• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Stalin succeed in achieving his aims for the transformation of the Russian economy?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did Stalin succeed in achieving his aims for the transformation of the Russian economy? Under the NEP, Russia had managed to recover from seven years of warfare, but by the late 1920s Russia had still not been able to develop its economy beyond the level of 1914 and its agriculture was still very backward. Stalin felt that under the NEP, the Russian economy was underperforming and he felt he had to change this as he wanted to modernise Russia and move it forwards to a truly Socialist society. Stalin wanted to transform Russian economy - in order for Russia to be a socialist society there had to be more workers than peasants and the country had to be at industrially advanced. This would mean that the Russian economy, which relied heavily on agriculture, would have to be changed and modernised - industries would have to be developed and Russia would have to become an industrialised country. In 1929 in the 'Great Turn', Stalin introduced the collectivisation of agriculture; this set of policies, along with the Five Year Plans, created the framework for what became known as the Soviet centrally planned economy and transformed the Soviet economy. ...read more.


Russia had managed to industrialise and catch up with the West at a time when much of the Western world was suffering from an economic depression. However, the goods produced were often of a poor quality, as quantity was more important than quality for Stalin. There was also a great deal of wastage, raw materials were wasted and the production of goods was often inefficient. The Five Year Plans often had unrealistic production targets which factories struggled to meet. Another of Stalin's aims was to modernise agriculture and increase productivity through collectivisation. He believed that the peasant-based farming methods used were inefficient and large collectivised state farms would vastly increase production. Stalin needed to carry out the collectivisation of agriculture to finance industrialisation and feed the workers in the cities. Large, collective farms were created, where peasants worked to increase production of grain. This was, to some extent, a success - all agriculture was collective by 1941. By 1939, Russia had reached the same levels of production as 1928 with less peasants working on the farms. Also, farming was modernised, there was increased use of machinery and tractors on the collective farms, which made the work easier. ...read more.


Stalin also aimed to get rid of the last vestiges of Capitalism - this would mean getting rid of the NEP and replacing it with central planning. However, the Russian economy did not become truly Socialist. Wage differentials and bonuses created a privileged class among the workers. The working and living conditions for Russians were still very poor. The system relied heavily on force, in order for the transformation of the Soviet economy to take place. In conclusion, Stalin did partly succeed in achieving his aims for the transformation of the Russian economy. Stalin managed to industrialise and modernise Russia, many new key industries developed and Russia no longer relied solely on agriculture for its economy. The new, collective farms were more efficient than the old farms, the same amounts were produced with less peasants. By the 1940s, there were more workers than peasants and, generally, Russia was a more Socialist society. However, there were limits on this - there was still a small privileged class, and working and living conditions in the Soviet Union were poor. Also, the transformation of the Soviet economy came at a human cost, and many people died as a result of the Great Famine and dangerous working conditions in factories. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    of cannibalism, such as in the Ukraine, where "cannibalism has become a commonplace" (Dalrymple 1964 p262). This entire disaster of famine was 'man-made' as it was directly caused by collectivisation (Dalrymple 1964 p263). Collectivisation also affected the Soviet Union socially in ways other than famine.

  2. Joseph Stalin's Economic Plans. Stalin ended Lenin's NEP and set about achieving modernisation ...

    Millions died in Russia's richest agricultural regions. When the Germans invaded Ukraine in 1941, they were at first made welcome for driving out the Communists. Despite the famine, Stalin did not ease off. By 1934 they were no kulaks left.

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Assessment of Achievements of Alexander II's Reign. As an autocrat, Alexander II recognised it as his duty to rectify a system that had manifestly failed Russia (in the Crimea as well as at home), yet he was uncertain how best to go about the task.

  2. To What Extent Did Stalin Transform The Russian Economy from 1929-1940?

    When Russia was involved in war, Nicholas went to be on the front line. He left his wife, Alexandra, in charge. Alexandra at this point was very close to a man called Rasputin, who 'helped' Alexandra with her decisions. He hindered Russia's economy.


    Paul Adelman suggests "Redmond's alliance with the Liberals in effect came to an end with the formation of the coalition government ... All this played into the hands of extreme Irish Nationalists, who were already waiting in the wings to take advantage of the wartime difficulties of the British government."10

  2. How far do you agree that the collectivisation of agriculture made an essential contribution ...

    use of tractors would result in much higher food production. Furthermore, with Russia nearly at breaking point in terms of food shortages, the decision to collectivise so rapidly was an emergency decision. In addition with mechanised agriculture there would be less demand for peasants to work the land which would

  1. To What Extent Did Stalin Successfully Socialise Russian Society?

    in fact match with the reality of collectivisation and working conditions for the common Russian people, further downsides to Stalin?s adoption of this ideal were that certain high profile Russian artists stopped producing work and so the pool of artists available to Stalin was reduced, additionally artists who refused to follow the states ideals were persecuted, purged or simply murdered.

  2. Stalinism and the transformation of Russia.

    Millions starved to death during the collectivisation process. Countless more were sent to labour camps, where they met a similar fate. Although a pragmatist who exploited others in his rise to power, Stalin had an ideological basis for his vision for the survival of the USSR and at the sixteenth

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work