• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The USA's reasons for their involvement in Vietnam - source related study.

Extracts from this document...


From my own knowledge, I know that the USA's reason for their involvement in Vietnam was to prevent the spread of communism. This was referred to as the domino effect. If one country fell to communism, then the other countries would fall. America wanted to contain communism behind the iron curtain across Asia and part of Europe. Source A is a speech by the president at the time, Johnson. He says their involvement is to give South Vietnam independence and freedom for the people. The source was written one month after the start of military action, the author is the president at the time. This is useful because it gives the official view of the war, it is what Johnson told people was his reason to start war. The date of the source is April 1965; war has started. It is useful because the source is produced at the time; the audience is the people from America and other nations, to justify the war. ...read more.


The author will be working with the president, but it is unknown how he recorded this conversation. The source was produced in May 1964, shortly before military action began in Vietnam. Johnson believes they will loose. The audience for this source would be advisors of the president. The story may have been leaked to the press to show the president has little confidence in the war. The purpose of the source is to tell people where the president really stood on the war. The source is useful because it shows that the only reason president Johnson is taking military action in Vietnam, because he fears he will loose his job. He personally doesn't want to be involved, but politicians are in favor of going in. If he doesn't listen to what the politicians say, he may seem unpopular and loose his job. ...read more.


This gives the American critic plenty of time to research why he felt the war failed. The author is a well-known critic, and will research his opinion. The audience would be people interested in the war. The source is useful because it gives a well-researched opinion. His opinion is trusted and he is knowledgeable in the matter. The source is also useful because it is balanced and the source has a clear objective. The most useful source is source C. The source has plenty of facts for the start of the war. Noam has produced a balanced opinion with a clear objective. The other sources are useful. Source A gives us the official view on the war. Source B is useful because it gives Johnson's real opinion on the war. Though source C is the most useful for giving an informative view on the war. Despite the fact Noam Chomsky was a self confessed critic of the war. He would have only come to the conclusion after extensive research. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Vietnam War - source related questions and answers

    If it were being said privately then it would mean less than it would if it were said in front of an audience or indeed on television. Source four tells us the viewpoint of the "doves" and the "hawks". The doves being the anti-war members of the Democratic Party and the hawks being the pro-war members.

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    By personifying communism into the role of the 'robber' shows that America thinks that communism is bad and wrong. This gives us another insight into why America became involved in Vietnam, because they thought that by not getting involved they would somehow be showing weakness to communism.

  1. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    Agent Orange killed and maimed the Vietnamese landscape in the same degree napalm maimed and killed people. Unlike napalm however, the lasting effects of Agent Orange can still be seen today, and its witched roles with napalm beginning to destroy and maim people's lives The chemical weapons proved reasonably ineffective

  2. The Home Front - source related study

    The source also states that the women were only paid a wage of 15 shillings a week which is only around �3 a month. This is certainly not much and would not have better fed, clothed and housed their children as stated in Source C.

  1. Hitler - Source related study.

    It was just an excuse to get more of the German people to approve of the war with Britain and France. In my opinion. In Source E you see Hitler as a leader and idle almost, a hero. Holding up the flag must be a great honour and with his fist, showing determination.

  2. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    However, it wasn't until victory looked certain, that the parties gave any serious thought to the shape of the post war world. In October 1944 the British Prime Minister held a meeting with Stalin in Moscow during the course of which, the post war shape of the Balkans and the

  1. The Arab Israeli Conflict - source related study.

    and provenance and the fact we know that there were other dimensions not mentioned make it impossible to say that other countries caused the war. 4. Source E claims that the Israeli�s are to blame for causing the war due to their constant acts of aggression towards Syria and its Arab people under the urging and backing of USA.

  2. US involvement in South Vietnam - source related study

    Source C also supports source A as it points to the fact that made to believe that involvement in Vietnam was necessary. It gives a "cops and robbers" good guy-bad guy analogy of the war. However, Source C disagrees with source A because it tells is about what happened to the men when they got out to Vietnam.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work