• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did Commando forces fulfil their aims and contribute to final victory in World War Two? Commandos are often seen as super soldiers, part of a highly trained elite, who are highly effective in what they do. While this may be true of today's Royal Marine Commandos, it is debatable whether the founding Commandos were as effective as propaganda portrays them. Norman Davies and Ronald Atkins both dismiss the idea of Commandos doing any serious damage against the German war machine. Davies argues that "Great play is made in British war mythology of the numerous special service units - the Special Operations Executive, Royal Marines Commandos, parachutists... Yet in the overall wartime scene their activities were extremely marginal - outward evidence of the basic fact that the British Army was incapable of challenging the enemy on an equal footing."1 Atkins agrees with this idea arguing "Most [Commando raids] were no more than pin - pricks, and some proved embarrassing duds". However he concedes that they "sustained British morale in those grim days" and "they were testimony to Churchill's eagerness to attack, even at the most depressing of times, and helped to sustain the British people's determination."2 He also argues that the Commandos (especially the St Nazaire raid which he agrees was "Spectacularly successful") encouraged Churchill's "desire for further adventure"3 when it was necessary to remain practical about what could be achieved with the resources available. However, historians like James Ladd4 argue that the actions carried out by Commando forces fulfilled their missions and that their impact on the war was very real, and was significant enough to shift the war favourably towards the Allies. Other arguments (many of which are provided below) support Ladd; suggesting that Commandos not only fulfilled what they were set up to do, but also had an important role in final victory. David Fraser states that "the Commandos flourished. ...read more.


The dry dock facility at St Nazaire remained disabled for the rest of the war and was only repaired in 1955. The Commandos killed over 550 and wounded 127. At the same time the Commando force suffered large losses with 168 dead and 214 taken prisoners (this figure includes naval personnel). Although the costs of the operation were high in comparison to most Commando operations, one must remember that there were 5000 German troops garrisoned in the town, up against some 248 Commandos and 300 naval personnel. It was also high in casualty rates due to the significantly larger number of Commandos being used on the raid than on most. They achieved the aim and denied the Tirpitz or any of the large German vessels a safe port on the Atlantic coast. One must also remember the fact that the Germans considered this an invincible port. Indeed, Admiral Donitz when he visited the port only weeks before he asked German sailors what would happen should a British Fleet sail up the channel, and their reply was "it is impossible." Donitz replied "Don't be too sure" 19 and as Mountbatten stated defending the plan "The fact that it was considered impossible made it possible, the Germans never will expect it" 20. The Tirpitz would never break out into the Atlantic and never sank or damaged anything in combat. Radar (Radio Detection and Ranging) was one of the key, high-technology battlegrounds of the war. It secured R.A.F. Fighter Command's narrow victory in the Battle of Britain but the Luftwaffe also used radio navigation aids for blind bombing in the Blitz. In 1941 British bombers began to take the war to the heart of Germany forcing the Luftwaffe to develop its own defensive radars. Britain responded with jamming techniques and a private battle, (the "battle of the beams,") developed between top scientists on both sides to gain the advantage. ...read more.


Fraser, And We Shall Shock Them - pg 96 6 Richard Overy, Why The Allies Won - pg 135 7 Peter Harclerode and David Reynolds - Commando - pg 7 8 Churchill, in discussion with Chiefs of Staff, June 1940 9 Chiefs of Staff memo to Churchill, May 1940 10 Churchill as quoted in BBC Documentary - The Greatest Raid of All - This approach is better known as Hit and Run 11 C-in-C refers to Commander in Chief 12 Churchill in a minute of 18th June 1940 13 Ladd, Commandos and Rangers of World War II, pg 230 14 Churchill's memo to Combined Operations, 21st June 1941 - Quoted in BBC Documentary - The Greatest Raid of All. 15 John Keegan - Six Armies in Normandy - pg 121 16 Commandos and Rangers of World War II - pg 38 17 Commandos and Rangers of World War II - pg 39 18 Admiral Tovey was Commander in Chief of the Home Fleet 19 Quoted in BBC documentary - The Greatest Raid of All 20 Quoted in BBC documentary - The Greatest Raid of All 21 General Student was in command of the German airborne forces during World War II speaking to Mountbatten after the end of the War, as quoted in Commandos and Rangers of World War II - pg 40 22 Mountbatten - as quoted in Commandos and Rangers of World War II - pg 40 23 This order included SOE and Resistance fighters. One must remember that a large number of civilians were shot or rounded up in the aftermath of Commando action by Germans believing it to be the work of local resistance organisations. 24 And We Shall Shock Them 25 Royal Marine Boom Patrol Detachment 26 Ladd, Commandos and Rangers of World War II, pg 232 27 John Keegan - Six Armies in Normandy - pg 121 28 Ladd, Commandos and Rangers of World War II, pg 233 ?? ?? ?? ?? Elliot Black 1-8 Commando Personal Study 04/06/2009 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent did victory or defeat in war in the period 1792-1918 depend ...

    then the Danube to envelop the Austrians at Ulm, leading to an Austrian surrender as they were surrounded and could not unite with the Russians. The importance of Napoleon's generalship in relation to tactics should not be undermined as he used different tactics for different battles making predicting the course of attack difficult for the enemy.

  2. Stalins leadership was the most significant reason for the Soviet victory over Germany in ...

    powerful and successful wartime leader and gave him the credit although many other factors did make a significant difference in the outcome. Stalin had centralised the economy before the war via the five year plans and had focussed heavily on industry, meaning that the soviet systems were already ideally suited for war.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    that gave rise to criminal activities on a large scale, he denies that all Germans were collectively guilty of the crimes committed by the Nazis. For crimes one can punish only individuals; a whole nation cannot be charged with a crime."

  2. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    'Haig was a cavalry officer. He did not understand how to fight a war with infantrymen. His one tactic was to attack over and over again, no matter how little was gained or how many died.'9Haig epitomised the way things were in the good old days, but it has become clear that old tactics were a massive problem in the warfare of the time.

  1. Within the context of the period 1869-1914, to what extent was the British take-over ...

    His long harboured ambition of having an "all red route" from the North to the South of the country arguably inspired the British to continue their colonial exploits. However, the difference here is that Rhodes almost single-handily conquered and founded the state of Rhodesia.

  2. 'Stalin's leadership was the most significant reason for Soviet victory over Germany in the ...

    The German ambassador and Krebs both told Stalin, the exact date when Germany would invade; but Stalin ignored them. Therefore when war did break out, Stalin had a mental breakdown. As Pearson states "Stalin's first, most fatal error was not to allow his troops to mobilise in time before impending Nazi disaster".

  1. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    These rallies were key to the dispersion of Nazi propaganda; they almost became a Nazi icon. Speer continued to create and come up with innovative and imaginative designs for the Nazi Party and Hitler, most of which were never built, such as the German Stadium in Nuremberg and the rebuilding

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The GPU (secret police) collected lists of peasant complaints. This alarmed the party. In several areas of the USSR its policies were being defied. The party leadership blamed the influence of ?kulaks? and made a decision in 1926 to destroy the kulaks as a class. How? 1. Taxed more heavily.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work