• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The USA's reasons for their involvement in Vietnam - source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

From my own knowledge, I know that the USA's reason for their involvement in Vietnam was to prevent the spread of communism. This was referred to as the domino effect. If one country fell to communism, then the other countries would fall. America wanted to contain communism behind the iron curtain across Asia and part of Europe. Source A is a speech by the president at the time, Johnson. He says their involvement is to give South Vietnam independence and freedom for the people. The source was written one month after the start of military action, the author is the president at the time. This is useful because it gives the official view of the war, it is what Johnson told people was his reason to start war. The date of the source is April 1965; war has started. It is useful because the source is produced at the time; the audience is the people from America and other nations, to justify the war. ...read more.

Middle

The author will be working with the president, but it is unknown how he recorded this conversation. The source was produced in May 1964, shortly before military action began in Vietnam. Johnson believes they will loose. The audience for this source would be advisors of the president. The story may have been leaked to the press to show the president has little confidence in the war. The purpose of the source is to tell people where the president really stood on the war. The source is useful because it shows that the only reason president Johnson is taking military action in Vietnam, because he fears he will loose his job. He personally doesn't want to be involved, but politicians are in favor of going in. If he doesn't listen to what the politicians say, he may seem unpopular and loose his job. ...read more.

Conclusion

This gives the American critic plenty of time to research why he felt the war failed. The author is a well-known critic, and will research his opinion. The audience would be people interested in the war. The source is useful because it gives a well-researched opinion. His opinion is trusted and he is knowledgeable in the matter. The source is also useful because it is balanced and the source has a clear objective. The most useful source is source C. The source has plenty of facts for the start of the war. Noam has produced a balanced opinion with a clear objective. The other sources are useful. Source A gives us the official view on the war. Source B is useful because it gives Johnson's real opinion on the war. Though source C is the most useful for giving an informative view on the war. Despite the fact Noam Chomsky was a self confessed critic of the war. He would have only come to the conclusion after extensive research. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Vietnam War - source related questions and answers

    If it were being said privately then it would mean less than it would if it were said in front of an audience or indeed on television. Source four tells us the viewpoint of the "doves" and the "hawks". The doves being the anti-war members of the Democratic Party and the hawks being the pro-war members.

  2. To what extent was involvement of USA in Korean War Different from its involvement ...

    While in Vietnam neither China nor Russia supported the army as directly as in Vietnam, in Korea China was directly involved since the problem was slighted related with the relationship between USA and Chiang Kai-Shek troops.

  1. The Home Front - source related study

    Whereas Source B inferred that the working conditions for women were awful, wages low and that women were most definitely not happy in their new jobs. 3. Source D is a photograph taken in a munition factory during the First World War.

  2. The Home Front 1914-1918, Women and work - source related study.

    With the pioneering of dilution (when lower class women recruited to do skilled jobs) men thought that this technique to bring in more women workers was undermining and lowering the status of their jobs as these woman were adapting even though they didn't not have the same training as the men.

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    As the end of National Socialism and Japanese militarism became inevitable during the course of 1944, the war aims of the victors became settled in the minds of the probable victors. It soon became apparent that both the USSR and the USA had different end games in mind, which as

  2. US involvement in South Vietnam - source related study

    Source C also supports source A as it points to the fact that made to believe that involvement in Vietnam was necessary. It gives a "cops and robbers" good guy-bad guy analogy of the war. However, Source C disagrees with source A because it tells is about what happened to the men when they got out to Vietnam.

  1. American Involvement in Vietnam.

    He eventually ended up placing 2300 troops into Vietnam in 1964. In 1963 after Kennedy was assassinated, Lyndon Johnson the new president wanted to put on a full scale assault on the Viet Cong. In august 1964 In the Gulf of Tonkin, North Vietnamese patrol boats fired upon US ships.

  2. The Arab Israeli Conflict - source related study.

    in showing the Arab view because they are messages to the Arab people. The claim that Israel are the aggressors is therefore probably wrong because two more reliable views from the same side disprove it and also Source E has several limitations to it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work