• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extend did France help or hold back the unification of Italy from 1848-1870?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extend did France help or hold back the unification of Italy from 1848-1870? Before 1870 Italy was separated into seven different states, each one having their own ruler. The process of unification included many national as well as international political leaders. France was one of the main reasons why unification was established in 1870, as she helped Italy to win independence from Austria. However the French involvement during that period was not to help Italy unify, but replace Austria with French supremacy. French involvement in Italy often hindered unification, and in few cases proved to be ineffective. Unification of Italy was the bypass product of the French participation in France, and could have been put off for even longer if France wasn't forced to remove her troops from Italy by another nation. France was a significant factor, which enabled Italy to unify by 1870. Austria was the main dominating power in Italy during the period, and the only option for Italy to become a united country was to eject Austria first. ...read more.

Middle

Napoleon helped to crush Italy's main obstacle to unification- Austria. Once Austria's occupation of Italy ended, the states could unify. Although this would not have been possible without Napoleon's help, as Italy was too weak to face Austria on her own, Napoleon's involvement in Italy had its own drawbacks in the unification. Due to France's participation and engagement in Italy, unification was sometimes procrastinated. In 1849 Napoleon was responsible for destroying the Roman Republic and restoring the Pope to rule Rome. Roman Republic was the foundation for a unified Italy, and because Napoleon dissolved it he prevented unification taking place earlier. Furthermore, he guaranteed protection to the Pope until 1870 by ordering the Neapolitan troops to remain in Rome, precluding it form joining the rest of the united Italy. At Plombiers the agreement between Cavour and Napoleon was to replace the Austrian supremacy with France. France was promised to be given Niece and Savoy which resulted in less states being unified. Napoleon was not dedicated to the agreement at Plombiers, which aimed to drive Austria out completely, and pulled out from the war with Austria in 1859 too early, which shows his contribution in unification was not dedicated as Italy was left to face Austria alone. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although these factors were a significant obstacle in the unification of Italy, France's involvement hindered it more. The national social and economic problems emerged as a result of a forced government and started to be solved in the future; demonstrating it only prevented it initially. France's involvement however, was continuous, since 1848 the French tried to evict Austria but at the same time keep Italy weak in order to ensure French dominance in Italy as well as Europe. In conclusion, France helped to make Italy independent, and therefore aiding unification, by evicting Austria from the country, which wouldn't have been possible otherwise. On the other hand, French involvement resulted in hindering the process of unification. French wanted to establish their own supremacy in the country, and although it appeared like they were interested in aiding the unification as they assisted Italy in few battles against Austria, the real cause was different. This is evident when France refused to remove her troops from Rome, central to Italian unification, until 1870 when France was threatened with a war with Prussia. France helped unification, but it was not intentional, and overall her actions resulted in delaying the process. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Bismarck & Unification

    But liberal German nationalists feared the Junkers' control of the army. As a result, their representatives in the Prussian assembly overwhelmingly defeated new taxes to support a larger army. Frustrated by the defeat, the king appointed as his new prime minister a man who shared his views in army reconstruction.

  2. Why did the war against Austria in 1859 result in the unification of most ...

    Having being born in Nice, Garibaldi was angered and plotted to get it back into Italian hands. He began working on an armed expedition to recover Nice from France, he planned to blow up the ballot boxes which would determine the outcome of the votes for Nice to remain Italian or become French.

  1. Explain Why The Austrian War Of 1859 Was Important In The Process Of Unification

    Because of this, and other reasons such as the protests of Roman Catholics, he ended the war. This could be regarded as an important step towards the Risorgimento as it was the catalyst for many other events that ultimately led to attempts at peace and further advances towards unifying the Italian states.

  2. Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866?

    This made the new Prussian armed forces large, also with more regiments it was more mobile because it would be split into smaller more manageable segments and also made it constantly strong. These reforms were important because it brought Prussia a more modern outlook on war and with Railway and

  1. Facist Italy by John Whittam - review

    of Italy during the war were key in Mussolini's period of influence. Mussolini was able to counteract or create illusions to the problems that the society of Italy faced. Fascism had no unified ideology and it was not anti-semantic. Rather, Fascism was anti-capitalist, anti-Marxist, and anti-intellectual.

  2. GERMAN UNIFICATION

    This failed because once Napoleon was overthrown, the old monarchs were put back in place and any further attempts at unification were oppressed. The second attempt was made during the 1848 Revolution where the Frankfurt Assembly tried to install their Kleindeutsch plan in which the Assembly wanted to unify all German states, except Austria, under Prussia.

  1. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    Early on he met Mazzini and so became a republican fighting in the early revolutions for them. Garibaldi learnt to fight and this is what he did best. His impact in the unification process was one of "Doing" rather than "Thinking."

  2. "Cavour put himself first while Garibaldi put Italy first" - Discuss.

    Later in 1860, the Central Duchies refused the restoration of Austrian princes. Revolts broke out in Modena, Parma and Tuscany. They formed themselves into alliances and invited VE II as king. Cavour returned to office in Jan 1860 and took this chance to carry out a plebiscite.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work