• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

Extracts from this document...


GCSE HISTORY COURSEWORK: Russia Assignment 1: The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923) Ellen Taylor 11E, - Mr Sharpe CONTENTS PAGE: a) Explain Lenin's contribution to the development of the Bolshevik Party up to and including April 1917. b) Explain why Lenin and the Bolsheviks replaced the Provisional Government as leaders of Russia by November 1917. c) The following were equally important reasons why Lenin and the Bolsheviks were able to hold onto power during the Civil War: * Trotsky's organisation of the Red Army * The disunity of the White opposition * War Communism * The leadership qualities of Lenin Explain how far you agree with this statement. Bibliography a) Explain Lenin's contribution to the development of the Bolshevik Party up to and including April 1917. Every successful political party needs a compelling leader, an inspiration, and an originator of ideas. Lenin was a vital source of all these qualities and more for the Russian Bolshevik Party. It was in 1903 that he made his first mark as a leader. At the second Congress of the Social Democratic Party he presented his plan for a revolution and insisted that the Congress agreed to every new and innovative element of it. Lenin was determined to get his own way. He proposed a new form of party, a professional revolutionary organization that would seize power for the working classes and he bullied his ideas into the congress. He was able to out - argue his colleagues because he was sure of his ideas. He caused such a commotion for the Social Democrats that the result of the congress was a split in the Party; the Bolsheviks followed Lenin's proposals and the Mensheviks became a larger more diverse group who rejected his ideas. From the start the Bolsheviks had the minority of supporters, however, it was Lenin's intention to keep the party small at first consisting of only the most dedicated and loyal members. Lenin was undoubtedly the initiator of the Bolshevik Party. ...read more.


The Bolsheviks had appeared to save the Provisional Government, showing that they were not German agents or enemies of Russia as they had sometimes been depicted. The Kornilov Revolt severely upset the delicate balance of power between the Provisional Government and the Soviet and from then on the Provisional Governments position deteriorated. The revolt was a crucial turning point for Lenin and the Bolsheviks In an attempt to regain initiative, Kerensky and the Provisional Government decided to bring forward democratic elections for the Constituent Assembly, which had previously been scheduled to be held after the War. The Assembly was scheduled to meet in January 1918 after elections at the end of 1917. The results of these elections show the true poor level of support of the Bolsheviks at the start of their rule. Therefore the Bolsheviks seizure of power could be seen as illegal and a coup not as a revolution as it did not have the full support of a revolution. The success of the Bolsheviks in 1917 replacing the Provisional Government can be seen as a result of the progressive loss of support and allies of the Provisional Government over the second half of 1917. Lenin and the Bolsheviks may have lacked legitimacy in their seizure of power but, and this is crucial, in Petrograd itself they had a large basis of support among the workers and sailors in the Kronstadt Naval Base just outside Petrograd. This coupled with the existence of the paramilitary Red Guards gave Lenin the opportunity to mount a coup, despite the opposition of leading Bolsheviks such as Zinoviev. The decision to mount the coup was almost exclusively down to Lenin, without him it would not have been possible. Lenin had put the Bolsheviks in a position to capitalise on the Provisional Governments many mistakes and failures and it was clearly a combination of the two that brought the Provisional Government to its end. ...read more.


Newspapers and posters were distributed among the Red Army giving impressions of the Reds invincibility and the harsh consequences of a White victory. However the Whites used this same tactic. The use of 'Red Terror' was also a contributing factor to the Bolshevik victory. The Cheka had been given the power to arrest or execute rivals without trial. Discipline and fear was brought to all those who helped or fought for the White opposition. A prime example is of the murder of the Tsar and his family in 1918, as they were seen as a symbol for the White cause. The majority of the country were peasants and they had a good reason to back the communists. Land had been recently and eventually given to them, and they were none too keen to lose it again so quickly. If the whites had won the Civil War then landowners would instantly demand their land back. There is no doubt that all the factors were important to the success of the Bolsheviks. They each gave the Bolsheviks a unique advantage over the opposition, but without any one of the four mentioned it is fair to say that the Bolsheviks may not have won the Civil War, this means that no factor one was more important than another. However, there is a definite link between the factors showing that one was caused as a result of the other. Without the strong leadership of Lenin, Trotsky would not have been appointed and the policies of War Communism would not have been implemented, and so the Red Army would not have gained the appropriate supplies to become such an effective fighting force against the Whites. If the White Army had been better qualified then the Bolsheviks would have been faced with a greater threat and the war could have gone either way. Therefore I can agree with the statement that each of the reasons were equally important to Lenin's preservation of power through the Civil War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 was potentially the most politically formative event of ...

    The 1907 alliance system in Europe, and also the world as it would be seen after World War One with Woodrow Wilson and his Fourteen Points10 was ever-changing, and as such, the Russian-Revolution was not as culpable for frosty relations later on in the period 1879-1980.

  2. why did revolution in russia break out in 1917

    with able men such as Witte showed that he was out of touch with Russia's real needs. Russia's entry into the First World War only fuelled to the impending revolution in 1917. During the four years of war, the cause of much of Russia's internal problems was an economic one, a problem she cannot sustained caused by the war.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    small advantage, but it will be argued here that this advantage was not decisive. To this end, evidence will be presented that the support of Lenin's own party was largely predicated upon Lenin's pursuit of the broad course of action which he did in fact take.

  2. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    Another failure of the Vienna Settlement was that it excluded significant nations such as Spain, Sweden and Portugal, and hence provides some support for the case for failure. Cavour, Prime Minister of Piedmont commented in 1846 'resting on no principle neither that of legitimacy nor of national interest, nor of

  1. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    What is quite interesting is that nearly the same occurrence happened in Germany during their great depression. There, the Austrian Adolf Hitler took control of government much like Lenin did. They both came from not exactly royal families, and managed to gain extreme power by sheer knowledge of what might excite the public.

  2. How far was the Provisional Government of Russia doomed from the start?

    This was made worse by the food shortages that occurred across the country due to the lack of men to harvest the fields these shortages were particularly prominent in the city?s. The provisional government worsened its position in June 1917 through the June offensive, which was a major assult upon

  1. To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917? ...

    These slogans?facing Russia?s current issues of chronic food shortages, the irrelevant and damaging continuance of the war n Germany, and the issue of land distribution in the rural areas?seemed to create a solution to everyone?s issues quite neatly. The provisional government had slowed solutions to these very prominent issues and

  2. Why did the Tsar lose power in 1917?

    The setting up of the War-industries committee was good because it would link the military and civilian economy together. However it was a mistake from the Tsar as he wasn?t willing to give any of his power up and so the committee was limited and it led people to blame

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work