• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'To save gallant Belgium' - To what extent was this reason why Britain went to war in August 1914?

Extracts from this document...


'To save gallant Belgium'. To what extent was this reason why Britain went to war in August 1914? Relations between Britain and the other European powers, namely Germany and France, had been tense and forever-changing in the lead up to the war in 1914. France, Britain's natural enemy, had become increasingly cooperative and relations greatly improved, enforced by the Entente Cordiale agreement. On the other hand, the Anglo-German naval race increased tension, which had previously been almost non-existent, between the powers. Britain's conflicting obligations` and reluctance to make an alliance made matters more awkward. Britain had been making more specific commitments to France in the run up to the war, and when Germany declared war on France it put these commitments with her to the test. The threat to Belgium's neutrality provided a way out of the corner which Britain had backed itself into, and gave politicians sufficient justification to sway the public over going to war with France to whom it had reluctantly committed albeit an 'informal' alliance but none-the-less a military agreement with. ...read more.


Canal to India, which was important for trade), while France wished to take advantage of the deteriorating situation in Morocco and wanted Britain to not interfere. It was signed in April 1904, much to the annoyance of Germany who felt left out of the negotiations over Morocco. Germany put the Entente to the test during the First Moroccon Crisis, where the Kaiser deliberately landed a gunboat in Tangiers, a Moroccon port and made a speech encouraging the independence of the Sultan of Moarocco. However, the Entente proved steadfast, and Britain stood by France. At this point France was keen on making a formal alliance with Britain although it was unlikely that the government and the British public wanted it at this moment. Instead, Grey (the Foreign Minsiter) authorised naval and military conversations with France but he failed to inform the cabinet. This was the beginning essentially, of a series of 'informal' promises made to France which were not approved by the cabinet or the public, and which led to the situation in 1914 where Britain were obligated to enter into a war with France but under the pretence of saving 'gallant Belgium'. ...read more.


France would not have made this decisive move if it had not been sure of British support in the event of a war with Germany. As Nickelson stated, at this point, 'The government had committed itself to a guarantee which would involve England either in a breach of faith or a war with Germany'. Grey was very aware of the difficulty of the situation, and believed that the British would not support going to war as they would not see it as in British interests. He also feared a split in the Cabinet, which could essentially mean the end of their term in government, which again he did not want. When Germany gave the ultimatum to Belgium in 1914, wanting a clear passage through to France, it saved the government, as they could claim there was no commitment to France but that 'gallant' Belgium and its future were at atske and Britain had to fight for her. Belgium was no more than an immediate escape from a commitment that the government could not feasibly uphold. It was used as a reason to feed the public, and Britain certainly did not enter the war entirely to 'save' gallant Belgium'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * This made it clear that Serbia was the most powerful of the Balkan states. But the Austrians were also well aware that any attack on Serbia would lead to war with Russia; a prospect that Austria could not face.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    To add to this pressure, the Soviet Union had three changes of leadership in four years: Brezhnev died in 1982, Andropov resigned through illness in 1983 and Chernenko was replaced with Gorbachev in 1985. What contribution did Gorbachev make to the end of the Cold War and the beginning of a new world order?

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Arafat's realm within Lebanon became known as the Fakhani Republic named after the district of Beirut where he had set up his headquarters, in large areas of Lebanon his authority was supreme. In a flagrant violation of Lebanese sovereignty the PLO set up road blocks, issued passes and travel documents,

  2. Why did Britain become involved in a European War in 1914?

    When German ships fired on Venezuelan ships, under the Monroe Doctrine, the U.S.A took it upon itself to intervene in defence of Venezuela. Germany refused to accept the Monroe Doctrine as a legitimate reason for American intervention and was prepared to pursue its campaign, however, Britain immediately backed down after

  1. 'No power wanted war, but all were willing to risk one.' Discuss this ...

    This attitude might be explained by the belief that unequivocal support from Germany in the 'blank check' would deter Russian intervention, or even Conrad's belief that Russia would not violate the principle of monarchical solidarity.2 However it is also true that some ministers were determined to strike Serbia regardless of

  2. How Stable Was the Tsarist Autocracy in 1914?

    Revisionists show that Lenin's genius wasn't needed, as peasants were capable of sustaining their own revolt. One Russian proverb goes thus: - "Give a starving man some bread, and he'll soon take the whole loaf." Expectations were high, and with every little bit of reform, the peasants insisted on more (bread).

  1. To what extent was independence a gift from Britain.

    This too however must also be seen to be draw from only a partial reading of events. As Griffiths points out, British control, though strained and tested, was not broken. Power was not seized, but granted by an act of the imperial parliament at Westminster.

  2. Multicultural Britain.

    The Bill of 1904 would eliminate as undesirable, 'persons of extremely bad character, or without perceptible means of support or likely to become a public charge. However the shipping companies who transported the immigrants also promoted the Government to gain their support and the liberals also strongly opposed this bill being passed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work