• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The size of Russia was the most important factor limiting the success of Peter the great(TM)s economic reforms. Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The size of Russia was the most important factor limiting the success of Peter the great's economic reforms. Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. Russia was and still is a large country and communication can be very difficult .I agree this can be seen as one of the most important factors that limited Peter the great's economic reforms but there are many other factors which limited him too. What about serfdom this limited him from being seen as a strong leader and made Russia seem like it was still backward, didn't this limit him more? Furthermore what about foreign competition between Russia and other European countries, many countries have already built up their industry and their imports and exports were seen to be much better, this may have limited Peter making most out of his reforms. There are many other reasons which could have limited Peter even more which could be more seen as greater limitations to his economic reforms. ...read more.

Middle

Communication between Peter and small towns was very hard meaning policies he had put in place were very hard to keep an eye on as transportation was very poor too. All these factors limited Peter as these all contributed to how the size of Russia really did limit him to successfully achieving what he wanted out of these economic reforms. Even though I do agree to some extent the size of Russia did limit him the most, there were other factors which may have been more important to the limitations he faced. Serfdom was one of these. Serfdom was a law code which bound the peasant holding land from a lord, permanently to the state at which he worked. This law limited Peter as it showed Russia was still in political backwardness. The rest of Europe had moved on from serfdom while Russia was still in the grips of it.. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although entrepreneurs could have helped Peter to increase Russian trade they could have limited him too. Entrepreneurs showed the inequality between them and the peasants. Even though there was all this enthusiasm for entrepreneurship it did remain limited but did show the instability of the social structure in Russia and how everyone is not really equal or have the same kind of rights. This includes the serf community who were bound to the government. Overall I agree with the view that the size of Russia was the most important factor limiting the success of Peter the great's economic reforms. Many reasons contributing the size of Russia limited Peter including the poor rivers and canal systems connecting to St Petersburg and Moscow. Although there were many other reasons including serfdom were important to influencing the success of the economic reforms, I believe the size of Russia limited Peter more as communication was hard between leading capitals and some economic changes could not really stretch across the whole of Russia as it was such a large country to sustain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    With Phillip V in the line of succession for the French throne, the unification of Spain and France was on the cards, this is simply something that the other powers in Europe couldn't let happen. A coalition formed of England (later Great Britain), the Holy Roman Empire, the Dutch Empire,

  2. How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the ...

    was far from Labour's socialist goal of breaking down barriers in society, and therefore a limiting factor in their success. The government also tried to implement the 1944 Fleming Report which recommended that 25% of places at public schools should be reserved for pupils with local authority scholarships, but Pearce

  1. Lenins Economic Policies lacked consistency in the period 1918-1924. How far would you ...

    However, even these people only received enough food on which to live. At the bottom of the scale were the people who received barely any food, and these people included the capitalists, landlords and bourgeois. It was said by Zinoviev that "they were given just enough bread so as not to forget the smell of it."

  2. Cities were the main driving force of the Reformation in Germany(TM) " explain whether ...

    Many cities such as Hamburg, was situated on internal and external trade routes. This allowed the message to be spread acutely among the merchant classes. As a result of the towns and cities, Lutheranism was able to spread to all classes of the population, from the illiterate; to the highly educated theologians.

  1. Russian History. A period of great achievement To what extent do you agree with ...

    At the previous change of rule, Sophia may have acted in the interest of her brother, Fedor, as various rumours exist of her pleading the dying Alexis not to proclaim Peter the heir. Fedor?s capability to lead the Russia raised questions, based on his sickly nature and poor health.

  2. The acquisition of Granada in 1492 was the most important factor in securing Isabella ...

    Alternatively, Spain might lose its separate identity and be absorbed into his other territories. Another factor was the protests that began in Toledo and other places; the nobility began to divide into factions, some of which were based on long standing family feuds or were linked to competition for office rather than as a consequence of the national situation.

  1. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    For example: ??Grain shortages, combined with continued forced procurements, led to rural famine??[27] However, some people benefitted from collectivisation such as Bertha Malnick: ?We have more than 600 hectares?our farmers have built 70 new houses for themselves during the last few years??[28].

  2. To What Extent Was Russia Modernised During the Personal Reign of Peter the Great? ...

    Peter investigated the west himself and travelled Europe during the early years of his reign as Tsar of Russia. He then started to disregard the traditional Russian dress and adopted western clothes from 1690; this is the opposite of what his father Alexis had done where he banned Germanic clothing as to detect Germans in church services.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work