• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This essay will be based around the Government of Henry VII and will view aspects of it. It will examine whether it was efficient, just, and whether or not it was popular with people, circulating around the idea of whether it was a success or not.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful was Henry VII's Government This essay will be based around the Government of Henry VII and will view aspects of it. It will examine whether it was efficient, just, and whether or not it was popular with people, circulating around the idea of whether it was a success or not. Henry came to power on 22nd August 1485, after defeating Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth. However this did not signify the end of the Wars of the Roses. Henry, originally born in Wales, Henry then fled to France, but came back to stake a claim in the throne. With the ideas that a financially secure King was also seen to be a strong one, money was an integral part of Henry's survival. Henry having come from Brittany had no idea of finances and the world of Kingship in England. He was also more preoccupied with securing his position upon the throne. Thus the finances suffered a due blow, the finances would have broken down altogether if the exchequer had not served it's purpose as guardian of the royal finances. With this the crown's income per year fell from �25 000 at the end of Richard III's reign to �11 700 in Henry's first year as ruler. ...read more.

Middle

Extraordinary revenue consisted of money which was received or given to the King only in special circumstances these included Parliamentary grants, for things such as wars, they also consisted of loans and benevolences and clerical taxes. During Henry's reign only seven Parliaments were called in most of these cases it was in order to submit a request for a parliamentary grant or to pass an Act of Attainder. In Henry's reign each call of Parliament only lasted for about a couple of weeks. Parliament was much the same as it is now, it was divided into two sections, the lords and the commons, however the commons had virtually no power and were onlookers in certain cases. The Parliament altogether was really used as an instrument to raise taxes for the King. Lords were made up of two sections the Lords Spiritual and Temporal. The Lords Spiritual being the clerics and the Temporal being the peers. Henry sustained local gentry as magistrates, handing out Justice within their localities. These people were part of what was known as the Justice of the Peace. The magistrates were appointed yearly and were only allowed to pass judgement on non-capital cases. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore Kildare was reinstated and the main power again lay with the Anglo-Irish Chieftains in Ireland. For the period that the government was in Henry's government proved to be very efficient increasing by far the amount of incoming revenue, this is proved as Henry died solvent. It is also proved to be in some circumstances too effective as Dudley and Empsom found out, with their lives, in honouring the King and make his finances seem more with fraud, his successor Henry VIII then executed them from an outcry from the Nobles. Henry did not make the mistake of granting too much power to any one noble, distributed power evenly and cautiously with great effectiveness, thus securing his power. His government and administration can also be seen as a success as he was able to hand his crown down to his son and heir Henry VIII. This had not been done for quite some time and shows that Henry VII had finally placed some kind of stableness in the country of England. Henry's basic aim's were to secure power, in which he did and achieve financial stability, which he also achieved. However I do no think that he intended of creating the start of a New monarchy in the respects of changing things for the future. He just changed things to benefit himself and his government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    By relying more on the council and allowing his most trusted advisors to govern for him, the king created a strong central administration system. By reducing the amount of nobles created during his reign, and removing much of their land through attainder's, Henry made his government around a small section of his advisors and supporters.

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    On the 22nd of August the battle commenced. Richard was on top of the hill facing the north with his cavalry. Polydore confirms his position," "(Richard) drew his whole host out of their tents, and arrayeth his vanward, stretching it forth a wonderful length, so full replenished both with footmen

  1. How dangerous were the threats to Henry VII's government?

    Lambert Simnel was employed to work in the Royal Kitchens and Richard Symonds was imprisoned for life. Lovell and Lincoln probably were killed on the battlefield, as they were never heard of again. By 1491, another pretender to the throne appeared, going by the name of Perkin Warbeck.

  2. How Secure was Henry VII?

    And when Warbeck was finally found he was executed. These were all drastic measures so obviously he was a big threat to Henry and many important people had given their support to Henry, showing how weak his power was. Henry saw Warbeck as a thorn in his side as he was trying to seize power for much of the 1490's.

  1. Assess the validity of the view that the Rump and Barebones parliaments had no ...

    This is a major reason why the Barebones is often associated with failure, since after the Restoration it became customary to dismiss the Assembly as if it had been composed simply of the incompetent. "Peltifoggers, Innkeepers, Stockingmongers and such a rabble as never had hope to be of a Grand Jury" (Exiled Royalist Court letter).

  2. By what means, and how successfully did Henry VII improve Royal Finances?

    There were many means in which he did this. One was the system of 'wardship', and 'relief'. These were concerned with the passing of land over to the son in a noble family. If the noble holding land died before his son had reached maturity, then the King claimed 'wardship'.

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    ever in danger of rivalling Edward the Confessor's achievement of canonization - but you can perhaps see how it was that even those qualities we tend to disapprove of today in our society could be valuable in providing good government for the country.

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    their character to be, and the more arrogantly they behaved, the greater the fascination they had for him. All his feelings of unworthiness, all his guilt about his inability to act and to rule his people as a good king should, were summed up in his submission to them."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work