• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Stalin succeed in achieving his aims for the transformation of the Russian economy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did Stalin succeed in achieving his aims for the transformation of the Russian economy? Under the NEP, Russia had managed to recover from seven years of warfare, but by the late 1920s Russia had still not been able to develop its economy beyond the level of 1914 and its agriculture was still very backward. Stalin felt that under the NEP, the Russian economy was underperforming and he felt he had to change this as he wanted to modernise Russia and move it forwards to a truly Socialist society. Stalin wanted to transform Russian economy - in order for Russia to be a socialist society there had to be more workers than peasants and the country had to be at industrially advanced. This would mean that the Russian economy, which relied heavily on agriculture, would have to be changed and modernised - industries would have to be developed and Russia would have to become an industrialised country. In 1929 in the 'Great Turn', Stalin introduced the collectivisation of agriculture; this set of policies, along with the Five Year Plans, created the framework for what became known as the Soviet centrally planned economy and transformed the Soviet economy. ...read more.

Middle

Russia had managed to industrialise and catch up with the West at a time when much of the Western world was suffering from an economic depression. However, the goods produced were often of a poor quality, as quantity was more important than quality for Stalin. There was also a great deal of wastage, raw materials were wasted and the production of goods was often inefficient. The Five Year Plans often had unrealistic production targets which factories struggled to meet. Another of Stalin's aims was to modernise agriculture and increase productivity through collectivisation. He believed that the peasant-based farming methods used were inefficient and large collectivised state farms would vastly increase production. Stalin needed to carry out the collectivisation of agriculture to finance industrialisation and feed the workers in the cities. Large, collective farms were created, where peasants worked to increase production of grain. This was, to some extent, a success - all agriculture was collective by 1941. By 1939, Russia had reached the same levels of production as 1928 with less peasants working on the farms. Also, farming was modernised, there was increased use of machinery and tractors on the collective farms, which made the work easier. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin also aimed to get rid of the last vestiges of Capitalism - this would mean getting rid of the NEP and replacing it with central planning. However, the Russian economy did not become truly Socialist. Wage differentials and bonuses created a privileged class among the workers. The working and living conditions for Russians were still very poor. The system relied heavily on force, in order for the transformation of the Soviet economy to take place. In conclusion, Stalin did partly succeed in achieving his aims for the transformation of the Russian economy. Stalin managed to industrialise and modernise Russia, many new key industries developed and Russia no longer relied solely on agriculture for its economy. The new, collective farms were more efficient than the old farms, the same amounts were produced with less peasants. By the 1940s, there were more workers than peasants and, generally, Russia was a more Socialist society. However, there were limits on this - there was still a small privileged class, and working and living conditions in the Soviet Union were poor. Also, the transformation of the Soviet economy came at a human cost, and many people died as a result of the Great Famine and dangerous working conditions in factories. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the economic, social and political consequences of the collectivisation of Russian agriculture in ...

    Due to the vast levels of starvation in the rural areas, there was a mass wave of migration, and authorities dealt with this problem by not allowing migration without a passport, something that the rural population had no right to have so were thus forced to remain in their home

  2. HOW DID WORLD WAR ONE CONTRIBUTE TO THE TRANSFORMATION OF IRISH POLITICS 1914-1918?

    However the interception of the "Aud" on the eve of the Rising dealt a major blow to the rebels with the seizure of a consignment of arms. The arrest of Casement after disembarking a German submarine saw him tried, found guilty of treason and subsequently executed.

  1. How far do you agree that the collectivisation of agriculture made an essential contribution ...

    release labour for the new industries which would be developed through the collectivisation. If the people of Russia wanted to move on from the past they would have to give up their land, with collectivisation being a socialist solution for agriculture a socialist state could not be built if the majority of the population were private landowners.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    Stalin and his NKVD (secret police) chief, Beria, used this as evidence of disloyalty by national minorities. Furthermore, the "initial welcome extended by the villages to their believed [Nazi] liberators"10, particularly in the Ukraine and Caucasus regions, fuelled feelings of distrust.

  1. Impact of The Great Famine on Irelands Society, Economy and Politics

    Statistics from Wesley Johnston (2008) show that 30% of people in Ireland spoke the Irish language but by 1961 this had decreased to 24%. It should be noted that the famine was not fully responsible for the culture collapse - the process was already underway by the time the famine hit Ireland, as people learned the English language as a means of bettering themselves.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    associated bodies;" It can be argued that this was the end of dual power almost at its outset because the two entities had combined. Although they were said to represent different interests and social groups, the fact that they had formed a coalition government meant that there was a middle

  1. To What Extent Did Stalin Successfully Socialise Russian Society?

    Therefore whilst art was wholly reborn as a Soviet Socialist form of media it did not spark tremendous social change or belief in Socialism or Communism. However Stalin was able to change artist form and thinking to a highly Socialist demographic but he was unable to use this as a

  2. Stalinism and the transformation of Russia.

    Millions starved to death during the collectivisation process. Countless more were sent to labour camps, where they met a similar fate. Although a pragmatist who exploited others in his rise to power, Stalin had an ideological basis for his vision for the survival of the USSR and at the sixteenth

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work