• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can Wolseys foreign policy in the years 1512-29 be viewed as a success?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent can Wolsey?s foreign policy in the years 1512-29 be viewed as a success? The 17 years, 1512 to 1529 saw Wolsey put in place a number of Foreign policies. These were implemented, mainly to increase the power and status of Henry within Europe. Wolsey?s main objective was peace and worked diplomatically to create treaties and alliances. The Foreign policy was a success in the fact that Wolsey, as an individual, was a skilled and able administrator and also, through several of his policies, he pleased Henry, as it made him a chivalric king. However, there were also failures to the foreign policy, the policy was not organised and there was a lack of resources for success and also, England was often deserted by allies. Wolsey, being a skilled and able administrator, was an important factor to why his foreign policy was a success. Wolsey played a key part in organizing the successful French campaign of 1513. Although England was initially deserted by Spain, they still won the minor Battle of the Spurs, and gained the territory of two French cities. ...read more.

Middle

An alliance with France, the treaty of Westminster, was therefore necessary as the only legitimate way of creating military conditions in which the Pope would be free to agree to the divorce. As Charles was in control of the Pope, and obviously did not want his aunt, Catherine, to suffer divorce, he did not allow it. The condition of the Treaty of Westminster was that Mary, Henry?s daughter, was presented to the Dauphin of France. The Anglo-Imperial alliance was unorganised because this was an alliance that also had the condition that Mary would be betrothed to Charles V. Now she was promised to both. The Field of Cloth of Gold, in 1520, was unorganised because it did not create alliances, but just gave each nation a chance to show off their wealth (which Henry could ill afford). It also gave the impression to Charles that Henry was siding with the French. However, Wolsey conducted a flexible and reactive foreign policy. Wolsey recognised the need to ally effectively in order to preserve English security and interests. ...read more.

Conclusion

Wolsey stopped trade with the Netherlands, which was the centre of trade for Charles? empire. He banned the English cloth makers from using Dutch markets, but some English merchants were held hostage in retaliation so these efforts failed. Also there was a lot of unrest in English towns as the cloth workers were already hit by a bad harvest. This caused unrest in England and did not even inhibit Charles? dominance over Europe. In conclusion, to a large extent Wolsey?s foreign policy was a failure. Most of the policies set up did not work. The treaty of London and the First French war were a success but again they were only short term. A lack of money, resources and manpower meant that Henry?s aims could not always be achieved. The planning of alliances was disorganised. Wolsey tried to make alliances with both but when something was needed from the country they were not allied with at the time, the situation became very tricky. The alliances and England became so weak that England went on to be left out in the Treaty of Cambrai in 1528 and England was no longer considered as an equal to Charles and Francis. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    the Pope, the new King of France, the King of Spain, the Holy Roman Emperor, and Henry VIII. This was like a modern day EU summit, and was a major diplomatic achievement for the time; a time of constant political upheaval where war had always been considered the answer.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    'In His Domestic Policy Between 1515 and 1529 Wolsey Promised Much But Achieved Little' ...

    4 star(s)

    He played an important role in finance and the Parliament. It was thought that there was not enough money raised to cover finances for wars that would take place, so taxation had to be raised. Due to Henry's expensive foreign policy, normal tax rates would cover the amount of money

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent was British policy in Ireland a success in the years 1868-1886?

    4 star(s)

    It also wouldn't have upset the Church of Ireland much as the existing clergymen and officials were given financial protection for life. It could be seen as a defeat as it gave rise to the idea that home rule could be given and after this much problems were seen as the home rule party really started asking for home rule.

  2. With what success did Wolsey pursue his aims in foreign policy?

    a senior French admiral, therefore his suppression was beneficial to the peace with Scotland. All this evidence would indicate that Wolsey was very successful in his pursuing of peace with France and Scotland and prestige in Europe. However, the results of the treaty were short lived - Louis XII died

  1. TO WHAT EXTENT WAS BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY A SUCCESS IN THE YEARS 1865 TO ...

    Another reason why Gladstone's foreign policy could be judged to be successful was the very fact that it was unpopular. Gladstone did not pander to the demands of the public as Palmerston did and Disraeli would. While Palmerston was an opportunist, seeing foreign policy as a tool to distract the

  2. To what extent can the period of Conservative dominance between 1951-1964 be viewed as ...

    In the period 1951 to 1964 there was uninterrupted full employment with productivity faster than any other period in the century. Total production increased 40 per cent; real average earnings increased 30 per cent. Car consumption increased from 2 to 8 million whilst television saw a rise from 1 to 13 million.

  1. How far can Wolsey's domestic policies be considered a success?

    This misuse of the legal system gave the nobility better reasons to resent him. Another negative of Wolsey?s work in the Star Chamber came from Wolsey?s desire to do a huge amount of administrative work off his own back. Because of the huge workload that Wolsey was taking on and

  2. How successful was Wolseys foreign policy in satisfying the ambitions of Henry VIII in ...

    Henry had a very aggressive policy on France, until he eventually decided on trying to become the peacemaker of Europe. Henry wanted to regain the lost territory in northern France so he could be seen as a Great War lord with visions of honour and glory, but also to challenge Henry V?s title of the last great English warrior.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work