• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The rise of Fascism was due more to the personality of Mussolini than the failures of Liberal Italy" Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Milan Pejnovic D. 11/05/04 pejnovm@students.markham.edu.pe "The rise of Fascism was due more to the personality of Mussolini than the failures of Liberal Italy" Discuss. In 1922, Mussolini became the prime minister of Italy. This meant the end of Liberal Italy, and the rise of Fascism. Mussolini managed to do this because of his incredible personality, one which helped him be an excellent politician. On the other hand, Liberal Italy failed to fulfill national expectancy, also helping in the rise of Mussolini. The question here is which of the two was more important to the rise of Fascism. The key factors inside Mussolini's personality are: his leadership, personal skills, his opportunism and pragmatism, anti-communism and the use of violence. On the other side of the argument we have the key factors for the failures of Liberal Italy: lack of leadership, failure of the parliamentary system, the economic effects of the war, social unrest dew to economic problems and the failure to put down the communist threat. Augusto De Marsanich said: "only the intellect and will of Mussolini can still control and direct us." Mussolini was a natural leader and politician. He organized and structured the fascist party in Italy and managed to get representation in such a way that soon he had a lot of support from a large amount of people. ...read more.

Middle

Marshal Diaz reported to have said: "Your majesty, the army will do its duty; however, it would be well not to put it to the test." "Only maniacs never change. New facts call for new positions" Mussolini was an intuitive person, projecting himself as a flexible pragmatist, which added to his opportunism, aided him to get the help he needed from the various political and social groups. Being a socialist before the war, he discovered that it lacked support in Italy and that he would never get to power. There was too much opposition. So he changed into a pro capitalist, anti-communist supporter. This change brought him more support and acceptance. He also changed from extremist to moderate, depending on the needs. While the "ras" were asking for a complete Fascist revolution, he decided to take a more moderate stance and accept the king's proposal for him to become the head of the government. He knew which position to take and when to take it, having no real ideology but gaining and maintaining power. Furthermore, Fascism also adopted some left wing policies in order to gain the support of the groups who had once sympathized with the socialists and communists. ...read more.

Conclusion

His harshness and his anti-communist views won him the support of the property owners, businessmen and the Church, who had "fear of a revolution". On the other hand, the government "turned a blind eye" (Richard Thurlow) to the left wing upheavals in Milan and Turin. By doing nothing, they left space for the Fascists to act. The government had decided to make a "social appeasement" (Richard Thurlow), thinking that intervention would create more public unrest. This position taken by the government "encouraged the disaffected middle class to turn to the squadristi for adequate protection." What they really did was give the opportunity to the Fascist to prove themselves more valuable than the government in charge, thus forcing King Emmanuel to invite Mussolini to form his Government. In conclusion, after analyzing Mussolini's personality and the failures of Liberal Italy, a sensible consensus can be established between both of the factors. It is clear that the failures of Liberal Italy created a scenario full of social, economical and political problems. But it is also clear that not anyone would have managed to gain power and put the Fascists into the government. The fascists needed both to accomplish their rise to power. Both factors complement each other. They needed the unstable scenario left by Liberal Italy and also needed someone who had the right personality to grab power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    And in this it succeeded.' 54 The Congress also created little hard feeling and dispute that the whole of Europe did not all go to war at once for a century, until World War I. Schroeder notes that '1815 is the one and only time in European history when statesmen

  2. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    These years were called "the years of stagnation". The Munich putsch taught Hitler to stick to elections rather then revolutions. Hitler wrote in a letter from prison in 1923, "When I resume active work it will be necessary to pursue a new policy...Any lawful process is slow.

  1. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    The government had failed to act to the violence allowing the Fascists to exploit this upheaval. Mussolini announced that if the government would not stand against the violence then his squads would. This helped to gain support from the revolution fearing Italians.

  2. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    The Fascist Party has primarily been presented as a 'catch-all party' maintained with hierarchical vigour, as stated above. Incidentally this contributed massively to their following. Blinkhorn again emphasises Mussolini's influence on his opponents, believing that 'Fascism obtained power not through revolution but as the result of Mussolini's compromise with conservative and ostensibly liberal interests' (3).

  1. Features of Fascism

    Mussolini had succeeded in achieving his first main objective that the new coalition government was generally accepted by liberals and indeed several trade unions and left-wing politicians. Mussolini's road to dictatorial power stemmed from the speed in which he became Prime Minister reflecting how the general disgust with the previous government influenced Parliament to act quickly to solve the problem.

  2. How Secure was Liberal Italy in 1914?

    Without a competent workforce, Italy would not be able to improve economically, meaning it had no way to match the other major powers in Europe or even just improve the country from it's present position. With few natural resources, it was going to be very difficult for Italy to advance economically.

  1. "The Personality Of Mussolini Was The Main Factor In His Rise To Power"

    "...passionate and unruly, he cannot adapt himself to the life of school..." He was a very restless man; he wanted things to happen quickly. Everyday he tried to be violent in some form. Mussolini did gain a lot of support because of his personality.

  2. To what extent was Fascism in Italy a revolutionary system that totally transformed the ...

    Not long after the elections, the Matteotti crisis2 led to widespread disaffection and "left Mussolini vulnerable, having been forced to dismiss numerous members of his entourage."[5] The Aventine Secession saw the opposition parties set up a rival parliament in the hope that the king would dismiss Mussolini from office, however,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work