• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did a strong succession mean a strong reign in the years 1066-1189?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did a strong succession mean a strong reign in the years 1066-1189? An analysis of the five king's in question and there ability to cope with rebellions would help elucidate the extent to which a King's reign would be effective. Rebellions had to be dealt with swiftly and effectively in order to safeguard the kings reign. The support of the people of London became paramount especially between the years 1130 and 1135 when this was a vital factor in deciding who would obtain the monarchy. Additionally, the new king would have to seize the treasury and therefore control the kingdoms finances. The concept of iconography was still in existence and was perhaps the most noteworthy method of identifying the new king. This included being crowned publically by a religious figure of high status. The latter is the systematic establishment of these factors within the kings' reign as well as a solid construction of governmental infrastructure. Although a strong succession may have assisted the maintenance of strong reign, perhaps it was the individual qualities of the king himself that determined the way he governed his kingdom that demonstrated a strong reign. Firstly, the suppression of the rebellions, and the complete annihilation of opposition was paramount if a King was to secure and maintain a successful reign. Perhaps the king that encountered the most rebellions was William the conqueror. ...read more.


William I and Henry I were perhaps the most successful rulers in terms of their success with the Church, as they both successfully acknowledged the power and influence of such an institution, seeing fit to heavily involve it within his regime. This was critical as the unwavering support of the church was necessary if they wished to stabilise their regimes in their kingdoms. This is an example of where an embracement of religion led to a strong reign. However, William II's relations with the church can be contrasted to William the Conqueror and Henry I. Rufus' ruthless and avaricious personality alienated and separated divine intervention from his reign. The following succession of Henry I saw an alternation in the relationship between the King and the Church, as he was an effective guardian of the Church, which juxtaposed with the tyrannical features of William II. Deteriorating relations with the church may perhaps be one of the reasons for king Stephen's weak reign. Initially, relations with the Clergy were favourable, as his brother was the Bishop of Winchester and he was formally acknowledged by the Pope who declared his support for Stephen. Consequently, this weakened Matilda's and Geoffrey's claim to the throne, therefore consolidating Stephen's reign. However, later on in his reign Stephens's relations with the Church soured as he offended his brother Henry, as he failed to promote him to the higher and much more prestigious status of the Arch Bishop of Canterbury. ...read more.


By the time he was the monarch, it seems that England was in a state of turmoil. Henry II had to make substantial modifications to English government to ensure that it was running as efficiently as it was under the reign of his grandfather. Such modifications and alterations can be seen in his re-organisation of the Exchequer and the royal finances. He had to organise and demand the co-operation and loyalty from the barons, who experienced unlimited power during the previous king's reign. Through the assizes of Clarendon and Northampton as well as the effective inquest of the sheriffs, Henry II was able to once stabilise the government of England, whilst simultaneously implementing unique an innovative practises of law and order of which the foundations of such mechanisms still exist today. In summary, the evidence suggests that a strong succession did not necessarily symbolise a strong reign. The strength of each king may have been deduced from his personality and his ability to keep other figures of authority content, as well as the ability to maintain a well-organised kingdom and other jurisdictions. Although a strong succession may have had the potential to help establish and maintain a strong reign, what must not be ignored is that in order to successfully and efficiently govern a kingdom, the kings rule must be absolute and he must have the strong, authoritative, dominant personality necessary to achieve such order and stability. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    * Religious - commissioners had provided spark. * Closing monastries had effect on clergy, who would support. * Essentially, Aske created a common grievance - gelled the rebels together, cunning use of name and symbolism. * Social and Economic - religious change gave rise to social hardship, monasteries had secular role to common man and gentry.

  2. Why did William win the Battle of Hastings?

    He had experienence in leadership for example In 1053 he suppressed a revolt led by William of Arques. Whereas some sources claim (however reliability is not certain) that at stamford bridge Harold fell out with his army over a disagreement over distribution over gains.

  1. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    Most of them were situated in the North-Western (Welsh Marshes) region because there were constant revolts in those areas, whereas the South contained fewer since they were less radical. One of the best-known great stone keeps is the White Tower of London, which is still intact, demonstrating the ability to endure centuries.

  2. Religious Concerns solely explain the strong opposition to the Third Home Rule Bill. ...

    This in the long term becomes a victory for the British as the war lasts for four years and Redmond who had been so optimistic in September 1914, quickly became downhearted and it felt like a defeat to him. Bonar Law, the leader of the Conservative Party, was very sympathetic to the Unionist cause in Ireland.

  1. Why Was King Alfred So Great?

    This also in turn aided the formation of an English identity and pride, giving the population a sense of pride that such important books were in their native language. Alfred, a self-educated man, was also determined to spread education and he achieved this largely through the construction of schools.

  2. Strategy in Cortes' conquest of Mexico

    He wrote "having passed six days...in the great city of Tenochtitlan...I considered it essential that its ruler should be placed in my power and not entirely free."16 To this end, Cort�s effectively placed Montezuma under a sort of house arrest.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    For these Italian cities Crusades meant only the transfer of military action from the West Mediterranean to East. The Beginning of Crusades Pope Urbant 2 gave the Start of Crusade on November 26 in Clermont 1095. Urban addressed a huge audience, consisting of several thousand representatives of aristocracy and clergymen,

  2. Why was Luther able to challenge the Catholic Church so successfully in the years ...

    Therefore, the fact his revolt began at a time when society and technology was also changing means it was carried along with the flow of new, revolutionary ideas, which helped his message to be heard by more people. In conclusion, many of these factors link together to produce the same outcome ? that Luther?s revolt was a successful one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work