnam during this period though it was acknowledged that they were fighting a losing battle.  It was mentioned several times in the novel that the local police played a significant role in society.  The Americans who had unofficially been supporting the French began to increase their power through the support of the “third force”.  It was the central character, Alden Pyle, in his blind devotion to the promotion of western democracy in the east that illustrated this power.  Thus evident that power is a significant discourse in the novel.

Join now!

Human nature is a prominent discourse throughout.  Pyle is so determined and convinced of the need to promote democracy that he believes bloodshed is inevitable.  When the bomb exploded in the plaza killing innocent civilians Pyle commented ”They were only war casualties…It was a pity, but you can’t always hit your target.  Anyway they died in the right cause.  In a way you could say they did it for democracy.”

In contrast, Thomas Fowler, the cynical reporter maintained throughout that he was impartial, that his role was to observe and report objectively.  However witnessing the plaza bombing he did ...

This is a preview of the whole essay