• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Schlieffen Plan

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Online Assignment Number One The Schlieffen Plan CHY 4UW Miss Blom Magdalena Nowakowska Thursday February 15, 2007 Questions: 1. a) In Source A, what does Crown Prince Wilhelm mean by the following statement: "This view of life is un-German and does not suit us." (3) In Source A, by the statement "This view of life is un-German and does not suit us", Crown Prince Wilhelm speaks of the German lifestyle and how the German love their people. He referred to how at this time, the Germans are living in an economic and cultural accomplishment and advantage, however, this bragging has a backfire on the German people. If you are truly hopeful and believe in the success and future of your homeland, economic prosperity can manifest itself. However, this type of thinking can be unbeneficial as it may be blind to issues throughout the country and nationwide. b) What message is portrayed by Source E? ...read more.

Middle

The purpose of the document depicted in source D is to give the Belgian answer of allowing or not allowing Germany's passage, when the purpose of source C would be to alarm and frighten Belgium into allowing Germany to pass through their country. Content of document in source C would include topics meant to 'push' Belgium into allowing Germany to pass through their country, as it depicts Germany as a very strong and powerful country. The content of document in Source D is that it's trying to make the country of Belgium seem strong and courageous. Source D is always stating the England would help Belgium, and come to defend them. 3. With reference to their origins and purpose, assess the value and limitations of Sources B and D to historians studying the outbreak of WWI. (8) With reference to the origins and purpose of Sources B and D, the value and limitations of each source have a good use for historians studying the outbreak of WWI. ...read more.

Conclusion

During this time period, the government was using propaganda, and leaders were disagreeing on many subjects. They seemed to have been 'bulling' each other. For example, Germany was trying to persuade Belgium to allow them to pass through their country to attack France, and Belgium insisted that Britain would come to defend them. All of these issues caused pressure on the countries of Europe. Nevertheless, the Europeans were certain they couldn't be harmed, and were they ever wrong. If Austria-Hungary would have listened to Germany's suggestion to get friendlier relations with Russia, they may have become allies and maybe negotiated more, helping to prevent the war. Serbia could have accepted the Ultimatum, and killed the murderers of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Also, Great Britain could have decided and stated which side of the battle they were on. If this would have happened, the Austrians and Germans could have possibly been frightened off and delayed the war. Therefore, if the countries would have possible communicated more, the outbreak of World War One may have been inevitable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    All these things led to stalemate because the Germans had to fight a war on two fronts which meant they had massive strain on their resources meaning it was harder for them to push. Both sides were also equally matched as they saw this from the Battle of Marne.

  2. Causes of WWI.

    So, they were firing over 100,000 shells a day; relentless, relentless banging and booming of this tremendous bombardment. So loud, you could hear it in England, if the wind was in the right direction (60 or 70 miles away). Over million soldiers were killed on both sides only in a single battle of Somme during 1916.

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    The difficulties of trench warfare were always the same. Firstly there was barbed wire in no man's land between the two lines of opposing trenches which the attacking side tried to clear away by a massive artillery bombardment - but this removed any chance of a quick surprise attack, since the enemy always had plenty of warning.

  2. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    The British army was equipped and ready for action within a week. The Germans had dismissed the British Expeditionary Force due to its small size, however, the British also proved Germany wrong when they fought with, and defended Belgium. Despite this, by December of 1914 half of the BEF were dead.

  1. The Marshall Plan.

    at extracting accurate lessons from his reading and from his own experience. In many respects, Marshall sought during World War II to avoid the mistakes he had witnessed in World War I and its immediate aftermath. Consequently, Marshall was increasingly disturbed after the autumn of 1945 at what he considered

  2. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    * Vickers machine gun: Crew of 6; 500 rounds/min; range: 2285; weighed 23kg. * Lewis gun: mobile & light: Crew: 2; weighed under 13kg; fired from shoulder. 600-700rpm. * Mortars: fired an explosive bomb, effective for long & medium distances - dugouts and earthworks * Hand grenades were part of trench warfare and used in close fighting.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work