• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extend did the battles of Gettysburg and Vicksburg (1863) mark the turning point of the Civil war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extend did the battles of Gettysburg and Vicksburg (1863) mark the turning point of the Civil war? It is said that the battle of Gettysburg combined with the fall of Vicksburg marked the turning point of the civil war. Both the battles of Gettysburg and Vicksburg certainly helped the turning point of the civil war. Gettysburg was a very important battle and many of the soldiers' including the commander, Lee realised this. Lee decided that he was strong enough to invade the north 0once more. He felt that if he invaded the north again it would bring a quick end to the war as if it was prolonged it would favour the North and he did not want this. In the battle of Gettysburg, Lee lost over 30,000 men and also lost many weapons and military materials, the army could never again invade the North as they would simply be too weak. ...read more.

Middle

This caused Lee to loose confidence in himself and his team. He tried to resign and this would not have been a safe option for The confederate as they would have no commander. All these points were turning points in the civil war as the Union were beginning to win a majority. The south had had a major blow at the battle of Gettysburg. Another turning point in the civil war was the battle of Vicksburg. In 1862 the confederate had control over the town of Vicksburg which prevented the union from controlling Mississippi. Vicksburg was vital to allow the confederate to gain full control of the south. The Union would be able to have free navigation from North to the South of the Mississippi. The Mississippi river was seen as "nailing the two halves together". The Mississippi river made it very difficult for Grant to capture. Grant had to ferry his army across the Mississippi. ...read more.

Conclusion

Because the river was seen as nailing the two halves together by the union gaining control of the south full control would be made and the south would be seen as a whole. Overall we can see that the battles of Vicksburg and Gettysburg were the turning point to the civil war to a certain extent. It was the battles of Vicksburg and Gettysburg that were very important events and ensured many union victories but also battles such as Antitam which help to make the turning point of the civil war. The battles of Gettysburg played a very important rule in t he civil war as it allowed Grant to become a national hero and the problems of the Mississippi river to be sorted out. It also showed the south that they did not have the "Knockout blow" to get the north to compromise peace. Many can see that these battles were very important turning point in the civil war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What role did the Battle of Gettysburg play in the victory of the North ...

    This superiority held by the North in resources, existed from the beginnings of 'the irrepressible conflict'3. Lee led an army at peak strength of 76,0004 men during the campaign, but was outnumbered by some 14,000 men. The three days of conflict saw 165,000 participants from both sides, with more than 51,000 casualties inflicted along the plains of Gettysburg.

  2. Was the civil warinevitable?

    very revolution which the south sought to avoid in the shape of the civil war. Lincoln had made it clear in his debates with Douglas that although he did not like slavery he would not tamper with it, however he had used the antislavery issue to his advantage in gaining support from abolitionists.

  1. Select and explain the most important turning points in Senator Joe McCarthy's political career

    At that time, Kennedy had lots of enemies. Kennedy's brother, Robert, was the Attorney General, and was starting a big campaign to expose the mafia. Right wing racists also had motives: Kennedy was in favour of focusing on the issue of black civil rights in America. Even the C.I.A had motives, because Kennedy had decided against invading Cuba,

  2. Explain the importance of the Battle of Britain as a turning point in the ...

    its invasion plan that may have been the cause to its failure. Britain had a factor that both helped and made them very venerable. The fact that it was an island meant that the Germans had to cross a large distance of water before they reached British shores.

  1. American Civil War (1861-1865).

    In July, General Irvin McDowell was replaced. Suddenly aware of the threat of a protracted war and the army's need for organization and training, President Lincoln replaced McDowell with General George B. McClellan. The war wore on. September, October, November and December went by with more battles happening every day.

  2. One More River

    "We are going to emigrate", the words drops into Lesley's mind innocently ...and explodes like a bomb. Emigrating means leaving home forever. She couldn't believe it. But her father has made up his mind.

  1. Custer - Hero or villain?

    The army needs people like me"). His personality meant he was prone to disobey orders. He was a good public speaker and didn't hesitate to point the finger at other people, even those higher than himself. For example, when having to answer about his actions in the Indian War, and their consequences, he blamed the Secretary

  2. “Generals Win Battles, Resources Win Wars”. How Far Does Your Study of the Period ...

    The increasing need for a general to understand how resources could now more than ever affect the course of war would lead to the advent of the philosophy that whilst generals were responsible for individual victories, it was the availability and masterful usage of resources that would win a war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work