• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the Bolsheviks use terror tacticts in the years 1918-1921 only because of their need to achieve victory in the Russian civil war?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did the Bolsheviks use terror tacticts in the years 1918-1921 only because of their need to achieve victory in the Russian civil war?? The White campaign that opposed the Bolsheviks consisted of mainly Tsarist sympathisers, constitutionalists and the Socialist Revolutionaries. These groups, although all fighting against the Bolsheviks, had different reasons and motives for getting involved. A view which is put forward by the Western Liberals is that the Bolshevik use of terror tactics between the years of 1918 and 1921 was just a continuation and natural extension of the already created Bolshevik coup. Western Liberals say that the Bolsheviks came into power in a minority coup and that nothing really changed significantly in the way that they tried to maintain power from October 1917 to 1924. They claim that this use of terror began at the time of the revolution in 1917 carried on until the Lenin had imposed a total control over the Russian people. This means that the Western liberals argue that the Bolsheviks were not using terror to only win the civil war but were also using it to make Russia an authoritarian state under their rule. ...read more.


They also believed that a successful Bolshevik leadership would 'trump' all use of terror. For example the Bolsheviks employed other methods that lead to victory such as War Communism. The Soviets say that this served a purpose in feeding all the workers and soldiers during the civil war whilst also enabling the Bolsheviks to win it. This view also argues and tries to justify the use of terror against the enemies of the Bolsheviks such as the white guards by claiming that they were just foreign interventionists. They say that these foreign interventionists would have created more harm for Russia politically if the Bolsheviks hadn't defeated them. However, Soviets historians do appear to, in their arguments; play down the amount of terror used by the Bolsheviks during the civil war. We must remember that an enormous 9 million people were killed during the war and only about 500,000 being from the Bolshevik Red army. This ratio for Bolsheviks to opposition is immense and shows just how much terror and repression really was used. ...read more.


So these other revisionists would say that the terror was not a feature of the regime to start off with and that it almost started by accident. Alongside this argument of terror accidentally occurring the revisionists say that Bolsheviks did indeed increase their terror due to the amount of popular support for their regime being drained away during the years of 1917 and 1918. Finally, the Revisionists claim that the Bolsheviks made and an extremely fundamental transition in their tactics as they were no longer liberating but instead oppressing. So, going back to the question on whether the Bolsheviks used terror tactics only because of their need to win the civil war. This is extremely interesting as it seems that the three different views are completely different, but if you look at them closer it is possible to say that it what is needed to answer the question is a mixture of all three. However the Revisionist argument does seem to be the strongest, not only because it has had time to develop and reflect on more present data and information but because it creates a justified and evidential view on the whole use of repression by the Bolsheviks during the civil war. Tom Gunhouse ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    However when the machine gun was used its effect was devastating, in 1884 the first self powered machine gun was developed by Maxim and could fire 500 rounds per minute. It had a colossal impact on colonial wars: Whatever happens, we have got The Maxim gun, and they have not.2

  2. Why Did the Bolsheviks Win the Russian Civil War?

    These commissars were to keep an eye on the officers and make sure what they did was politically correct and in keeping with their policies, and to give useful information to the central powers. Other Bolshevik policies such as the election of officers by soldiers and the soldiers' committees were removed.

  1. How far do you agree that the Bolsheviks won the Civil War of 1918-1921 ...

    These included, Tsarists, Social Revolutionaries and liberals. This lack of unity made it difficult to gain any support of ordinary Russians as the different loyalties were very different. For example, some wanted the Tsar back (monarchists) while others wanted to see the return of the Provisional Government.

  2. Assess the reasons why the Russian Revolution of 1917 ended in victory for the ...

    Moreover, the liberals also agreed it was the harsh condition in Russia that motivates the people to rebel to show their extreme dissatisfaction towards the governments. Therefore, it was the provisional government's numerous mistakes that left them in a vulnerable situation that enables the Bolsheviks to take over them.

  1. How did the Bolsheviks retain power in the crisis years from October 1917 to ...

    He advised his army not to attack, but just to hold their position and not let anything through. The last point was that the Whites did not know what type of government they would install if the Bolsheviks were defeated.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    All of the above evidence combines to provide a positive answer to the first of the questions posed in the "replaceability" model. The three interest groups just considered had very strong incentives to affect the outcome of government policy. In some cases they not unreasonably felt that the direction of policy decisions was a matter of life and death.

  1. The Russian Civil war, 1918-21

    All the factors are extremely important for every regiment stretched the Bolshevik red army even further. Question 3 This piece of writing will discuss how reliable source C is for a historian studying the Russian civil war. Source C is an account of the Bolsheviks Red Terror observed by a British businessman in Russia in 1918.

  2. Why Did The Bolsheviks Win The Civil War?

    Poor peasants with confiscated lands feared that those who wanted to crush the Bolsheviks would force a return of these lands. Many of the officers in the anti-Bolshevik armies favored monarchy and the sanctity of ownership of property. Their announced purpose of warring against the Bolsheviks was to reconvene the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work