• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Hitler control anti-semitic policy in the period 1933-9 and to what extent was the policy erratic and improvised

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Homework: Essay Question 'To what extent did Hitler control anti-semitic policy in the period 1933-9 and to what extent was the policy erratic and improvised? The Question outlines the main views regarding the Holocaust and Hitler's actual control/power over the anti-semitic events before World War II and the final solution. The Intentionalist view is that 'Hitler did control anti-semitic policy in the period 1933-39', and that he had planned the Holocaust from the beginning; while the Structuralist view was that he was a weak dictator and his policies were 'erratic and improvised'. They both show opposite sides of the argument (with Synthesis's sharing both), with historians from both perspectives ever since the end of World War II, trying to give the correct & absolute answer. Most if not all Intentionalist historians believe Hitler to be the main force of anti-Semitism in the Nazi movement. ...read more.

Middle

Structuralists (such as Mommsen), believe Hitler was a weak dictator, and deny there was ever a set plan for Nazi anti-Semitism. In 1933, the Boycott of Jewish firms and the Law for the Restoration of the professional civil service show Jewish policy as being not well planned during this time. The aim of the discriminating measures against Jews as late as 1938 was to encourage Jews to leave Germany 'by every possible means'. If the Nazi's had a clear plan of the final solution, why did they then bother with immigrating Jews to places such as Madagascar? The fact that Hitler and the Nazis couldn't decide where to actually emigrate the Jews (Israel, Madagascar or Poland), and then came up the final solution, shows evidence of Hitler without any clear plan, and just responding to the then-current circumstance. ...read more.

Conclusion

For much of the period 1933-9 Hitler had shown that he was prepared to be pragmatic, taking into account internal and external pressures, in pursuing his ends. The marked increase in anti-Semitic activity after 1937 may well have reflected Germany's growing power, Hitler's growing contempt for International opinion and the fact that the Conservative old guard within Germany had gone. Hitler's control during this period can be heavily argued from both intentionalist and structuralist viewpoints; and for this precise reason, Synthesism was the sum up the way Nazi's produced increasingly extreme policies. Hitler's ultimate aim in 1938 was forced emigration; it seems very unlikely that he was considering mass murder. Yet, the radical nature of Nazi anti-Semitism was such that completion of one stage would most often lead to the beginning of another, more radical than before. Whilst the thought of genocide almost certainly entered his mind, it is impossible to prove that his main aim in 1938 was to exterminate all Jew's in Europe. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. This essay will examine the rise of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the Holocaust ...

    Food was scarce and the Jews were made to give up their money and possessions to ensure they did not starve. Ruthless ethnic Germans and Poles capitalized on this by selling food at vastly inflated prices in exchange for whatever valuables the Jews would give them (Rees, L., 2005 pp139).

  2. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    The idea here is that there's actually no way that Hitler wouldn't have had any influence in German politics, to do so would be nonsense. It's factual, however, to state that his power was limited by some means like his lack of control over entities he created, as well the

  1. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    Therefore, Breitman's emphasis on this line may appear to be slightly unfounded. It is clear by the laws and regulations already imposed by the Nazi government that the Jewish financiers could not finance any form of rebellion due to their exclusion from the German economy, where much of their wealth lay.

  2. Assess the view that the Holocaust was mainly a result of a long term ...

    Himmler emphasized an important issue, claiming, "I do nothing that the Fuhrer does not know", showing that leading Nazis were not directed merely by a long term ideal, but consistent short term goals under Hitler's scrutiny. The combination of clarity of initial target and the freedom to react to events

  1. The Holocaust

    The war had had a huge impact on Hitler. He had gone into the war as an aimless failed artist and emerged the other side as a determined man with a sense of purpose. Hitler gained respect and credibility in right wing circles as he had fought bravely during the war, earning the Iron Cross.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    It is hard to say. The opinions of Germans at the time can not really be trusted as there was much violent pressure on the peoples. o Herzstein says propaganda was the most important part of Nazi rule o Mason is more skeptical of the effect of propaganda especially on the working class.

  1. To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

    It may seem that Hitler did have the power to be able to pass his powers on to his Subordinates, however, his personality of being a very temperamental, shows from Joachim Fest, Noakes and Pridham's point of view of Hitlers personality putting a real toll on his government.

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    Gassing also proved to be less costly. Einsatzgruppen (mobile killing units) gassed hundreds of thousands of people, mostly Jews ?In 1941, the SS concluded that the deportation of Jews to extermination camps (to be gassed) was the most efficient way of achieving the "Final Solution".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work