• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Thirty Years War was a war over religion rather than politics. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Thirty Years War was a war over religion rather than politics. Do you agree? 'During the whole of the seventeenth century there were only six years in which there was no war in some area of Europe; in the first half of the century there was no year of peace at all'1. During these fifty years Europe was embroiled in a period of conflict known as the Thirty Years War. The main conflicts of this period were; the war in Germany (1618-1648), conflict between Spain and the Dutch Republic (1621-48) and war between France and Spain (1635-59). Though only four European nations are mentioned here these conflicts eventually spread and overlapped to involve every European nation to some extent. Viewed at face value the alliance division of the war into Catholic and Protestant nations lends itself to the interpretation that this was a war fought over religion. However it could be argued that though religious factors were prominent political factors too were highly important. Moreover religious and political issues can often overlap and combine to create a more complex picture. The aim of this essay will be to analyze the circumstances surrounding the three principle struggles referred to above and, using historians' interpretations, arrive at a conclusion as to whether or not these wars were fought over religion rather than politics. ...read more.

Middle

The progressive escalation of potential disasters appeared to be a dominant factor in the decision to attack a neighbor for the sake of defense. This occurred in Sweden for example where Gustavus Adolphus persuaded his government that Ferdinand II's success over the Protestant rebels and their allies presented a major threat to Swedish security. However, after winning important victories this justification for war was further modified as political ambitions took hold of Adolphus. In a sense 'defense had been transformed into a new imperialism'11. Though Adolphus' death put a damper on his more radical plans Sweden continued to fight for economic and political control of the great Baltic river estuaries. Furthermore, Koenigsberger argued that although the Protestant-Catholic antagonism remained the basic determinant, it was not the over-riding one12. As fighting progressed armies were recruited almost indifferently from Catholics and Protestants. Their generals often had private ambitions and fell foul of their employers, so much so that regiments and even whole armies would change sides13. What this shows is that as the conflict in Germany continued religious persecution was no longer the main cause of bloodshed. Instead, as time progressed, political factors such as territorial expansion, national security and personal aggrandizement became increasingly apparent. ...read more.

Conclusion

From the evidence presented in this essay it is apparent that the conflicts of the period were fought over a multitude of issues which varied depending on the particular nation in question. Yet due to the nature of the conflict between Catholics and Protestants religious factors were ever present in the motivations of Europe's leaders. It can be said that the period certainly began as a primarily religious conflict as a Catholic monarch attempted to halt Protestant rebels. The argument that this element of the conflict was fought over religion is cemented by the fact that at the post-war settlement the German princes were confirmed in the right to determine the religion of their subjects26. Though as the conflict in Europe widened it can be said that war was pursued for more economic and political reasons including personal aggrandizement and imperial expansion. Yet into these political factors were woven strands of religious fervor and conflict and vice versa. This ultimately highlights the complexity of the situation because as secular governments did not begin to develop until after 1648 religion and politics were always influencing each other. Due to this it is possible to conclude that the nature of the Thirty Years War cannot be attributed to solely Religion or Politics rather a symbiotic combination of the two. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Moon Landing: Conspiracy or Reality?

    No independent press conference was permitted about the Apollo 11 expedition. But unfortunately for hoax believers, there is an explanation for every point made by the skeptics. Some of these explanations involve understanding photographic techniques, and some have to do with properties of the moon itself.

  2. The Spanish Civil War

    The different groups were much more internally divided than the Nationalists and there was a low degree of unity among them. Nationalist society was based on the military and this gave their armies a lot more strength, as well as having most of the officers and experienced soldiers such as the Army of Africa.

  1. Timothy W., Luke 'Museum politics: Power plays at the exhibition'

    Luke sees the Enola Gay episode, not as a case of political censorship, but as symptomatic of a far larger and more volatile American ideological battle, which became crystallized in the context of an institutional structure: the museum. Luke also explores museums as memorial spaces, such as the Museum of

  2. The role of partisan politics in the spread of McCarthyism

    10 McCarthy made one sensational, unsubstantiated allegation after another: Dr. Owen Lattimore, a respected scholar at Johns Hopkins University, was labeled the 'head of an espionage ring in the State Department', 11 noted Hollywood entertainment industry personalities were accused of Communist Party connections, and throughout the campaign to elect Dwight D.

  1. History of the United States

    On Dec. 7, 1941, the Japanese reacted to stiffening American diplomacy against its expansion into Southeast Asia by attacking the U.S. fleet at PEARL HARBOR in the Hawaiian Islands. This thrust was aimed at immobilizing American power long enough to allow the establishment of a wide imperial Japanese perimeter including

  2. What was at issue in the Thirty Years War?

    They deposed the Habsburgs and crowned Frederick V of the Palatinate as their King. Initially, the revolt seemed destined for success. However, Ferdinand II struck back, subsidised by his Spanish relatives and in alliance with the Catholic League and with Lutheran Saxony.

  1. Russia: a Century of Upheaval.

    Quite a few workers were interested, and they came together to form the Social Democratic Party. The party believed in the ideals of Marx (Marxism), which meant that they were willing to go to any lengths to achieve their aims. They plotted terrorist attacks; they staged daring robberies (for funding)

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    marked a sharp increase in the state actors compared to the end of World War II.National emancipation which started in the 1950s saw a lot of former colonies getting independence and this brought an increase in the number of actors in the international system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work