• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

The Role and Importance of the Media in Vietnam

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Vlad Lodoaba IB HISTORY HL COURSEWORK The Role and Importance of the Media in Vietnam Word Count: 2825 Contents: 1 -Introduction p3 2-The Media and The Government p3 3-The Media and Public Opinion p8 4-Conclusion p13 5-Appendix (images) p14 (all images are (c) their respective owners) 6-Bibliography p15 1-Introduction I will not try to deal in this essay with the media's coverage of the Vietnam war. That would be impossible, if not because of the sheer volume of information, coming from one news agency only, because of the diversity of information and not seldom the contradictory facts different reporters and news agencies present. There were more than 6501 accredited journalists in Vietnam between 1964 and 1973. I will try to analyze, in as much depth as the scope of the essay allows, the relations between the media and government and military officials, the impact the media had on the American public and lastly 1 will try to establish whether it was indeed the media that lost the war for the United States. My use of primary sources (specially the newspapers of the times or TV footage of the war) however will be limited, because of the difficult access to such sources as well as the limited perspective they offer in relation to the "bigger picture" of the war. 2-The Media and the Government With regards to the media, the Vietnam war has been known as the "living-room war". It was the first TV war2, a war in which the footage from one day's battle would be in millions of Americans' rooms within twelve hours, and it has been maintained that it was indeed this very close media coverage that influenced public opinion, eventually turning it against the war. ...read more.

Middle

It simply made it more aware of what was going on in Vietnam, and even at that point, many Americans still wanted an escalation, rather than a de-escalation of the war7. What probably made the relations between the media and the military so difficult was the outrageous optimism of many superior officers. Gen. Harkins, the commander of the MCAV (Military Assistance Command, Vietnam) between 1962-1964, was characterized by an unrealistic optimism and Halberstam writes - the high command of the MCAV became a place "isolated and eventually insulated from reality". It is worthwhile noting that many of the superior officers now were junior officers in World War II, which was eventually catastrophic for two reasons: firstly it was inconceivable for them that America, the world's super-power could lose a war, and secondly they were by no means able to make feasible decisions in a war they had never seen before, such as the guerilla and psychological warfare in Vietnam. The ever-optimistic Harkins was replaced in 1964 by Gen. W. Westmoreland. Although more realistic, it was difficult even for him to asses the situation without any front lines. Westmoreland was also a believer in "the big war" and an attrition warfare that would eventually exhaust "Communist" resources. In his relations to the media, however, he was by no means friendly and he took every chance he got to criticize the press, specially David Halberstam and Maleom Brown especially: Finding fault was one way to achieve the sensational and finding fault with an oriental regime with little background in or respect for Western style democracy was easy ...when their peers back home rewarded them with a shared Pulitzer price, the pattern for those who followed was set. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also what people tend to ignore today is that the photograph of the VC suspect being shot was contextualized so as to aid the US effort, and it was presented as the execution of a member of the VC suspected for several American deaths. When it comes to photographs, it was not the images themselves, but their subsequent incorporation in the anti-war effort that created the illusion that the written press was against the war. Pictures as these, argues Caroline Brothers, have been taken as early as 1962, but were widely rejected by the editors exactly because of their contents, which was not compatible with what the public wanted to see at that time. It appears, therefore, that the images that changed history can only surface when the mood of the public is ripe, hence they exist to reflect and not influence public opinion towards war. 4-Conclusion It is easy to accuse the media for the loss of public support in Vietnam. After thc media's massive blunder of reporting the Tet offensive as a major psychological defeat, and not having "the sophistication, integrity or courage to admit their error"14 (which is actually justifiable by the distrust the media had for official reports) opposition to war rose sharply. Still, the media cannot be singled out as the main cause. Nicholas Hopkinson's statement is the one that probably best reflects the situation of the media in Vietnam: As public enthusiasm faded, reporting became more and more critical[...] but to single the media out as the decisive element in declining public opinion is incorrect. US opinion turned against the war because it was long unsuccessful, costly in terms o/human life and expenditure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    Mikhail Gorbachev came to power with two main problems: the disastrous state of the Soviet economy and the strains of the Cold War. Gorbachev realised that these problems were interrelated. * The Soviet economy was bankrupt because it could not afford to support communist countries all over the world AND compete with the USA in the nuclear arms race.

  2. America In Vietnam, 1953-73

    January 11 1969 March 15 1969 Withdraw all troops immediately - 19% 21% Withdraw all by end of 1970 - 22% 25% Withdraw troops but no time limit - 40% 38% Send more troops and step up fighting - 11% 7% No opinion - 8% 9% June 28 1969 US made a mistake sending troops to fight in Vietnam?

  1. How far was the Tet Offensive a turning point in the outcome of the ...

    This had increased over the years and although the Tet gained media attention it is likely that public opposition would have continued to increase anyway, due to the issues of the Draft, bodybags and national expense. It is questionable how much effect public opinion had on the conduct of the

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    In Fatahland, on the foothills of Mount Hermon, up to 15,000 guerrillas were trained to carry out attacks on Israel. Because it was skeptical about the willingness and capability of the Lebanese Army to implement the Shtawrah Accord by displacing the PLO in southern Lebanon and securing the border area,

  1. American History.

    Pennsylvania itself was actually founded by Quakers when in 1681 Charles II? gave the region to his friend William Penn, who then held it as a personal proprietorship. Penn used his colony as a haven for fellow Quakers [who were radical egalitarians and denied the need for clergy] but also

  2. 'War seldom resolves the causes of conflict' Analyze this claim with reference to a ...

    But Hitler responded by invading these small weak states. This shows that the Treaty of Versailles failed to resolve the causes of conflict and in certain aspects it was counter productive, creating more hostility and instability which led to World War Two. A.J.P Taylor confirms this: "the first war explains the second and, in fact, caused it, in so far one event causes another" (4)

  1. The Vietnam War – G.C.S.E. History Coursework

    Also, a young child is watching. Source 12 would have been very good evidence for any member or supporter of the AWM. Some newspapers could have used this to portray America's role; killing innocent civilians in the vain attempt of flushing out Viet Cong guerrilla forces -sheer brutality.

  2. Did the TET offensive (1968) impact the conflict in Vietnam

    ?This anti-war movement had a great impact on American foreign policy and essentially forced the US out of Vietnam?..By 1968, protesters numbered almost seven million with more than half being white youths in college." With vast numbers protesting against the war, it became clear to the government that it was not in their best interest to stay in the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work