• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The victory of Sinn Fein in the 1918 general election was solely due to the mistakes of the IPP after 1914. discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The victory of Sinn Fein in the 1918 General Election was solely due to the mistakes of the IPP after 1914. How far would you agree with this statement? Pre 1916, Sinn Fein rather than a fully established political party was known more as an umbrella term to label the various types of extreme nationalists in Ireland. Therefore, their rise to prominence in the 1916-18 period marked, most notably, by their success in the December 1918 General Election was extremely quick considering their political anonymity pre 1916. Undoubtedly, the Irish electorates? growing disillusionment and frustration of the IPP was a very considerable factor when looking at the Election result. However, there are other reasons for the electoral shift between the two parties including the actions of the Liberal Government and more simply, the support for the core principles and policy of Sinn Fein themselves. Therefore, I agree with the above statement but only to an extent. A major reason for the shift of support from the IPP to Sinn Fein in the 1918 General Election was due to the IPP and the electorate?s dissatisfaction with them as a nationalist party. Without doubt, the IPP were weakened by the postponement of Home Rule following the outbreak of World War one in 1914. ...read more.

Middle

This idea is supported to a degree by Laffan who stated that up until the Roscommon North by election, although the government and IPP were disliked there was simply no viable alternative to the IPP. Nonetheless, its own appeal and efforts did succeed in boosting its support also. Undoubtedly, the ?connection? between Sinn Fein and the 1916 Rising boosted the party?s profile and indeed support. For example, Count Plunkett father of Joseph Plunkett in Roscommon North, Joe McGuinness in Longford South and newly-released Eamon De Valera in East Clare. The increase of Sinn Fein clubs and their membership increased dramatically: in April 1917 there were 166 Clubs with 11,000 members by October 1917 there were 1,200 clubs with approximately 250,000 members. These clubs gave Sinn Fein, amongst other things, a good organisational base in terms of support. Unlike their IPP counterparts, the potential for internal dissension was overcome when the party was united under the leadership of De Valera. Generally speaking, a party with a seemingly unified approach will perform better electorally. The issue of Home Rule very much weakened the IPP, however, Sinn Fein on the other hand were very much strengthened in their very strong and unified in their commitment to winning an Irish Republic through a policy of abstention from Westminster. ...read more.

Conclusion

Firstly, the mistakes of the IPP, in particular their lack of action over Home Rule, was a considerable factor in that the Irish people would shift their support electorally to a party who seemed committed to Home Rule/Republican ideas, unlike the wavering IPP. Secondly, the appeal of Sinn Fein was another factor; the party through the support of the Roman Catholic hierarchy and their rather triumphant by-election victories throughout 1916 and 1917 identified the party as both respectable and popular with the electorate. Furthermore, many people felt that the IPP had sold out on their promises of Home Rule and desired more radical action, which Sinn Fein claimed they would deliver- an Irish republic. Thirdly, the actions of the Liberal Government, through wrongly linking Sinn Fein and the Rising and their executions of the ringleaders and imprisonment of3,000 others. Moreover, their duplicity surrounding the Lloyd-George negotiations perhaps cost them a lot of respect and legitimacy with the Irish electorate and perhaps this disillusionment with the British Government was another factor why Sinn Fein?s abstentionist policy received such widespread support. Therefore, I conclude that the statement that Sinn Fein?s electoral victory in 1918 was solely down to the actions of the IPP is not absolute as it is clear that there are other reasons for this. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

The writer shows a really sound knowledge of the subject and supports the with an excellent range of information. However, the expression of a few sections could be improved and a couple of small sections lack the accuracy of the main essay. More crucially, the actions of the British government- the shootings after 1916, conscription, and the maintenance of martial law well after the Rising which made life difficult for ordinary Irish people- need more prominence. But this is still an effective and well-informed answer which could be made even stronger by being brave enough to argue with the question's argument a little more!

Marked by teacher Phil Drake 17/03/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29?

    4 star(s)

    So he introduced the Parliamentary Subsidy, his most successful invention in financial administration. This taxed you according to your wealth, as your wealth increased the more tax you paid. It was a success bringing in �300,000 for the Royal treasury.

  2. Asses the most important factors that led to David Lloyd George(TM)s downfall in 1922

    This was especially true of LG's "homes fit for heroes" scheme, despite 170,000 new houses being built by 1922 the project was deemed a massive disappointment. In 1917 the Ministry of Reconstruction to look into the matter of substandard housing and it was concluded in 1919 that there were 400,000 houses across the country unfit for habitation.

  1. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    The events that followed became known as the "Five Knights Case". Some seventy gentlemen were remanded in prison for refusing to pay the Loan. They tested the legality of it by issuing a habeas corpus. However, the Privy Council would not give the specific reason as to their imprisonment.

  2. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    George Abbot was one of these MP's. He was an evangelical Calvinist who showed hostility towards Puritans, however, he agreed with Puritan critics of James' regime, objecting to the presence of papists in the Privy Council.

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    Before the Reform Bill of 1832 Horsham was the centre of some violent riots. In November 1830 a mob of between 1,000 and 2,000 marched on Horsham, evidently well organised and determined to get their demands of a minimum 2s.

  2. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    Henry changed from the exchequer system to the chamber in his reign. He needed this to make his government more effective, as it possessed some distinct advantages from the older exchequer system. The main advantage seen by Henry was that it would allow him to lay his hands on ready

  1. It was the militant suffragette campaign, more then any other factor that led to ...

    They gained a new self-awareness and new and improved status I n society. The war helped women's struggle for the vote because they proved that they deserved the vote. Their efforts in support of the war effort therefore succeeded where the suffrage movements had failed.

  2. Why did The Labour Party win the General Election in 1945?

    It was chaired by William Beveridge, an economist, who identified five "Giant Evils" in society: squalor, ignorance, want, idleness and disease. The main change that was promised in this report was the Welfare State, which made sure there was a commitment to health, education, employment and social security in the United Kingdom.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work