• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The underlying causes of the 1905 Revolution in Russia were not political. Whatever else the revolutionaries wanted, it was not the overthrow of the Tsar. How far do you agree with this claim?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

6. ?The underlying causes of the 1905 Revolution in Russia were not political. Whatever else the revolutionaries wanted, it was not the overthrow of the Tsar.? How far do you agree with this claim? ? Winter 2008 The key issue in this question is the underlying causes of the 1905 revolution and to what extent they were political. The Bloody Sunday might sound like a conspiracy among revolutionaries to overthrow the Tsar, but further examination of the event will reveal the underlying causes of the 1905 revolution. Even Father Gapon, head of the Assembly of Russian Factory and Mill Workers, the man who had led the demonstration only represented the workers demanding for the socioeconomic reforms. They were not political demands. The crowds carried the Tsar and the Tsarina icons depicted that they had no intention to overthrow the Tsar. However, without any doubt, the disappointment and frustration among the Russian population had resulted in the revolution. First of all, the main cause of the revolution was the poor socioeconomic condition in Russia. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the defective foreign policies had lessened the support for the Tsardom. In order to gain support and lessen opposition at home, Nicholas II sought after victories in war. The Russo-Japanese war was the biggest chance to rally the nationalism among Russian population. Nonetheless, due to miscalculation, Russia suffered humiliating defeat. Forces were too ill equipped and poorly trained. The Baltic fleet and the Potemkin mutiny revealed the incompetence of the armies, the navy and the Tsar himself as the ruler. Although military reforms had been undertaken after the loss in Crimean War, the incompetency of the Tsar had resulted in failure to bring significant changes in the military forces. This encouraged Russian to discredit autocracy. Without any doubt, loss in the war and the Baltic fleet had resulted in the spread of dissatisfaction among middle class and armies. Although these facts proved the weaknesses of the Tsar as a ruler, he had never lost the support from the armies during the 1905 revolution. In fact, the revolutionaries were suppressed by the troops themselves and the revolution ended. Additionally, the revolution was the result of the defect of the Tsardom. ...read more.

Conclusion

On one hand, the group of Liberals including the populists and the Menshevik had no intention to overthrow the Tsar. They only wanted the establishment of constitutional monarchy. On the other hand, the radicals consisting of Nihilists, Marxist, Social Revolutionary Party and the Bolshevik wanted the revolution. They believe in the efficacy of political terror and spectacular political assassinations; their victims including two ministers and one prime minister. Political opposition to autocracy was not, however, the monopoly of the extreme left. Majority of the population ? the peasants and the workers ? did not even care about the political concerns. What is more, the demonstrators were led by a priest, who believed in the principle of orthodoxy, supporter of the autocracy; he would never have the intention or thought of overthrowing the Tsar. It was merely a demonstration demanding for reforms. Without any doubt, the October Manifesto did prove the existence of the political pressures on the Tsardom, yet the socioeconomic issues were the major reasons that drove people to revolt against the government. Therefore, I largely believe that the underlying causes of the 1905 revolution were not political. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    Although it brought, democratic ideals France didn't become a democracy. The Revolution was generated by a vast complex of causes, most important of which was the inability of the ruling classes of nobility, clergy and bourgeoisie to come to grips with the problems of state, the unstable nature of the

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Trotsky became the villain and Stalin himself the hero of the Revolution and the Civil War. * The Cult of Personality created a plethora of streets, buildings and even cities and towns being renamed in the honour of the 'wisest man of the twentieth century'.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    the number of local organizations, that membership continued to increase between August and October. Bolshevik representation in the Soviets, soldiers' councils and factory committees also rose, so that by the end of summer the Bolsheviks held a plurality of the seats in soviets located in several key regions of the country.

  2. Russian Revolution 1905 - Were the Underlying Causes Political?

    Such social conditions (and the social discontent which followed) were intensified even further by Witte's policy of industrialisation. Witte's policies, although having relatively minor economic benefits in attempting to accelerate Russian industrialisation of, had the more notable effect of raising taxes for sugar duties by 100% and by 1900 over

  1. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    However, Witte's programme led to significant long term growth (of around 8%), which lasted up to the start of the war. Moreover, later agricultural development built on his railway network, as well as on his policy of a peasant land bank, and newly available workforce meant that industry was better able to meet problems by diversifying products.

  2. Russian failure during the Russo-Japanese war was the principal catalyst for Revolution in Russia ...

    This could have suggested to Russians who were not opposed to Tsarist rule prior to the war that their country was not being run effectively and hence effectively encouraged revolution in contrast to ?averting it.? In addition, resources which were diverted to the war lessened the already limited supply of

  1. How far do you agree that the Russo Japanese war was the biggest cause ...

    One of the most significant causes of the Russian revolution was Nicholas II. As proven by the quote it was clear that Nicholas was reluctant to become Tsar. He was not a strong character and was ignorant of the nature and extent of the opposition.

  2. Alexander III bequeathed Russia a revolution. How far do you agree with this statement?

    This was a series of laws passed with the intention of bringing cohesion to all the different people groups, thereby eradicating signs of non-Russian nationality. Alexander III wanted to rid Russia of western ideas that he believed had weakened the nation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work