• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Can The Establishment Of The Crusader States From 1099 1118 Be Attributed To The Leadership Of Tancred And Baldwin I?

Extracts from this document...


Ben Jacques ________________ To What Extent Can The Establishment Of The Crusader States From 1099 ? 1118 Be Attributed To The Leadership Of Tancred And Baldwin I The Crusader States were a true sign that the first crusade had been a success, against all the odds the Franks had captured the holy land and kept it safe from Muslim attackers. The fact that the States survived for so long with a fraction of the force they had is also surprising, their establishment can be attributed to a number of factors such as the leadership of Tancred and Baldwin I, Muslim disunity, military superioirity. Baldwin and Tancred were both leaders of the crusaders at a greatly prosperous time. They defeated attacks from both of the Muslim factions numerous times and were great commanders and kept the crusader state safe from attack. For example the battles of Ramlah show how Baldwin was able to defeat a much larger Muslim force in defence of Jerusalem and the other crusader states. ...read more.


The two leaders were strong however they had weaknesses; they were successful in keeping the Crusader States safe in times of crisis however they tended to slip into complacency when there was no apparent threat. Their knowledge from previous battles was invaluable to keeping the Crusader States safe from danger and prosper. Muslim disunity is a major factor for the success of the Crusader States. The Crusader States were always under attack from the Muslims but never from one unified army. If the Muslims had put aside their differences to fight their common enemy then they defiantly would have been more successful in defeating the Crusaders however the opposite came to pass with Muslim leaders making pacts with the Crusaders such as Chavli and Damascus. If the Muslims had concentrated their attacks and formed a coalition army like the Crusaders then they would have been more successful however unlike the Crusaders they chose not to cooperate and act separately from each other bringing defeat. ...read more.


They also co-operated well militarily forming coalition armies both to attack and defend for example in Tripoli. The professional knights that the Franks had were highly trained and effective and an army of a few hundred of them could effectively defeat thousands of Turks. The crusaders were good military strategists and used European tactics to their advantage, for example the heavy cavalry charge was used effectively to swing battles in the crusader?s favour. The military competence of the crusaders and their knowledge from previous battles mean that they could effectively protect the crusader states. In conclusion I agree that the knowledge and leadership skills of Tancred and Baldwin lead to the establishment of the crusader states however this is not the only factor for their success, Muslim disunity is a major reason for their survival as was their military competence. If any one of these factors not been present then I do not believe that the Crusader states would have survived during this period. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To what extent was the Third Crusade a defeat for the Latins?

    However Ascalon, which had been the chief bone of contention throughout the various negotiations was to have its fortifications dismantled and returned to Saladin. The treaty had therefore been highly successful for the Latins as it allowed all new conquered lands to be kept and passages into the holy places was granted.

  2. To what extent was strong leadership the main reason for the success of the ...

    Most Crusaders felt more comfortable under the leadership of their Western commanders as there was much distrust between the Crusaders and their Greco-Roman allies. However, there were times when the aid of Byzantium proved to be indispensable. Had Byzantium not extended its hospitality in the first place-by giving supplies and

  1. To what extent did the lack of Muslim unity assist the Crusaders in winning ...

    Then the stronger rulers remained as passive observers, such as that of the situation in which the Fatimids had advanced into Palestine, so the Sunn'i Muslims, as a direct result of Muslim diffractions, did not attack the crusaders so that they would meet with the Shi'ia Muslims in battle, hopefully bringing about their defeat.

  2. To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible ...

    The biggest challenge to the authority of the Provisional Government however was the existence of the soviets, particularly the Petrograd Soviet, and this increased the extent to which they faced an impossible task because it meant that they could not get on with solving the country's problems without worrying about

  1. How important was the discovery of the Holy Lance in the Crusader success in ...

    more important than it seems on first inspection as two months after the relief arrived, a large army commanded by Kerbogha approached the city and it was essential they took the city before it arrived. The breakthrough which enabled the crusaders to finally take the city was due to the

  2. To what extent was superior military leadership the reason for success in the first ...

    It would be some years later that the Muslim world would unite and from that time the crusader states? existence would be constantly under threat. At no other time was the Muslim world so disunited and at no other time were the crusaders so successful and so therefore this reason

  1. To what extent was the military prowess of the Crusaders the main reason for ...

    In the 900's the Abbasid Caliphate controled the middle east and the empire stretched from the borders of India to the Northern coast of Africa. It was well organised and had vast economic resource from eygpt. if the Crusade had been lauched at this time it would surely have been crushed instantly.

  2. To What Extent Does History show that there is no such thing as absolute ...

    Further to this, Tutankhamen unintentionally limited his own power after restoring Ancient Egypt after his father?s reign. By restoring the Egyptian civilization, re-establishing temples his father had banned, Tutankhamen demanded more power from his great accomplishments, however this detracted his powers as he boosted Egyptian cultures, he created peace and alliances whilst changing the religious culture of Egypt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work