• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Use Of Atomic Bombs Against Japan.

Extracts from this document...


The Use Of Atomic Bombs Against Japan The photograph in source A shows graphic evidence of how the dropping of the atomic bomb caused catastrophic damage on a part of Hiroshima. It gives evidence that the bomb caused large amounts of damage, and explains the high death toll. There are a few buildings in the picture just standing with everything else wiped out by the blast. It does however not show how radioactivity has affected the area; it just shows the physical devastation. The photo has visual impact that would be difficult to explain in words. We know Hiroshima was a built up area but the photograph depicts an area showing little sign of habitation. This picture has been taken perhaps from a tall building or a helicopter to show the extent of the damage over quite a large area. The buildings have been reduced to nothing more than fine rubble apart from a few buildings. If this source were a bird's eye view photograph then it could show the devastation the bomb caused more clearly. ...read more.


The speech was his justification for dropping the bomb to end the war quickly after Truman realised how tough and unwilling to give in the Japanese were. Source D is not reliable as evidence of events in 1945 because this source is propaganda for the Japanese people; which makes it not literally true. The Japanese were defiant; this source is proof of that. This article does have its use of boosting morale of the Japanese. Japan's Prime Minister had the support of kamikaze pilots. But the population of 100 million weren't all prepared to sacrifice their lives. This source could be reliable evidence put out by the American Prime Minister to show the determination of the Japanese to defeat the enemy, therefore his way of justifying the dropping the bomb. Source E is not reliable evidence of events of 1945. It is truth-full evidence of events in 1945 because it gives an explanation of what happened. There is however no physical written evidence by General Groves, which makes the source more likely to be unreliable. ...read more.


This article still seems to show the bitterness and raw emotion even 18 years after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Source H was written only two years after the bombing and the feeling is that of a last resort to prevent further loss of men by ending the war and also warning communist Russia of Americas superiority. America had faced early problems when trying to invade Japan, loosing many men and gaining very little ground. The newly appointed Truman was worried about loosing support at home because of these loses and wanted a quick and effective end to the war. The Americans were fearful of the tactics of the Japanese in War after their savage attack on Pearl Harbour and the attitude of the Japanese suicide pilots. The historian's judgement is often clouded by different facts from various sources as shown in these two articles and one's personal opinion tends to support the victor as in this case America. Because of America showing Russia their new weapon this led to the start of a new arms race and the beginning of the Cold War. History Coursework Thomas Sawkins 11B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How effectively had Japan modernized itself by 1914?

    4 star(s)

    Since the daimyo with their samurai still ruled the clans, political control over the country was incomplete. The Meiji government got most of its taxes from former Tokugawa lands only, making the economic system not very sufficient. Also, there was a large national army, since the new government depended mostly on the Choshu and Satsuma clans.

  2. was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

    March 1945, Incendiary bomb were dropped onto the Japanese city of Tokyo, where the lost 80,000 citizens. Overall, throughout the 3 years, the Japanese casualties were high of about 270,000 from bitter fighting, defending territories and incendiary bombs. America really did have other alternatives rather than to use the atomic bombs twice.

  1. Truman had several reasons for dropping the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    in China and a share in the occupation of Japan as the price of his participation. Both the USA and Britain were alarmed at the prospect of the Soviet expanding into Asia. In 1986, Roy Jenkins said, " The USA was impatient to end the war before the Russians could

  2. Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified?

    Persons unaccounted for may have been burned beyond recognition in the falling buildings. No sure count of even the pre raid populations existed. In this uncertain situation, estimates of casualties have generally ranged between 100,000 and 180,000 for Hiroshima, and between 50,000 and 100,000 for Nagasaki.

  1. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    solely on the most advantageous military actions but political issues as well. It is also possible that international relations with the Soviet Union influenced Truman's decision to employ the atomic bombs. As World War Two neared its close the Soviet Union, under Josef Stalin, had military forces in occupation of Eastern and Central Europe.

  2. For what reason did Japan bomb Pearl Harbour?

    the study title, as it shows that America was trying to play a 'cat and mouse' game with Japan. In the month of July of the year 1937, Japan had ceased the opportunity and moved its forces to Inner Mongolia, and Northern China.

  1. Why did President Truman Decide to Drop the Two Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima and ...

    "I expect the 100 million people of the glorious Empire to join themselves in a shield to protect the Emperor and the Imperial land from the invader." The response was terrific, in nation wide call, over 28,000,000 people joined the local militia regiments.

  2. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    of the letter may give a false impression overall of the authors views. In my opinion, the points supporting the fact that this is a useful source outweigh the argument against. The man probably did feel extremely guilty for the actions of his country, and his own, but saw the bomb as a violent means for peace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work