• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Alexander II deserve his title of the Tsar Liberator

Extracts from this document...


?To what extent did Alexander II deserve his title of the ?Tsar Liberator??? A ?Liberator? is defined in the dictionary as someone who ?sets free, as from oppression, confinement, or foreign control?. That is, an individual who is willing to bring about a change in the way that things operate in order to make life radically more free and, ultimately, easier for everyone under that rule. When he came to the throne, there was a real necessity for such dramatic reform; the main driving point for this was his upbringing. Brought up by a liberal tutor and a love for western culture, it is little surprise that Alexander II was so passionate about reforming Russia. Although often targeted with attempts on his life due to a lack of change, it cannot be denied that he was a Tsar who brought on a great number of reforms; however, whether he deserves such a strong title is indeed debatable. ...read more.


It was not just the serfs that were to see reform; the army was in need of major change. The Russian defeat in the Crimean War highlighted just how unfit the men were. The Tsar reacted by suspending recruitment in 1856, abolishing military colonies, making every man over 20 liable to conscription, and reducing the length of service to a maximum of 20 years. The training and discipline of soldiers was also made more humane and efficient; corporal punishment was additionally removed. Of course, whether this was an example of a true liberator at work is debatable; although it appears that the average Russian man was given more freedom in terms of conscription and dedication to the army, he was still required to partake in 20 years military service. However, the main argument in favour of Alexander being a liberator here is that it was made more humane. This set the men free from the confinement of horrific conditions, and the oppression of the officers, and they were generally freer to get on with their lives. ...read more.


Although such major reforms did improve the intelligence of the young people of Russia, pupils still had to pay for the gymnasia that gave entry to universities, inspectors could order changes to the curriculum, and, most crucially, students began to develop their own ideas of the future of Russia, which led to student riots in St Petersburg in 1861. Nonetheless, the poor were eventually exempted from university fees, thus confirming a new sense of freedom of thinking and of education. Overall, the most ?liberating? reform of Alexander II was education. Although the emancipation of the serfs was vital in securing freedom for the poor, the fact that the education reforms allowed students to gain an insight into how other countries were being led ? thus forming their own opinion of how Russia should be led ? ultimately gave them the freedom that would destroy the Tsar. His reforms may have been liberating; but they either took too long to actually implement or had major flaws that somewhat shadowed what Alexander II was attempting to do. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    This use of ideology led to his unquestionable rule like that experience under the Tsars, but Stalin emphasized separation of the state from the Church, unlike The Tsarist autocratic rule was strengthened by the support from the Russian Orthodox Church.

  2. To What Extent Were the Reforms of Alexander II Intended to Preserve and Strengthen ...

    However, there is reason to belief that these military reforms may just have been to support the Tsar's power and not the people of Russia. Alexander reformed the way the people thought of the army, and made the army something that citizens could be proud of in a move to increase patriotism.

  1. How successful were the attempts by Alexander II to reform Russia?

    the time the serfs were forced to buy land of nobles at extravagant prices they could not afford. In addition to this, all non-state land was given to nobles, maybe to appease their anger at loosing their free labour. This demonstrates Alexander's weak and indecisive character.

  2. How well does Alexander II deserve his reputation as The Tsar Liberator(TM)?

    Several serf-owners were killed by their serfs.."4 Thus showing Alexander II quickly loosing his control over the Russian people, to which he saw the answer in reform. Orthodox historians argue that Alexander chose to embark on reform for the good of the people, to prompt growth in an under-developed country.

  1. Does Alexander II deserve his historical reputation?

    Domestic serfs were given freedom, however, they received no land and found it hard to find new jobs, leading to many serfs being unemployed and in a worse state than they were originally in. Many things had to change as a result of the emancipation of the serfs, seeing as they now had a new 'freedom'.

  2. To What Extent Did Alexander II fundamentally transform Russia?

    Passports caused additional problems as due to this and other effects of emancipating the serfs, other developments that could have taken place in Russia were hampered. While the emancipation of the serfs was a step in the right direction for Alexander II fundamentally transforming Russia, he failed to follow through

  1. Were Alexander IIs reforms successful and did he deserve to be called a Liberator?

    The length of service for conscripts was reduced to six years, followed by nine years in the reserve. The military reserve was subsequently raised from 210,000 to 553,000 by 1970 and the treatment of soldiers became less brutal and more efficient.

  2. Did Alexander II deserve the title Tsar Liberator?

    Whilst Alexander II did in theory liberate the serfs they were still bound through the repayment of debt, so he would be unworthy of the title tsar liberator as he never truly released them. In 1864 Alexander II introduced a more modern western style legal system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work