• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The Revolution in 1905 was the result not of insufferable conditions but of irreconcilable attitudes' How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


'The Revolution in 1905 was the result not of insufferable conditions but of irreconcilable attitudes' How far do you agree? Immediately it must be said that the 'insufferable conditions' in Russia - predominantly the poor living standards of the working class - did also play a significant part in Revolution coming about in 1905, contrary to the implication of the above statement. That said, the 'irreconcilable attitudes' of the Tsar and the government also had a large part to play. On Bloody Sunday the Tsar was not present at the Winter Palace to deal with the trouble. While it isn't possible to tell whether his absence made the eventually, bloody result of the march on the Winter Palace any more or less likely, it is clear that his handling of the situation was poor. He should undoubtedly have been there, in the nerve centre of politics, at a time of such social tension and, furthermore, he only exacerbated the situation after it had happened by having the audacity to forgive the marchers when clearly it was the government who had overreacted to what was a peaceful protest. ...read more.


The inferiority of the Russian army was highlighted when they had a whole large section of their fleet sunk in a single afternoon. The humiliation of the unprecedented defeat to a Far Eastern power angered the patriotic public and drove them towards revolution. National minorities in Russia continued their opposition to the Russian in the face of sustained 'Russification' against them. By the policy, originally from Alexander III, national minorities living in Russia or within her spheres of influences had all aspects of Russian culture forces upon them. They were essentially expected to renounce their own culture in favour of a Russian one in areas such as language, religion, education and law, an idea that was obviously met with great opposition. These people was further angered when, after having hope that Nicholas might end the policy, he simply continued the work of his predecessor. However the poor conditions of everyday life in Russia at this time meant 'insufferable conditions' cannot be discounted as a factor. The events of Bloody Sunday also imply that the urban workers had issues with the state of Russia beyond political qualms, as they were marching on the Winter Palace in order to present a petition that they had collected demanding an improvement in their living standards. ...read more.


Information about politics was not widely available to them, especially the rural peasantry, and even if it had been their low literacy rate would have prevented most from understanding it. They instead concentrated on the day to day living of their and it was ultimately when this was affected and living conditions were at an insufferable level that they made a stand against the government. In conclusion it can be said that the two themes of factors mentioned in the statement played a roughly equal part in bringing about the 1905 Revolution. Each of the groups involved in the revolution - the liberals, the middle class and the working class - each had their own agendas with those of the liberals and middle being associated with 'irreconcilable attitudes' and those of the working class being linked with 'insufferable conditions', though obviously there would have been overlap between the two. Without any of these three groups the Revolution would not have been what it was, particularly the lower class as they gave the anti-government movement the numbers and support it needed to be considered a revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905?

    Although the importance of the war in causing the revolution can be questioned when considering that the war ended in September 1905, not as a concession by the Nicholas II, who obviously didn't think it was significant enough in causing the revolution justify immediately withdrawal, even though he did take other measures such as the October manifesto.

  2. How far was the Russo-Japanese war responsible for the 1905 revolution?

    They took to methods of terrorism and propaganda to overthrow Tsardom and his society. They also wrote many articles in the newspapers to demean the Tsar. Nihilism lacked a positive programme to reform society. Gradually in the 1860's to 1870's Nihilism was part placed and part combined with Populism.

  1. Impact of the Russian revolution - Ideology matters.

    What had gone wrong? The second failure of the Marxist promise involved the inability of the world's proletariat to prevent war and its rejection of internationalism for nationalism. It had been a common belief among those of all political stripes from the far right to the far left, that socialist influence on the proletariat had made a major European war impossible.

  2. How far do you agree that the Russo Japanese war was the biggest cause ...

    whole nation, the principle of autocracy.? This once again enraged the majority of the population, they had seen the problems autocracy had caused and were hoping that Nicholas would notice this as well.

  1. Russian failure during the Russo-Japanese war was the principal catalyst for Revolution in Russia ...

    grain and fuel and the Trans-Siberian railway was used predominantly for the war effort. This in itself would have increased hardship in the lives of ordinary Russian people and decreased support for the Tsar?s war, thus further suggesting that the Russo-Japanese war was indeed a significant catalyst for Revolution in Russia.

  2. Alexander III bequeathed Russia a revolution. How far do you agree with this statement?

    Alexander III further increased political tensions when he tried to unify Russia through Russification, thereby pushing Russia further toward revolution. Russification was not new to Russia but it was the intensity of Alexander's policy that made it different after 1881.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work