• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The success of the Nationalist cause in the Spanish Civil War was due primarily to the help it received from its foreign allies: For what reasons would you agree or disagree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The success of the Nationalist cause in the Spanish Civil War was due primarily to the help it received from its foreign allies: For what reasons would you agree or disagree with this statement? A snapshot of 1936-1939: Britain and France tiptoe around Italy's conquest of Abyssinia and their second conquest of the football World Cup. Stalin delivers a constitution, an illusion, distracting from his bloody purges. Austria and Czechoslovakia are devoured into The Third Reich. The Fair Labour Standards Act comes into play in the US fighting recession, and unemployment. The Popular Front of France makes sweeping social changes under the guidance of Leon Blum. In 1937, the 999-telephone number for emergency services is introduced in the UK. The Empire is falling apart, and Mahatma Ghandi leads a campaign of civil disobedience against British rule. The Irish Free State becomes Eire, Japan invades China. Spain has its own problems: disorganised parliamentary government a problem solved by military rule. Upon its becoming a problem, is saved by farmers, and in turn, by socialists. Yet confusion and deterioration reign and soon the actual landscape of Spain is covered with that which the weather cannot wash away. "No, painting is not made to decorate apartments. It's an offensive and defensive weapon against the enemy" -Pablo Picasso, 19451 In support of the reasoning that Foreign aid won the nationalists the war, using a chronology full ...read more.

Middle

to German aircraft and Italian infantry" -Puzzo6 Baldwin and Chamberlain's 1936 Non-Intervention committee was about as successful as the rest of their appeasement policy. 'While the rules of the NIC were observed by the democracies, they were openly flouted by the dictatorships'7 Choking the French aide meant that the Spanish Republics only course of action was to flee into the arms of Russia. Outside of the international brigades, the Soviet Union was the biggest supporter of Caballero and Negrin's defending armies. Paradoxically, their help was also a hindrance. Stalin's opening gestures in the war, and much of the way through, were in their own way a form of appeasement. He had hoped to keep out of Hitler's view for as long as possible. Lee suggests he had been trying to warn Britain and France of the danger the Fuhrer represented, pulling out when it became clear they were no longer interested. Whatever the actual truth, Stalin had not supplied the Republic with enough arms to do the job properly. On October 25th, a substantial part of the third largest gold reserve in the world was transferred to Russian hands. The army of Africa while fighting for Madrid, were still occupying Spanish-Morocco without problem, aided by the Moroccan government, who had matched Italy's number, sending out seventy-five thousand troops.8 Along another border, Dr. ...read more.

Conclusion

Divisions over the primary objective of the war can only have made easier the nationalist mission. The length of Franco's leadership of Spain, his keeping the Republic of World War II through to his good choice of successor are aspects of evidence of the Nationalist strength outside foreign allegiance. With a view to the statement and the scope of 1936-39 to which this essay refers, I cannot judge. Much of the corporate world acted as if their involvement was necessary, whilst seeing a Nationalist victory as something of a safe bet. I can neither agree nor disagree with the statement, these facets of fact, are inseparable. "To have stopped Franco's 'Army of Africa...and its well-trained Civil Guards and police auxiliaries, would have been nothing less than miraculous once it established a strong base on the Spanish mainland. That hastily formed, untrained and virtually unequipped militiamen and women slowed up Franco's army's advance on Madrid for four months and essentially stopped it on the outskirts of the capital is a feat for which they have rarely earned the proper tribute from writers on the civil war of the past half century"10 Indeed, for Bookchin has not mentioned that the first rising in Madrid failed on July 1936, and was continually thwarted until the Nationalists entered on March 28th, 1939. The capital Madrid was relentlessly defended time and time again over those three years, with and without foreign aid. Perhaps not such a safe bet after all. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    However, the USSR was never as committed to the conflict as Germany and Italy were and Stalin was only interested in supplying the right amount of armaments to keep the Republicans fighting. Furthermore, International Brigades supported the Republicans because they were against Nazism and Fascism and wanted to sustain democracy against the right wing threat.

  2. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    However, after October 1919 the Bolsheviks had turned the tide, picking off White armies one by one and thereafter pushing the Whites back until their final defeat at the end of 1920. A solid reason that lay behind these defeats was the lack of military strategies and co-operation as well

  1. The Spanish Civil War

    Franco also publicly kissed the Monarchist red and yellow flag at a rally in Seville in August 1936 at the Feast of the Assumption, thus appealing to the monarchists, it was at this speech that the movement first started to be portrayed as a 'holy crusade' rather than solely a political struggle.

  2. How far do you agree that Israeli victories in successive Arab-Israeli conflicts in the ...

    Also the vast majority of the Arab armies were very poorly trained, equipped and lead; the only exception of this was the British trained Arab legion in Jordan. The strength of the Israeli military was an important reason for their victories in successive Arab-Israeli conflicts.

  1. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    4 To execute prominent and clearly exposed counter-revolutionaries"14. This primary evidence conveys that the fact that they had to establish and use the Cheka to remove opposition shows that there was opposition internally in Russia rather than the more transparent opposition from the Whites, and more attention was set to them as this issue was addressed due to

  2. What were the causes and consequences of Italy's involvement in the Spanish Civil War?

    were not afraid to oppose their views as they were a strong country. Italy's fear of communism is innately involved in their reasoning of wanting to become involved in the SCW, Italy knew Russia would become involved in the war on the side of the republicans, Italy feared that if

  1. Was the civil warinevitable?

    very revolution which the south sought to avoid in the shape of the civil war. Lincoln had made it clear in his debates with Douglas that although he did not like slavery he would not tamper with it, however he had used the antislavery issue to his advantage in gaining support from abolitionists.

  2. How far do you agree that the development of the Cold War between 1945 ...

    Another factor that hasn?t been mentioned in the sources but, from my own knowledge, is important when looking at both sides of the argument, is that many people say Stalin was just reacting to American policies and wanting to improve his country because he felt threatened and intimidated by Truman.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work