• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Alexander II deserve his title of the Tsar Liberator

Extracts from this document...


?To what extent did Alexander II deserve his title of the ?Tsar Liberator??? A ?Liberator? is defined in the dictionary as someone who ?sets free, as from oppression, confinement, or foreign control?. That is, an individual who is willing to bring about a change in the way that things operate in order to make life radically more free and, ultimately, easier for everyone under that rule. When he came to the throne, there was a real necessity for such dramatic reform; the main driving point for this was his upbringing. Brought up by a liberal tutor and a love for western culture, it is little surprise that Alexander II was so passionate about reforming Russia. Although often targeted with attempts on his life due to a lack of change, it cannot be denied that he was a Tsar who brought on a great number of reforms; however, whether he deserves such a strong title is indeed debatable. ...read more.


It was not just the serfs that were to see reform; the army was in need of major change. The Russian defeat in the Crimean War highlighted just how unfit the men were. The Tsar reacted by suspending recruitment in 1856, abolishing military colonies, making every man over 20 liable to conscription, and reducing the length of service to a maximum of 20 years. The training and discipline of soldiers was also made more humane and efficient; corporal punishment was additionally removed. Of course, whether this was an example of a true liberator at work is debatable; although it appears that the average Russian man was given more freedom in terms of conscription and dedication to the army, he was still required to partake in 20 years military service. However, the main argument in favour of Alexander being a liberator here is that it was made more humane. This set the men free from the confinement of horrific conditions, and the oppression of the officers, and they were generally freer to get on with their lives. ...read more.


Although such major reforms did improve the intelligence of the young people of Russia, pupils still had to pay for the gymnasia that gave entry to universities, inspectors could order changes to the curriculum, and, most crucially, students began to develop their own ideas of the future of Russia, which led to student riots in St Petersburg in 1861. Nonetheless, the poor were eventually exempted from university fees, thus confirming a new sense of freedom of thinking and of education. Overall, the most ?liberating? reform of Alexander II was education. Although the emancipation of the serfs was vital in securing freedom for the poor, the fact that the education reforms allowed students to gain an insight into how other countries were being led ? thus forming their own opinion of how Russia should be led ? ultimately gave them the freedom that would destroy the Tsar. His reforms may have been liberating; but they either took too long to actually implement or had major flaws that somewhat shadowed what Alexander II was attempting to do. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Both Lenin and Stalin believed in a strong internal state, in which the party had complete control in the running of government. However Lenin did not believe in a creation of a cult of personality as Stalin did, as Stalin established himself as 'the fount of all wisdom'5, this glorification

  2. To What Extent Were the Reforms of Alexander II Intended to Preserve and Strengthen ...

    a new professional class was born, one that became a new intelligentsia and that could challenge the Tsar's power. However, this was just a by product, and if anything it points more to how much of liberator and reformer Alexander was, as he musts have known that this would be the case, that a new intelligentsia would challenge him.

  1. How well does Alexander II deserve his reputation as The Tsar Liberator(TM)?

    Such historians place emphasis on Alexander's liberal education, he had been educated under the supervision of the liberally inclined Romantic poet Vasilii Zhukovskii and between 1835 and 1837 he heard lectures on Russian law from the reforming bureaucrat Mikhail Speranskii.

  2. Free essay

    To What Extent Was The Crimean War A Series Of Accidents? ...

    III "Was much more interested in international prestige and international standing than he was in territorial expansion....and he genuinely wished to avoid war if possible"6. One can counter this observation however, in that to gain this international prestige the threat of war would have to be an option, additionally by

  1. How successful were the attempts by Alexander II to reform Russia?

    railways in Russia extended themselves to 22,000km which was a notable improvement when compared to the 1,100km before the reforms.

  2. To what extent does Chamberlain deserve the title of one of the Guilty Men?

    way they should pull out but to his surprise nobody did anything. He could have been stopped by Britain and France there and then but he wasn't and then his confidence again grew which then encouraged him to make new demands for land.

  1. Did Alexander II deserve the title Tsar Liberator?

    Whilst Alexander II did in theory liberate the serfs they were still bound through the repayment of debt, so he would be unworthy of the title tsar liberator as he never truly released them. In 1864 Alexander II introduced a more modern western style legal system.

  2. Were Alexander IIs reforms successful and did he deserve to be called a Liberator?

    Alexander saw emancipation of the serfs as a method of evolving; serfdom prevented the growth of Russian industry by obstructing free flow of labour and prevented introduction of modern methods of agriculture. Furthermore, Alexander saw from the rising number of peasant revolts that it was wiser to abolish serfdom from a higher power rather than peasants revolting.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work