• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Northern resources win the war for the Union?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐To what extent did Northern resources win the war for the Union? The reasons for the Union victory in the American Civil War have been debated as to whether they were internal factors in that the strengths of the union led to the Union defeating the Confederacy, external factors in that it was the failings and weaknesses of the Confederacy that led to Union success or simply inevitable that the Confederacy would always lose against the might of the Union. To assess these arguments, the factors of the industrial and financial might of the Union (resources), the role of Lincoln, Northern fighting qualities, collapse of morale in the Confederacy and the political system in the Confederacy can be looked at. ...read more.


This argument also shows the inevitability theory that the Confederacy would always lose against the Union because ?God favours big battalions? as interpreted by historian Richard Current who also said ?it would have taken a miracle...to enable the south to win?. The Union had a huge industry, with 9 times more industrial production than the South, 26 times more its rifle production and 3 times more its railroad capacity. With these amounts of resources, historian Shelby Foote has highlighted that the Union ?fought with one had behind its back? showing that the Union didn?t even have to utilise all its industrial capabilities in order to defeat the Confederacy. ...read more.


Rather than solely being Northern resources, the role of Lincoln also played a large part in securing a victory for the Union. Lincoln had extraordinary oratory skills meaning he was able to sell his war aims to the Union, one of his greatest speeches being The Gettysburg Address with historian James McPherson even stating that Lincoln ?won the war with metaphor?. Lincoln was a strident decision maker, able to make difficult decisions that would affect the war such as the introduction of the Emancipation Proclamation and utilising war powers to their greatest effect like censorship and suspending the writ of habeus corpus, he managed his cabinet effectively and was able to get the best out of his assembled ?Team of Rivals? as historian Doris Kearns Goodwin put it since it had many of Lincoln?s critics in it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. In considering the development of the USA in the years 1815-1917, how far can ...

    - H. Evans this quote emphasises the fact that it completely transformed their lives into being more isolated and eliminated. However the Indian removal act of 1830, an exclusion of native Americans for them to left permanently free in an area were no one expected white settles to pierce.

  2. Evaluate Gettysburg and Vicksburg

    Again here there are clear differences in motives and strategies, the north at Vicksburg wanted to wait out the campaign and attack smaller numbers of troops where as Lee, and the south, at Gettysburg wanted a full frontal attack that would be over quickly, the north's intentions were also primarily strategic where as the south's was more psychological.

  1. Analysis Of The Gettysburg Address

    Meade and battle commenced. In a decisive Union victory (mostly due to their occupation of Cemetery Hill) the battle ended on July 4, 1863. However both sides suffered heavy casualties totaling nearly 50,000 which were split almost equally between North and South. This horrific battle gave the divided states some common ground.

  2. Why did Reagan win by a landslide in 1984?

    because she has done her nails?? This made a large amount of the American electorate question the effectiveness of having a female vice president. The weakness of the Democrat party?s leadership greatly contributed to the landslide win of the Republicans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work