• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the Boer War mark the decisive change in Britain's control over its empire in the years 1870 to 1980?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did the Boer War mark the decisive change in Britain's control over its empire in the years 1870 to 1980? The Boer War did mark a change in Britain's control over its and empire and it could be seen as one of the first signs that the empire was beginning to weaken. however, it did not mark the decisive change in the strength of the empire and in my opinion there were other events, such as the First World War and the Suez Crisis that were equally if not more important. I think the that the even that marked the most decisive and most important change in Britain's control over its empire was the Second World War, due to the huge changes that came about because of it, most notably its reduction in status from the world superpower to the weakest of the 'big three', and the loss of some of its most important colonies such as India. The Boer War in 1899 produced one of the earliest signs of anti-imperialism from the colonial people. ...read more.


However, in response to the increasing demands for independence, Britain was forced to make concessions to India such as the 1919 Government of India Act which seemed to give Indians more control over their own affairs. In truth, however, the act did not give as much power as it seemed to and Britain generally remained firmly in control of India. 1918 was not the first time Indian nationalism was present however as it had been around since 1909, before WW1. India began to lose value for Britain after the war, particularly as a market for cotton and also as a result of the tariffs India introduced on British goods from 1919. India's value to Britain continued to decline and from 1934 onwards, Britain was faced with the prospect of paying for the Indian army, which had been one of India's greatest assets to Britain. However, WW1, while important, was still not the decisive factor in Britain's loss of control over the empire. No colonies were lost as a result and Britain even gained territory in the form of mandates from the broken up German and Ottoman Empires. ...read more.


Yet, WW2 did not mean the total loss of Britain's empire. It still retained many of its colonies particularly those in Africa, where they followed a policy of 'new Imperialism' rather than decolonisation. However African nationalists were soon influenced by those in India eventually were also granted independence, as they too began to lose value and become costly to maintain. The final event to mark a change in Britain's imperial strength was the Suez Crisis of 1956. The crisis affected relations with the Middle East and lost Britain control of the Suez Canal, previously its most important trade route. However much of Britain's empire was already in decline by this point and while the Suez Crisis highlighted the extent of Britain's loss of control and showed the world, most particularly those African nationalists still fighting for independence, it was not the most important event to cause a change in Britain's imperial power. Overall, WW2 marked the decisive change in Britain's control of its empire as it was at this time that Britain lost its most important colony of India and found its status in the world to weaken dramatically. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was the War Measures act necessary for the October Crisis

    4 star(s)

    The act resulted in 497 people getting arrested, 62 of those were charged and 32 of them without bail. Perhaps if the FLQ did not murder Pierre Laporte the War Measures Act would not be invoked, but if a murder goes un-noticed, after the victim is kidnapped from his own home, then the actions will only escalate.

  2. To what extent did WW1 cause the collapse of Tsarism?

    Furthermore, the 1905 Revolution had developed a mass of strikes and protesting in the Russian cities as they lost faith in the Tsarist state. The matter had not been helped by mutiny of the army. It was estimated more than 400 army units failed to obey orders given to them by their superiors at this stage.

  1. Why Were Some Forms Of Nationalism More Successful Than Others In Achieving Concessions From ...

    his movement, which became a combination of constitutional and revolutionary means to achieve a single aim, which was dubbed the 'New Departure'. Parnell brought into concern the land question in Ireland, and the native peasant's individual right to his own land.

  2. Education in the Middle Colonies

    Its beginnings go back to Rev. William Tennent's so-called "Log College," established in 1727 about twenty miles north of Philadelphia on Neshaminy Creek. Tennent, a graduate of The University of Edinburgh, located in Scotland, was distressed because no institution existed for preparing ministers in the appropriate revivalist evangelical mode of "New Light" Presbyterianism.

  1. The storming of the BAstille was the most significant event in 1789

    Many went on to join the foreign opponents of the revolution, and the Bastille was a significant trigger for this. The humiliation of the king, was heard of over many continents, Gouverneur Morris, who became the US ambassador to France, reported to George Washington; "You may consider the revolution to

  2. The events in India in 1856/7 were caused by the issue of the new ...

    do so which caused a great disturbance and again built tensions between the two groups. ?That it was something more than a Sepoy mutiny but less than a national revolt? Bandyopadhyay: From Plassey to partition. Showing how the main force behind the mutiny was the Sepoys and their feeling about

  1. How effectively did colonial governments respond to the rise of nationalism in Southeast Asia ...

    Though repression can be seen as effective approach to end uprisings led by radicals, no political and military action in reality could effectively suppressed nationalism effectively. Other than that, colonial governments also appeared as consultative appearance that allowed local powers to seemingly make decisions.

  2. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    attacks on pilgrims, and also mentioned the danger to fellow Christians in Byzantium. Then Urban II called on listeners to take up holy deal by promising to everyone who goes into war remission of sins, and to anyone who dies there - a place in paradise.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work