• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

Extracts from this document...


A2 Nazi Coursework To what extent was Hitler 'a weak dictator?' There is a significant historical debate over the strength of Adolf Hitler's leadership and his position as a dictator, but it is fair to say that despite some clear weaknesses in his leadership style he was in fact a strong, rather than a weak, dictator. In order to understand why this is the case it is necessary to analyse Hitler's personality, decision-making and leadership style, and there are two main arguments that have developed when considering these issues. The "Intentionalists", such as Mason and Broszat, argue that Hitler's leadership showed he was a strong dictator as he was an astute politician, creating confusion among his followers to protect his position as leader. The 'structuralists', such as Shirer and Noakes, argue instead that Hitler's approach demonstrated weakness as he struggled to make decisions, failed to rationally organise his party and allowed his subordinates to undermine his authority. Overall, it is clear that despite his weaknesses, Hitler was a formidable politician who was able to maintain control of his government and cannot therefore be considered a weak dictator. Paragraph 1: Hitler's Personality Joachim Fest (1963) ...read more.


Ian Kershaw also explains that Hitler had many "Peripheral decisions"9 meaning that Hitler did not focus on main decisions that were needed to be made, instead he focused on little issues. This emphases the argument that Hitler was very much aware of the problems within his regime, however chose to look at less important matters rather than take full responsibility for every single decision, which one might find to be odd in a dictatorship government. Paragraph 3 Hitler's Leadership style William L. Shirer, "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, 1959, and G. Noakes and D. Pridham, "Nazism 1984, all emphasise that Hitler's leadership style did effect the regime greatly. For example, Shirer says that "Hitler was bored by the details of day-to-day governing and after he had consolidated his position following the death of Hindenburg he left them largely to his aides"10 This refers to the Fuhrerprinzip doctorine established in from the 1920's. Hitler chose not to exercise his powers after the Enabling Act of 1933 allowed him to act as ruler by decree. For example, Hitler enabled Goering to access any necessary powers to get Germany ready for war. ...read more.


However, being able to bring back Germany from the debts of depressions after World War 1 and gathering millions of supporters shows Hitler that he was more of a strong dictator rather than a weak one. His personality was also interesting. In his private life, he seemed to be like any other man. However, it was said that he became very lazy at points and infuriated at others. It was this personality which affected his decision making skills as well. Also, that being said, that only happened if he actually attended meetings or took responsibility with his power, instead he shifted powers, which caused a lot of confusion in the Third Reich. He was truly interested in natural selection and wanted competition in his government. It was 'Survival of the fittest'. It would allow Hitler to shift his power and relax whilst his subordinates worked hard and gained skilled which Hitler could use to benefit the Nazi regime. Hitler didn't care about anyone's rank, just as long as his views were seen to. However, this method was very well in Hitler's eyes, but when Japan and Germany joined to declare war on the USA, the confusion and disorganisation in the Third Reich was amplified. It may not be the reason for the collapse of the Nazi regime but it would have played a huge part within it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To What Extent was fear of the Gestapo and the SS the main reason ...

    4 star(s)

    The Nazis Plans for peasants and small farmers were that they wrote off debts for them and made the Reich Food Estate and the Reich Entailed Law which gave security to farmers and supervised agricultural production and wages for the farmers.

  2. Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?

    This consideration was best illustrated on the boycott of 1933 that was limited to just one day because of this concern. Hitler also had to take caution over the economy and had to follow the conservative policies of Schacht, even though Hitler wanted greater emphasis on putting Germany on a war footing.

  1. The Rise and Fall of Adolf Hitler.

    He wrote how he would "settle" with the Jews. Hitler was determined to make Europe, "Jew-Free." During WWII he slaughtered over 5 million Jews. Hitler called this plan the New Order. He believed the Germans were the master race, and the Jews were undesirable elements.

  2. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    Otherwise I can't be creative... I have no interest whatsoever in politics, I could never be a member of your party." * She also argued that she was not prepared to work within the Ministry of Propaganda under the control of Goebbels; she had no experience in making documentaries, and was not a member of the Nazi Party.

  1. Goebbels was more influential than Himmler. Discuss

    hear and therefore this gave him the power and knowledge to improve his influence amongst. Furthermore his cold-blooded ruthlessness and organisational expense made him one of Hitler's most valued henchmen. This was due to the fact that the SS were good at interpreting the will of the Fuhrer and further enhancing the influence of Himmler.

  2. To what extent do you agree with the view that Hitler was a weak ...

    In some cases several party members could all be arguing different points all in the name of the Fuhrer. "In the twelve years of his rule in Germany Hitler produced the biggest confusion in the government that has ever existed" Although Hitler was the main person who put forward the

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    The areas of strongest Nazi support came were in rural areas of Germany. Although the German economy recovered quickly from hyper-inflation, agricultural prices slumped.5 Food prices had been very high however this had changed and the farmers were unhappy that they were suffering when it seemed that others were doing well and therefore they turned to the Nazis.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    But renewed political maneuvering led indirectly to the salvation of the Nazi movement and to the appointment of Hitler as chancellor. Hitler Moves West The German Generals had put to good use the "Twenty-Years-Armistice" since 1918. They brooded over their defeat in 1918 and studied its causes carefully.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work