• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extend did France help or hold back the unification of Italy from 1848-1870?

Extracts from this document...


To what extend did France help or hold back the unification of Italy from 1848-1870? Before 1870 Italy was separated into seven different states, each one having their own ruler. The process of unification included many national as well as international political leaders. France was one of the main reasons why unification was established in 1870, as she helped Italy to win independence from Austria. However the French involvement during that period was not to help Italy unify, but replace Austria with French supremacy. French involvement in Italy often hindered unification, and in few cases proved to be ineffective. Unification of Italy was the bypass product of the French participation in France, and could have been put off for even longer if France wasn't forced to remove her troops from Italy by another nation. France was a significant factor, which enabled Italy to unify by 1870. Austria was the main dominating power in Italy during the period, and the only option for Italy to become a united country was to eject Austria first. ...read more.


Napoleon helped to crush Italy's main obstacle to unification- Austria. Once Austria's occupation of Italy ended, the states could unify. Although this would not have been possible without Napoleon's help, as Italy was too weak to face Austria on her own, Napoleon's involvement in Italy had its own drawbacks in the unification. Due to France's participation and engagement in Italy, unification was sometimes procrastinated. In 1849 Napoleon was responsible for destroying the Roman Republic and restoring the Pope to rule Rome. Roman Republic was the foundation for a unified Italy, and because Napoleon dissolved it he prevented unification taking place earlier. Furthermore, he guaranteed protection to the Pope until 1870 by ordering the Neapolitan troops to remain in Rome, precluding it form joining the rest of the united Italy. At Plombiers the agreement between Cavour and Napoleon was to replace the Austrian supremacy with France. France was promised to be given Niece and Savoy which resulted in less states being unified. Napoleon was not dedicated to the agreement at Plombiers, which aimed to drive Austria out completely, and pulled out from the war with Austria in 1859 too early, which shows his contribution in unification was not dedicated as Italy was left to face Austria alone. ...read more.


Although these factors were a significant obstacle in the unification of Italy, France's involvement hindered it more. The national social and economic problems emerged as a result of a forced government and started to be solved in the future; demonstrating it only prevented it initially. France's involvement however, was continuous, since 1848 the French tried to evict Austria but at the same time keep Italy weak in order to ensure French dominance in Italy as well as Europe. In conclusion, France helped to make Italy independent, and therefore aiding unification, by evicting Austria from the country, which wouldn't have been possible otherwise. On the other hand, French involvement resulted in hindering the process of unification. French wanted to establish their own supremacy in the country, and although it appeared like they were interested in aiding the unification as they assisted Italy in few battles against Austria, the real cause was different. This is evident when France refused to remove her troops from Rome, central to Italian unification, until 1870 when France was threatened with a war with Prussia. France helped unification, but it was not intentional, and overall her actions resulted in delaying the process. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    When the Crimean war broke out in 1853 a perfect opportunity was granted. Victor Emmanuel offered the British, French and Turkish alliance a force of 18,000 men to assist the cause, this was accepted and in return Piedmont was given a seat at the negotiating table (The treaty of Paris).

  2. Why did Napoleon lose the Battle of Waterloo?

    the outcome of The Battle of Waterloo would have been very different. Ney is also responsible for the loss by spending the French cavalry in a series of unsupported, pointless attacks as well as leading the Guards in the wrong direction, diminishing the chance for success.

  1. Facist Italy by John Whittam - review

    Italy was economically, socially, and militaristically weak and divided. As a result, this paved the way for a strong leader with innovative vision to take Italy by the horns. Moreover, once Benito Mussolini came into power he was asked what is Fascism? He replied by saying "I AM FASCISM".

  2. "Cavour put himself first while Garibaldi put Italy first" - Discuss.

    By this Central Duchies were united, but Nice and Savoy were given to France. This damaged the territorial integrity of Italy. If he did not asked for France help and fought by themselves, they might have unified nice and Savoy also.

  1. Bismarck & Unification

    led to the dismissal of unpopular ministers and the calling of a national parliament to draft a constitution for a united Germany. While the constitution was debated at length, rulers of the German states were able to recover their authority.

  2. Why did the war against Austria in 1859 result in the unification of most ...

    Also it was decided that the previous rulers of the Central Duchies (Parma, Modena and Tuscany) would eventually return to rule, respectively. Conversely, Italian unification still had a long way to go, as Austria was allowed to keep Venetia and Cavour handed over Nice and Savoy to France, when he returned as prime minister in 1860.

  1. Explain Why The Austrian War Of 1859 Was Important In The Process Of Unification

    Because of this, and other reasons such as the protests of Roman Catholics, he ended the war. This could be regarded as an important step towards the Risorgimento as it was the catalyst for many other events that ultimately led to attempts at peace and further advances towards unifying the Italian states.

  2. Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866?

    Albrecht Von Roon, began reforming the army in order to make it stronger and more efficient, firstly he proposed to increase the annual conscription rate to 63000, he then proposed to create new infantry and cavalry regiments and to change the amount of service needed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work