• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Degree was Reconstruction 1965-77 a false dawn for African-American Civil Rights?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what Degree was Reconstruction 1965-77 a false dawn for African-American civil Rights? After the end of the civil war, there were many issues which needed to be addressed. The civil rights of the African American's were in need of change, and during this period there were hopes that new legislation would be implemented to aid African Americans and other minority groups. This legislation would be called the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the 14th Amendment of 1868 (which promised equality), and finally the 15th Amendment (which gave the right to vote). However, despite the positive legislation, reconstruction aggravated a lot of people and brought the southern states into conflict with the Government. The Freedmen's Bureau was established in 1865, which aimed to provide food, clothing, and fuel to formal slaves and white refugees. The Freedmen's Bureau bill was also passed by Abraham Lincoln; however Johnson vetoed it, however a supplementary act extended its existence until 1870. ...read more.

Middle

Sharecropping still existed, and freedmen who had come out of slavery with no qualifications or experience became unemployed, so the living conditions for most freedmen did not improve. Slave-owners were also reluctant to let their slaves leave, and often kept them illegally. The 14th Amendment however was introduced in 1870, and this aimed to further secure the rights of the freedmen. This turned out to be one of the most important Amendments ever made to the American constitution. It threatened to reduce the representation of the states which continued to discriminate. However, a loophole in this law was that the states which continued to discriminate would just accept the unequal representation, but carry on with their discrimination, yet just not so obvious. Therefore by some, this could be seen as a false dawn, as it did address the issue of freedmen not having rights, but it also created a loophole for the southern states to take advantage of. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were a terrorist group which aimed to scare black people into not voting, and to basically cause terror because they were black. They at first were not an ultra-violent group, however as time progressed they quickly became increasingly violent, as lynchings were common, and they would often target the black people who were doing well for themselves, I.E lawyers who were doing a lot for civil rights, or those who went to vote. Because of this huge suppression and hatred, a lot of black people were scared to vote and in reality voting was not a freedom for black people. Some historians would say that reconstruction it itself did not really care for the black rights, and that it was a political move to try and remain Republican power in the south. Abraham Lincoln himself did not have a clear policy for freed slaves after the Civil War, so reconstruction was not seen as a solid plan from the start, it was looking like a false dawn. "False Dawn" - "something which seems to show that a successful period is beginning or that a situation is improving when it is not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    What the movement grew into however, can, in certain circumstances, can be deemed evil. Groups such as the New Black Panther Party65 and its de facto founder, Khalid Abdul Muhammad66, can be considered evil through their hate mongering tactics but this is only a small minority.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of federal ...

    4 star(s)

    Democrats, and so the acts were watered down to the point where they became almost meaningless. At this stage, Congress could still not be considered to have any real impact on civil rights for African Americans, primarily because of the aforementioned Congressmen.

  1. Discuss the influences on Malcolm X and how they helped form his ideology in ...

    He obviously differed from the Christian 'turn the other cheek' philosophy in response to brutality and he favoured self defence in these cases. But the fact was at this time the NOI played a back seat role and like spectators watched the events unfold.

  2. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    Sentence Structure Simple, short sentences are evident in some parts of speech. "We cannot walk alone." "We cannot turn back." The use of short sentences creates a sense of urgency and makes the phrases more memorable. The verb 'cannot' and the repetition in these sentences are reminiscent of Lincoln speech: "...We cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow..."

  1. Civil Rights Revision Cards 1945-68

    – then other students took up and retained the seats - forced café to close – spreads across South (involves 70,000 students) SCLC 1. Nb: SCLC had achieved little in 3 years since MBB. Initially King had nothing to do with sit-ins 2.

  2. Research on the major Civil rights events between 1963 to 1968

    Changed people?s ideas John F. Kennedy addressing the nation about Civil Rights on June 11, 1963 The Birmingham campaign, as well as George Wallace's refusal to admit black students to the University of Alabama, convinced President Kennedy to address the severe inequalities between black and white citizens in the South:

  1. Was Lincoln a genuine advocate for civil rights for African Americans?

    This illustrates how Lincoln believed that slaves should be free and they should have the right to eat with their own hands without ?asking leave of anybody else?. It becomes apparent that Lincoln did not believe that humans of any race should be owned, hence his viewpoint on slavery.

  2. The Debate over African American troops in the Civil War.

    Removing the slaves from their work fields would damage the southerner?s crop yield dramatically. Also some lived in fear that if taught the ways of war, the slaves would come back to pay their previous masters a visit. These were questions that Southerners did not know the answer to but didn?t want to find out by experiencing it firsthand.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work