• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Stalin's security in power rely on terror

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did Stalin's security in power rely on terror? Stalin often held public trials of leading enemies of the state, called Show Trials. Former leaders of the regime were accused of crimes against the government, and in nearly all these cases, they were executed. The proceedings would've been filmed, so they could be used for propaganda, and publicity for these events was maximised using the press. Stalin used the Show Trials also to attack Trotsky. He however, was one of the few who escaped without the death penalty, but Stalin began to regret simply expelling him from Russia, as he was still alive, and therefore still a threat. This shows us that the show trials were important as they allowed Stalin to remove opponents who posed threats to his power, and they also helped him to warn the public as to what could happen to them if they dared to condemn or criticise Stalin. Sergel Kirov was a leading Communist party politician, until he was assassinated in 1934. When collectivisation was proving unpopular, it was suggested that a conciliatory approach may be more appropriate, and it is possible that it was Kirov that put forward these ideas. He therefore posed a threat to Stalin's economic policies, and therefore could provide a reason for ordinary Russians to question his policies. As a result, Kirov was endangering Stalin's popularity as a leader. ...read more.

Middle

Though the right had expressed opposition to much of the Five Year Plan, there was no strong evidence supporting the Troskyite-Rightst Bloc to which members such as Rykov and Bukharin confessed. Bukharin wrote an article entitled "Notes of an Economist", in which he criticised the Five Year Plan, and made it clear that he opposed the economic policies. He was therefore viewed as a threat to Stalin, as his views could affect those of others. This meant Stalin had to have him executed in order to retain security in power. However, it was not only party officials that posed a threat to Stalin's security. The army's criticisms of collectivisation, meant they posed a threat to Stalin, and so in 1937 and 38, thousands of the Red Army were executed. There was a downside for Stalin to the purges also. With the growth of the purges, the role of the secret police also grew, and as a result, their influence on people increased. To ensure they posed no threat, the purgers themselves, were in turn, purged. The purges then extended beyond the party, as ordinary Russians were arrested. The whole population was living in terror, as anyone criticising Stalin was denounced. As a result, people became scared to be critical of Stalin, and so did not pass judgment on him or his policies. This gave him security in power. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin also discouraged religious worship. Increased working hours, and the threat of sacking if work was missed made it hard to attend church, and committees were even set up to weaken religious influence. This was important, as with the decrease of influence from religion, came the increase in influence from Stalin and his policies. The lack of religious influence, and Stalin's control of the media, meant that Russians were only hearing Stalin's ideals, and so would turn more towards his way of thinking, and so in turn, helping to secure his place in power. This I believe is more important than Stalin's alteration of family values, and of his education policies, but still was less effective than the purges. Under Stalin, there were also benefits for some people, and these benefits could be another explanation for his security in power; that many people actually approved of what he was doing. In contrast to Stalin's collectivised farms, his state farm workers received social benefits, and a higher wage. However, these benefits did not apply to many people, and certainly did not affect the majority of Russia in the way that the Great Terror did. Despite the presence of numerous other ways in which Stalin tried to control his power, such as censorship, I believe the most effective, and the most relied upon, was terror. The purges I believe were the most effective way of securing power, as they struck fear into ordinary Russians. Too scared to say anything for fear of death, meant that although many people may have opposed Stalin, nobody dared start a public rebellion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930’s

    He states that Lenin described Trotsky as "not having a clue about politics."4 Pipes also expresses the ideas that Lenin trusted Stalin a great deal and that Stalin was Lenin's right hand man in his final days.5 Although it was not Lenin's wish that Stalin took control of the government,

  2. Were the Armenian killings of 1915 a deliberate act of genocide or a justifiable ...

    The situation escalated when ethnic and sectarian violence spread throughout the country. This brought about economical pressures that spread a great deal of animosity among the Turks because, as mentioned before, the Armenians were seen as synonymous with wealth prosperity.

  1. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    Trotsky does concede that the terror increased in stature daily, but he attributes this to Stalin's attitude by saying 'Stalin is like a man who tries to quench his thirst with salted water'19 A number of those who knew Stalin personally look to his persona to explain the Purges.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    Conditions worsened under Stalin. There was a desperate need for currency to fund rapid industrialisation. With the threat of war present collectivisation was quickly put in place. Historians call this the Great Turn, and some believe that this is the point at which the Soviet Union 'went wrong'.

  1. To what extent were the Stalinist purges simply a way of eliminating his rivals?

    In the mean time, Zinoviev's intervention gave Stalin the time he required to destroy Trotsky's position in The Party's leadership, which he shrewdly achieved by encouraging the Right Wing to attack Trotsky, beginning with putting forward a new slogan- "Socialism in One Country".

  2. Calvin and Knox: Religious Thinker and Religious Politician

    It was then, however, that his father ordered Calvin to change his studies to law, after failing out with local authorities (his father, was subsequently excommunicated). Calvin obeyed and left Paris for Orl´┐Żans (Online: Schaff, p. 1). Similarly, Knox completed his education at the University of Glasgow, however, it is

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    differences he believes that both careers fed off each other even though the two never met. The main differences he encounters are their personalities, Stalin was organised, a master of bureaucracy, sly and cunning with politics whereas Hitler was more charismatic, creative, he hated paper work and was unorganised.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    These were not the only differences between the two potential leaders. The two had a strong dislike for each other, sparked by the differences between them. While Stalin was a bland official, who had reached his position through hard work, Trotsky was a Jewish intellect who had risen to a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work