• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The various theatres of war and the final outcome.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The various theatres of war and the final outcome. Were any of these fronts as important as the Western Front in deciding the outcome of the war?" The Western Front was only part of a war that also caused suffering and destruction in Eastern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. There were some dramatic battles in the mountains between Italian and Austrian troops. There were some tremendous battles on the Eastern Front where Russians fought Germans and Austrians. In the Middle East, Turkish troops with German officers fought British Commonwealth and Empire troops, along with their Arab allies. The Allied force at Salonika in Greece did not fare very well. The whole scheme was problematic. Leadership was poor. The commander of the French troops, General Maurice Sarrail, had been transferred to run the Balkan Campaign. It was not until September 1918, under Sarrail's command, that the stalemate was broken. In the end, the Bulgarians were defeated in just two weeks. ...read more.

Middle

The campaign was seen as a failure and Churchill was humiliated. Gallipoli wasn't important to the outcome at all and all it did was cause embarrassment for Churchill. Fighting took place across a vast area of land on the Eastern Front. There were some trenches, but warfare did not get bogged down in the same way as on the Western Front. At the start of the war, Russia surprised everyone. It quickly mobilized two massive armies and invaded East Prussia in August 1914. The Germans had to take an extra 100,000 troops away from the Western Front to fight them. This helped to ruin the Schlieffen plan. The failure of the Schlieffen plan was important to the outcome of the war. Because if the Schlieffen plan had succeeded the Germans might have won the war. The Russian armies enjoyed some early successes but at the Battle of Tannenberg they suffered a shattering defeat by German forces. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Germans realized that if they were to win the war they would have to concentrate their efforts on the Western Front against the more economically strong France and Britain. Although the Eastern Front occupied over a million German troops, the bulk of the troops and material was sent to the Western Front to try and achieve victory there. The Germans did hold the advantage on the Western Front. After all they were occupiers of much of Belgium and Northern France. They had also generally managed to secure the higher ground being in a position to decide where to withdraw if necessary. Ultimate victory over Germany would have to come in the fighting on the Western Front. Although several attempts were made to open up other fronts against Germany's allies between 1915 and 1917 (e.g. using the Italian forces to attack the Austrians; attempting to land troops in Turkey in 1915 to open a route to assist the Russians; attacking Bulgaria through Greece all these proved to be mere ' side shows' compared to the fighting on the western front. Christopher Goode 10L 5/7/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    do not know whether these sources can be trusted or not; people might have been biased during these periods of time. In conclusion I believe that both sources are useful because Source D shows us a modern interpretation of Haig and E shows us an interpretation if generals such as Haig whilst the war was going on.

  2. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    * Suspend certain civil liberties; censorship; Limit population movement; cut social activities. Germany - blockading of Germany & diversion to military caused substantial food shortages * Jan 1915 - rationing; 1916 bread rationed; Coffee unobtainable, butter substituted * Sausages were filled with offal, vegetables or saw dust.

  1. Was the entry of the USA into the First World War in 1917 the ...

    Another point to make is that the Allies were more friendly towards each other, and that they were prepared to listen to their criticisms and to work together to overcome them. An example of this was when the British and French united under one leader so that they could work together.

  2. Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of the ...

    The combination of rationing and an increase in the production of domestic food meant that Britain, unlike Germany, was not seriously damaged by the naval action. The lack of food in Germany put a strain on the German people's support of the war so I think this was an important factor in the final outcome of the war.

  1. How important was the war at sea

    casualties lost was so high in the Western Front that the volunteers were all used up. Some important people left their jobs to fight at the war and so some people thought that it was unfair that some men were escaping from military duty.

  2. How important were all these fronts to the final outcome of the war.

    This meant that we probably were never under threat but things were about to change.

  1. How Important was the War at Sea to the Final Outcome of the war?

    This was a significant battle as it shows Germany could not break the blockade on her ports. After this battle Germans never so much as left their ports in case of damaging their dreadnoughts again. Germany declared unrestricted submarine warfare though, which worked very well, and led to the food shortage in Britain.

  2. Anzacs and the Gallipoli Campaign of 1915. How useful are the views of the ...

    moral it doesn't seem likely that such a carefree attitude that is portrayed in source A could have been generated in the Gallipoli campaign. Even if Australia or New Zealand did have such attitudes then the conditions of the campaign would have quickly crushed them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work