• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Schlieffen Plan

Extracts from this document...


Online Assignment Number One The Schlieffen Plan CHY 4UW Miss Blom Magdalena Nowakowska Thursday February 15, 2007 Questions: 1. a) In Source A, what does Crown Prince Wilhelm mean by the following statement: "This view of life is un-German and does not suit us." (3) In Source A, by the statement "This view of life is un-German and does not suit us", Crown Prince Wilhelm speaks of the German lifestyle and how the German love their people. He referred to how at this time, the Germans are living in an economic and cultural accomplishment and advantage, however, this bragging has a backfire on the German people. If you are truly hopeful and believe in the success and future of your homeland, economic prosperity can manifest itself. However, this type of thinking can be unbeneficial as it may be blind to issues throughout the country and nationwide. b) What message is portrayed by Source E? ...read more.


The purpose of the document depicted in source D is to give the Belgian answer of allowing or not allowing Germany's passage, when the purpose of source C would be to alarm and frighten Belgium into allowing Germany to pass through their country. Content of document in source C would include topics meant to 'push' Belgium into allowing Germany to pass through their country, as it depicts Germany as a very strong and powerful country. The content of document in Source D is that it's trying to make the country of Belgium seem strong and courageous. Source D is always stating the England would help Belgium, and come to defend them. 3. With reference to their origins and purpose, assess the value and limitations of Sources B and D to historians studying the outbreak of WWI. (8) With reference to the origins and purpose of Sources B and D, the value and limitations of each source have a good use for historians studying the outbreak of WWI. ...read more.


During this time period, the government was using propaganda, and leaders were disagreeing on many subjects. They seemed to have been 'bulling' each other. For example, Germany was trying to persuade Belgium to allow them to pass through their country to attack France, and Belgium insisted that Britain would come to defend them. All of these issues caused pressure on the countries of Europe. Nevertheless, the Europeans were certain they couldn't be harmed, and were they ever wrong. If Austria-Hungary would have listened to Germany's suggestion to get friendlier relations with Russia, they may have become allies and maybe negotiated more, helping to prevent the war. Serbia could have accepted the Ultimatum, and killed the murderers of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Also, Great Britain could have decided and stated which side of the battle they were on. If this would have happened, the Austrians and Germans could have possibly been frightened off and delayed the war. Therefore, if the countries would have possible communicated more, the outbreak of World War One may have been inevitable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    All these things led to stalemate because the Germans had to fight a war on two fronts which meant they had massive strain on their resources meaning it was harder for them to push. Both sides were also equally matched as they saw this from the Battle of Marne.

  2. The Marshall Plan.

    Marshall insisted that the ERP would reduce the expansion of Soviet influence without the need to resort to overheated rhetoric. Secretary of State Marshall testifies in favor of the Economic Cooperation Act. George C. Marshall's speeches in support of Marshall Plan authorization and funding: 19 December 1947 to the nation

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    In April 1917, the USA declared war on Germany. The American troops had fresh supplies of food and weaponry and new soldiers. Unlike the soldiers in the British army, they would be fresh and ready for war, instead of fighting for four years.

  2. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    Failed to consolidate Brest-Litovsk - Spring Offensives left west overstretched & vulnerable. * Craig: 'lack of fuel' & 'other logistical faults' & insufficient reserves responsible for its failure * An efficient settlement with the Russians would have provided oil from the Caucasus, and freed at least some of the 1.5 million troops needed to control Eastern Europe ?

  1. Causes of WWI.

    After the failure of the German offensive, both sides made various local attempts at achieving breakthroughs. Most of these attempts failed due to the effects of modern weapons. The First World War was the first war to use poison gas as a military weapon.

  2. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    both sides digging trenches to protect themselves from snipers as well as shell fire. Until now, it had been a war of movement, but these were the first signs of the stalemate that was about to come. The German army took the opportunity to select the best available defensive positions

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work