• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the 1917 October revolution completely change the nature and function of government in the period 1855-1964?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐To what extent did the 1917 October revolution completely change the nature and function of government in the period 1855-1964? Before 1917, Russia was ruled by the tsars where by 1864 the government would consist of Dumas - ruling urban areas- and Zemtsvas - ruling rural areas. In February1917 the Tsars where replaced by liberal who in October 1917 where replaced by the communist rulers. With this change in government rule came a change in ideology and structure as well as changes in the way reform and repression was used, these are changes which I will be discussing. On one hand you can imply that the nature of Russian government changes due to the October revolution in 1917. Pre October 1917 Russian governments had, in some ways, a different ideology in comparison to post 1917 with communist governments. ...read more.


pre October 1917 the government, when ruled by the provisional government, consisted of two organs which was the Provisional government and Petrograd Soviet whereas after October 1917 it consisted of many organs and not just two. The government structure however, was also same in some ways; for example, before the October revolution the government worked with a hierarchy within it similar to after the October revolution. This continuity suggests that there was not complete change in nature of government. You could also suggest that the function of government showed continuity rather than change after the 1917 October revolution. This is as in regard to reform both the tsars and the communist government acted on reform with a nod to democracy, the tsars with the introduction of the Duma and the communists with the introduction of the Supreme Soviet. ...read more.


Overall I believe that the 1917 October revolution changed the nature and function of government in the period 1855-1964 but not completely. This is because evidence has shown that in regards to nature there is change in ideology between pre 1917 and post 1917 and continuity is little with the similarity of paternalistic figures. The function of the government also shows continuity as their reform within the government was very similar with both heading to democracy. However there is also evidence regarding function of the government which shows change as some of the tsar leaders showed very low levels of repression regarding their function whereas the communist government showed high levels of repression, therefore suggesting that the October revolution presented both change and continuity with the nature and function of government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Although some disagree with this view as they understand we could never have predicted the extent to which Stalin employed a 'personal dictatorship'. The democracy strived for during the revolution4 and declined into a dictatorship laced with censorship and nationalism reminiscent of Tsarist autocracy, as only views complementary of the

  2. The 1917 Revolution.

    On 12th February 1917 the members of the Central Workers' Group were arrested by the police, but not before they had issued a call for street demonstrations in Petrograd to coincide with the reassembling of the Duma on 27th February.

  1. Assess the view that Russias communist leaders did less than the Tsars to improve ...

    the Tsarist regime where the urban workers had virtually no access to medical care. Under Alexander II access to education initially improved, in particular through the university reforms and charter for secondary education introduced by Golovin, and improvements were also seen under Nicholas II and Lenin, following the restrictions emplaced under Alexander III.

  2. To what extent did Russia simply exchange one authoritarian regime for another in the ...

    Despite the success of the 1917 revolutions Russia simply switched from one authoritarian regime in tsardom to another in communism. Lenin is constantly argued to be a 'red Tsar', because he was just as autocratic as the Tsars before him, despite not having absolute authority.

  1. How far does a study of the period 1855 to 1956 suggest that, following ...

    A major feature of repression under Stalin was the Gulag - the need to complete projects in the arctic was perhaps a catalyst for its such widespread use, constituting 10-15% of the GNP during his reign. Rigby argues it was fed by Stalin's desire to turn from an oligarchy to

  2. Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful ...

    had dominated peasant life, however once Nicholas II relaxed these controls opposition had enjoyed more success. By contrast, the communists heavily intensified this and even when relaxations were granted, as under Khrushchev, the regime still had a vast degree of control over the Russian people.

  1. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    This shows how there were a few leaders with new ideas and changes to strategy and tactics but they had little impact on the majority of commanders and tactics had little impact on change over most of the period. Haig was a prime example of this, he was a devout

  2. Impact of the Russian revolution - Ideology matters.

    In it he argued that the concentration of production had transformed the capitalism of free competition into monopoly capitalism. The concentration of production also had dramatically increased the socialization of production. Big banks had changed from pure credit institutions into business banks and as such they dominated whole sectors of industry.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work