• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Russian Revolutions of 1917

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Russian Revolutions of 1917 Kevin James Patrick McKay 1. The revolutions of 1917 were brought about by a number of long and short term factors. Long term factors Over 80% of all Russians were agricultural workers. They were living in what we would know today as a "third world" lifestyle. Low life expectancy, constant manual labour and a very isolated state of being. They were allowed to own land from 1861 however they paid vast sums back to the land owners or to the crown. Little was left for their own needs. The town workers (Proletariat) were a small but crucial group making up 10% of the population. They would work on average a 14-16 hour day and worked in appalling conditions. Ethnic minorities were targeted by a policy of nationalisation known as "Russification" they were forced to learn Russian and to convert to the Russian Orthodox church. The Russian Orthodox Church fully supported the devine right of the Tsars rule. Russians believed Tsar had been chosen by god. The Tsar ruled absolutely through heredity bloodline. It was an outdated and corrupt regime. He chose his Imperial Council and his Cabinet of ministers had been chosen by his Imperial Council. The Ministers basically ran the country while the Tsar (Nicholas II) had a life greatly contrasting to that of his people. He was a weak leader however stongly conservative. The revolutionaries inspired the workers to rise. ...read more.

Middle

The provisional government asked for soviet support and armed them with 40,000 guns (extension sheet 1), this meant the soviets now had a mass of weapons at there disposal. The germans aided the Bolsheviks and printed leaflets directed towards front-line troops urging them to desert (Shukman handout). The Provisional Government tried to arrest Lenin on charges of fraternising with the Germans . Lenin escaped to Finland and returned in April aided by the Germans in a sealed train car (Communism On-line : Lenin Biography). Lenin denounced the Provisional Governement and called all socialists in support of the Bolsheviks. Also he urged peasants to take the land from the landlords and industrial workers to seize control of the factories. (April Theses Schoolnet). Also in march the Petrograd Soviet ordered all soldiers to obey the Soviet. The Provisional Government had a great weakness due to the existence of the Ispolkom, this was a large committee of Soviets. This contained elected representatives from the proletariat, the peasants and soldiers. This meant that Russia had "two governments". The soldiers would only follow the governments orders if it did not contradict those of the Ispolkom (extension sheet 1). Bolshevik Success The Bolsheviks gained support automatically for their reluctance to continue the war effort. Lenin was a determined leader who could enforce policies to which most of the population were wanting to hear. "Peace, bread and land!" This in itself was popular, the soldiers badly wanted peace, fighting a war they could not win. ...read more.

Conclusion

(G Wath - Russian Civil War 2000) Also Bolshevik success was due to their highly motivated ideology. All of the Bolsheviks knew exactly what they were fighting for, conversely the Whites were a compromised force of politically contrary beliefs. The famine of 1921 killed around 5 million people in Russia. This was caused by two factors a major drought and the Bolshevik requisitioning programme which controlled how much the peasants could plant and "war communism" removed their surplus crops. The fact the Red Army were successfully supplied with food meant shortages in major cities and rationing. The Kronstadt rising summarized the animosity of the people towards the Bolsheviks. These sailors were previously seen as Bolshevik legends and heros. Trotsky had described them as the "pride and glory of the revolution". These sailors were demanding exactly what the Bolsheviks had asked for only a short time earlier; political freedom, chose and change occupations, elect their own representatives etc. They did not want to abolish the Soviet State however they insisted they did not want a one-party state. Trotsky gave the order and the rising was crushed, the revolting sailors were shot in cold-blood. A New Economic Policy (NEP) was announced and this allowed peasants to sell surplus foods for profit and factories with less than 20 workers would be back under the owners control. This was a swift response and it worked. Food production increased and industrial output soared. The "economic carrot" ensured peasants and factory workers were content and the "political stick" ensuring the destruction of all opposition through censorship and a secret police secured the Revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Consequently some historians claim that Stalin's brutalities must have stemmed from a source, as Simon Hartfree claims that "High Stalinism appears as the logical and inevitable outcome of Leninism"21 as he argues that Lenin's actions such as the use of Terror and purges, paved the way for the brutalities of Stalinism.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    His loyalty was, moreover, to Lenin and not to the abstract entity known as the Bolshevik Party. Had Lenin not returned from Zurich and had Stalin, Kamenev and Muranov kept the party on its conciliationist path, there is an excellent chance that Sverdlov would have directed his formidable talents towards some other internationalist and pro-Soviet organization.

  1. Did the Russians revolutions improve the lives of ordinary Russians, 1914-1924?

    In March 1917 people from all over Russia and from all classes rioted the streets this caused the Tsar to abdicate. After the Tsar abdicated a Provisional Government took over. This was supposed to be a temporary Government led by Alexander Kerensky but they didn't let Russia elect a new Government.

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    With the help of his ministers, the church and the army, who all helped to limit resistance to his rule, it is possible to list the ways in which Nicholas II secured his position as Csar: Most of the peasants were controlled by 'mirs' which were under land captains appointed by the Csar.

  1. Causes of the 1917 russian revolution

    While much of Europe was switching to liberal democracy (freedoms, rights and rule by the people) and advancing rapidly, Russia remained an absolute monarchy where the royalty ruled, even if they were unqualified to do so. This old fashioned government prevented Russia from advancing.

  2. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 was potentially the most politically formative event of ...

    Partial involvement was due to the sudden withdrawal of Russia from the First World War, and the store of arms and weaponry which had been amassed in the region. Further, with Lenin's communist ideals came the firm decision to refuse to acknowledge Russia's debts, and to isolate the country (with the exception of the Comintern)

  1. Why did the Revolutions of 1848 did not lead to a united Germany?

    A generation before, the German states were grouped by the Holy Roman Empire, and they were used to seeing a Habsburg leading them. Even Fredrick William IV was a traditionalist, he believed in the divine right of Kings and the authority of Austria because all his predecessors had thought this so he had no reason to change.

  2. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    Rasputin made these predictions before the tzar made his decision to enter the World War, so perhaps if Nicholas II would have listened to Rasputin, and believed in his paranormal skills, Russia would have been spared of the terrors of war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work