• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The survival of the tsars regime in Russia between 1906 and 1914 was due to the weaknesses of its opponents. How far would you agree with this?

Extracts from this document...


The survival of the tsar?s regime in Russia between 1906 and 1914 was due to the weaknesses of its opponents. How far would you agree with this? On the advice of Stolypin, the Tsar grudgingly introduced some reforms in industry, agriculture and education. This strengthened his position because it appeased the masses, causing opposition parties to lose popularity and decreasing calls for revolution. He had previously introduced the October Manifesto, dividing the opposition and giving the illusion of reform, yet used the Fundamental Laws of 1906 to maintain his autocracy. The Fundamental Laws declared ?Supreme Autocratic Power? belonged to the tsar which simultaneously weakened the opposition and strengthened the tsarist regime. The tsar did allow the creation of a Duma but placed so many limitations upon it. The structure of the Duma was carefully considered, so as to weaken the power of the parties in it. It was bi-cameral with an elected lower house and a state council mostly appointed by the tsar. The 2nd chamber could veto so deprived the elected duma of any real power. ...read more.


This deprived the revolutionaries of mass peasant support thus cementing tsarist power. The creation of Kulaks, rich peasants, also weakened the opposition. The Land Bank was established to provide funds for the independent peasant to buy their land. This aimed to create a layer of prosperous peasants that would block forces of revolution. It partly succeeded. This social transformation drained the strength out of the revolutionary support, helping to maintain tsarism. Although the opposition was weak, Stolypin?s policy of repression also helped the tsarist regime survive. Martial law was proclaimed and military courts were used to quell disturbances. Between 1906 and 1911, there were over 2500 executions and the hangman?s noose became known as ?Stolypin?s necktie.? This illustrates how the tsar was firmly in control and that it was not just the weaknesses of his opponents that meant the tsarist regime survived for so long. The survival of the tsar?s regime was also helped by the partial economic recovery caused by the end of the war with Japan and the Tsar?s reforms. ...read more.


Yet neither was appreciated by the tsar despite the fact that, without them, tsarism would have been more likely to fail. The weakness of the opposition wasn?t the only factor that enabled the tsar to secure power. Initially, the outbreak of WW1 in 1914 actually benefitted the tsarist regime. Firstly, the Duma showed its support for the tsar by calling for its own suspension during the war, illustrating how the Duma was like putty in the tsar?s hands. Another reason being, that the Bolsheviks were vilified as traitors for being anti-war so many, Lenin included, were forced to leave the country. Thus weakening their influence within Russia and allowing the tsarist regime to survive. The key to the tsar?s survival was his clever use of tactics. In the heat of the crisis he granted political and economic concessions in order to appease opponents. Then once he had regained control he began to suppress the opposition once more. This is primarily seen by the publication of the Fundamental Laws of 1906 and the use of the Okhrana. Lulling the opposing parties into a false sense of security weakened them. This helped the tsarist regime survive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    If the Tsar had kept control of the army, he could have dealt with the revolution, however, if Russia had been better ruled, there may not have been a revolution in the first place. All of the effects of the First World War worked together to result in the collapse of the Tsarist regime.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Stalin had not taken notice of warnings that Germany was about to attack. The Red Army had been crippled by the Purges. * To win the war, Stalin ordered the countryside to be destroyed as the Red Army retreated, he also appealed to Soviet citizens to defend their motherland.

  1. How stable was the tsarist regime in Russia on the eve of the First ...

    However, the revolts of national minorities were in the borderland areas and were too localized in nature. Nonetheless, the situation was particularly dangerous as peasants, industrial workers, and the intelligentsias were pro-reform. A few years before 1912, opposition from the Marxist-oriented revolutionary parties were weakened because their many leaders were in exile and they were short of money.

  2. How Successful Were The Agrarian Reforms of Stolypin 1906 - 1914?

    another revolution, Nicholas II believed that the farmers would support him as they wouldn?t want their status to change or for their wealth to decrease. One of success within this reform was that the Kulaks consolidated their land which meant land was more likely to be awarded to them as they were seen to be more likely to succeed.

  1. Why did the 1905 revolution fail to overthrow the Tsarist regime?

    variety of views thus all had conflicting ideas, as their party was 50% peasantry it can be said they played a role. However, nothing was directly accredited to the party. In fact the only concrete element of the revolution the political parties were involved in was the forming of the

  2. How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist ...

    Both splits however used political channels and also street protests and demonstrations to get their views across. These divisions meant that each opposition group?s strength alone was not enough to achieve their own specific goals and even though the groups did have some tactics such as propaganda in common, it was not enough.

  1. How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning ...

    This could be because Khrushchev promoted peace which may have been viewed by the Russians as weakness. This is certainly the view of his son, Sergei, who ?believes that Americans have a better attitude toward his father than Russians?[15] because ?he is more understandable to them?15.

  2. How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of the Tsarist ...

    The finance minister Nicolai Bunge introduced the Peasant?s Land Bank in 1883. This offered affordable loans to peasants for the purchase of land and agricultural equipment. He also abolished the poll tax for all peasants and offered cash incentives for them to move to Siberia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work