• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The soviet people considered him a failure because they believed he couldn't keep the Soviet Union together therefore it collapsed and unlike Stalin, Gorbachev settled for it.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

*The former soviet people consider him a failure* The soviet people considered him a failure because they believed he couldn't keep the Soviet Union together therefore it collapsed and unlike Stalin, Gorbachev settled for it. In 1985, when Gorbachev became leader the economy was weak. Unlike Stalin, who the people worked for because they feared him, Gorbachev was concerned about the attitude of Soviet people to work, because the happier they were, the harder they would work which would result in the Soviet Union being richer. But it wasn't that simple and there were many problems. There was a worry about alcoholism and chronic alcoholism was a main reason in the decline of the Soviet industry. Soviet goods didn't work properly and Gorbachev complained that the refrigerators they made were 'shoddy'. The economy was being run on a 'trial and error' basis, which would have lost them a lot of money because if the goods weren't working properly then more money would have to be put it to start over again. ...read more.

Middle

This is why he was looked at as a failure. I disagree with this statement. Although the soviet people could see Gorbachev as a failure because of his changing ways I think that he realised that communism and his country was 'wearing out' and decided to do something about it. He was preventing his country from complete failure and protecting them for example, if people in Russia started to rebel against Gorbachev because he wasn't doing anything about his country and letting people suffer by being poor, USA might have seen this as a chance to attack as Gorbachev as he wouldn't have his country to back him up resulting in USA (capitalism) winning. *History will be kinder* I think this statement means that when people look back at what Gorbachev did, they will accept it, as at the time the Soviet people could not. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is believed that no Russian has done more to free his people from bondage since Alexander II who freed the serfs. If a statue of Gorbachev was put in every European capital then it would be a sign of significance and show how respected he actually is. I agree with this statement to a certain extent. I think that even thought Gorbachev did help to end communism, it was the countries themselves that 'pushed' Gorbachev that little harder to end communism. If countries did not rebel against him or his ways then Gorbachev wouldn't fell the need to do anything about it and therefore communism would still have gone on. If statues are placed in European capitals then it should be only in the capitals that wish to have a statue of Gorbachev in them, and if a capital does not want one then no offence should be taken. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. American History.

    - Sensing another compromise was necessary, Henry Clay [veteran of the 1820 and 1833 deals] stepped back up and, with the help of Stephen A. Douglas, came up with the Compromise of 1850. Obviously, the big issue was when territories could prohibit slavery [North = ASAP, South = very late in process when slaves hopefully already there].

  2. Communism in the Soviet Union and why it Failed Communism is defined as

    In 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed. What was the problem with this system of government, if this is a workers paradise what happened? What did the Soviet Union do wrong to cause a breakdown of their ideal system? In this paper I will explore the rise of the Soviet power and causes of the 1991 breakup.

  1. Why did the Soviet Union maintain a presence in Eastern Europe? And why did ...

    Soviet intentions became clearer when the 'iron curtain' was realised at Yalta and at Potsdam. However, Stalin did not wish to move the Soviet Union into Europe, he wished to isolate Eastern Europe outside of Western influence and under the control of the Soviet powers based in Moscow.

  2. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    Was repeatedly sent to Siberia. Made Commissar for Nationalities in 1917. Supported Lenin closely. During the Civil War had several conflicts with Trotsky. In 1922 he was made General Secretary of the Party - a post no-one else wanted - it was regarded as 'boring'.

  1. The Soviet Union.

    After introducing NEP in 1921, the country was in worse condition than before. Lenin decided that the only way to solve this issue was to return to a system that allowed some private business but this change would have been for a short period of time until the country recovered from the wars.

  2. What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist ...

    Not all historians, however, agree with this. Anderson suggests that the 1917 revolution was not one against capitalism, but one against feudalism.7 If indeed this were the case, the Bolsheviks were in effect trying to create socialism before, according to Marx, it was theoretically possible to do so.

  1. How far did Kennan's ideas actually shape US policy towards the Soviet Union?

    (Kennan 581) The ultimate objectives of containment were to prevent the expansion of Soviet power. This was an essentially contested concept, however, since there was no firm agreement on the limits. In examining containment policy, one must investigate both Kennan's views on the breadth of containment, and his views on

  2. Journalism - Two generations of the journalists - Soviet and the post-Soviet - make ...

    they were interpreted, in our case we shall use the notion the western discourse in a general sense, not distinguishing the European and the American context. However some scholars because of these differences come to the conclusion that "the terms 'profession' and 'professionalization' are virtual nonconcepts, since there is a little consensus about their meaning" (Forsythe & Danisiewicz 1985, 59).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work