• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The size of Russia was the most important factor limiting the success of Peter the great(TM)s economic reforms. Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The size of Russia was the most important factor limiting the success of Peter the great's economic reforms. Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. Russia was and still is a large country and communication can be very difficult .I agree this can be seen as one of the most important factors that limited Peter the great's economic reforms but there are many other factors which limited him too. What about serfdom this limited him from being seen as a strong leader and made Russia seem like it was still backward, didn't this limit him more? Furthermore what about foreign competition between Russia and other European countries, many countries have already built up their industry and their imports and exports were seen to be much better, this may have limited Peter making most out of his reforms. There are many other reasons which could have limited Peter even more which could be more seen as greater limitations to his economic reforms. ...read more.

Middle

Communication between Peter and small towns was very hard meaning policies he had put in place were very hard to keep an eye on as transportation was very poor too. All these factors limited Peter as these all contributed to how the size of Russia really did limit him to successfully achieving what he wanted out of these economic reforms. Even though I do agree to some extent the size of Russia did limit him the most, there were other factors which may have been more important to the limitations he faced. Serfdom was one of these. Serfdom was a law code which bound the peasant holding land from a lord, permanently to the state at which he worked. This law limited Peter as it showed Russia was still in political backwardness. The rest of Europe had moved on from serfdom while Russia was still in the grips of it.. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although entrepreneurs could have helped Peter to increase Russian trade they could have limited him too. Entrepreneurs showed the inequality between them and the peasants. Even though there was all this enthusiasm for entrepreneurship it did remain limited but did show the instability of the social structure in Russia and how everyone is not really equal or have the same kind of rights. This includes the serf community who were bound to the government. Overall I agree with the view that the size of Russia was the most important factor limiting the success of Peter the great's economic reforms. Many reasons contributing the size of Russia limited Peter including the poor rivers and canal systems connecting to St Petersburg and Moscow. Although there were many other reasons including serfdom were important to influencing the success of the economic reforms, I believe the size of Russia limited Peter more as communication was hard between leading capitals and some economic changes could not really stretch across the whole of Russia as it was such a large country to sustain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was warfare between Britain and France the main contributory factor in ...

    3 star(s)

    the Kingdom of Portugal, the Duchy of Savoy and the Spanish loyal to Archduke Charles. France and England were still recovering from the economic battering their previous conflict caused upon them, this perhaps being the reason William III struggled to get support initially for war against France thus being a

  2. 'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster'

    Peasants reacted to the seizure of their grain by burning their houses, slaughtering livestock and eating what food they had left in protest. Socially, collectivization had already gotten off to a bad start; many peasants were not willing to cooperate with the new communist ideas and enthusiastic activists who had suddenly appeared in their villages preaching the new methods.

  1. How Important Were The Policies Of Gorbachev In Bringing An End To The Cold ...

    Within four years, the Soviet Union adopted some political and economic ideas of the West. Gorbachev's policies encouraged reformers in the communist parties of Eastern Europe to encourage similar measures. Aside from Gorbachev's policies of Perestroika and Glasnost, the abandonment of the Brezhnev Doctrine was instigated.

  2. How Successful Were Economic Policies 1933-1939?

    Source two discusses this, 'Rearmament dominated Germany's economy.' However after 1936, Schacht and Hitler had a falling out and Schacht stood down from his role. Hitler decided to bring in the chief of the Luftwaffe, Herman Goering as his replacement, a man who has little to no experience on how economics work.

  1. Russian History. A period of great achievement To what extent do you agree with ...

    His mental ability developed quite nicely, however, as he was taught by Simeon Polotsky. During his brief reign, many historians argue that Fedor actually ?ruled under the protectorate of Sophia his sister.? As his health began to decline, more individuals rose up to counsel Fedor, and Sophia found her influence steadily declining.

  2. The acquisition of Granada in 1492 was the most important factor in securing Isabella ...

    Alternatively, Spain might lose its separate identity and be absorbed into his other territories. Another factor was the protests that began in Toledo and other places; the nobility began to divide into factions, some of which were based on long standing family feuds or were linked to competition for office rather than as a consequence of the national situation.

  1. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    For example; around 100?000 workers died building the Belmor Canal[26]. Collectivisation was ultimately unsuccessful and peasants were in a worse position than ever before. The concept of sharing farms and thus, sharing salary meant there wasn?t enough money to go around and crop production fell too.

  2. To What Extent Was Russia Modernised During the Personal Reign of Peter the Great? ...

    Peter investigated the west himself and travelled Europe during the early years of his reign as Tsar of Russia. He then started to disregard the traditional Russian dress and adopted western clothes from 1690; this is the opposite of what his father Alexis had done where he banned Germanic clothing as to detect Germans in church services.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work