• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the Bolsheviks use terror tacticts in the years 1918-1921 only because of their need to achieve victory in the Russian civil war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did the Bolsheviks use terror tacticts in the years 1918-1921 only because of their need to achieve victory in the Russian civil war?? The White campaign that opposed the Bolsheviks consisted of mainly Tsarist sympathisers, constitutionalists and the Socialist Revolutionaries. These groups, although all fighting against the Bolsheviks, had different reasons and motives for getting involved. A view which is put forward by the Western Liberals is that the Bolshevik use of terror tactics between the years of 1918 and 1921 was just a continuation and natural extension of the already created Bolshevik coup. Western Liberals say that the Bolsheviks came into power in a minority coup and that nothing really changed significantly in the way that they tried to maintain power from October 1917 to 1924. They claim that this use of terror began at the time of the revolution in 1917 carried on until the Lenin had imposed a total control over the Russian people. This means that the Western liberals argue that the Bolsheviks were not using terror to only win the civil war but were also using it to make Russia an authoritarian state under their rule. ...read more.

Middle

They also believed that a successful Bolshevik leadership would 'trump' all use of terror. For example the Bolsheviks employed other methods that lead to victory such as War Communism. The Soviets say that this served a purpose in feeding all the workers and soldiers during the civil war whilst also enabling the Bolsheviks to win it. This view also argues and tries to justify the use of terror against the enemies of the Bolsheviks such as the white guards by claiming that they were just foreign interventionists. They say that these foreign interventionists would have created more harm for Russia politically if the Bolsheviks hadn't defeated them. However, Soviets historians do appear to, in their arguments; play down the amount of terror used by the Bolsheviks during the civil war. We must remember that an enormous 9 million people were killed during the war and only about 500,000 being from the Bolshevik Red army. This ratio for Bolsheviks to opposition is immense and shows just how much terror and repression really was used. ...read more.

Conclusion

So these other revisionists would say that the terror was not a feature of the regime to start off with and that it almost started by accident. Alongside this argument of terror accidentally occurring the revisionists say that Bolsheviks did indeed increase their terror due to the amount of popular support for their regime being drained away during the years of 1917 and 1918. Finally, the Revisionists claim that the Bolsheviks made and an extremely fundamental transition in their tactics as they were no longer liberating but instead oppressing. So, going back to the question on whether the Bolsheviks used terror tactics only because of their need to win the civil war. This is extremely interesting as it seems that the three different views are completely different, but if you look at them closer it is possible to say that it what is needed to answer the question is a mixture of all three. However the Revisionist argument does seem to be the strongest, not only because it has had time to develop and reflect on more present data and information but because it creates a justified and evidential view on the whole use of repression by the Bolsheviks during the civil war. Tom Gunhouse ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Into this milieu Lenin had stepped, and had called not only for fraternization with the enemy and a policy of no confidence in the government, but also for an end to any silly talk of unity among the Social Democrats.

  2. Vietnam war

    In return the Vietnamese limited their assistance to the CPK and refused to supply them with arms. In March 1970 while Sihanouk was abroad, a US-backed coup led by General Lon Nol took over government, who used terrible repression that lead to the radicalisation of many Cambodians.

  1. After the second Revolution of October/November 1917, the Civil War took place (1918)-1921). Explain ...

    They were sent by their governments to force Russia back into war against Germany. The British attacked from north towards Petrograd alongside the French and Americans. The French and British attack from the south and west through Crimea and towards the Bolshevik's stronghold.

  2. Assess the reasons why the Russian Revolution of 1917 ended in victory for the ...

    Moreover, the liberals also agreed it was the harsh condition in Russia that motivates the people to rebel to show their extreme dissatisfaction towards the governments. Therefore, it was the provisional government's numerous mistakes that left them in a vulnerable situation that enables the Bolsheviks to take over them.

  1. How far do you agree that the Bolsheviks won the Civil War of 1918-1921 ...

    Not only were there different ideologies between the nationalities and the Whites but also within the white army itself. The White army was disunited with many different groups within it fighting the Bolsheviks for different reasons. These included, Tsarists, Social Revolutionaries and liberals.

  2. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    and formed specifically for offensive action. They generally have high levels of personal initiative and leadership. The majority of their operations during the Second World War were "butcher and bolt"10 raids, following guerrilla warfare principles, though as seen on D-Day they can be used to lead longer lasting assaults alongside conventional forces.

  1. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    and had devastating affects on warfare, in fact it decided every battle it was present, it had a range of 3500 yards so could out fire the Austrian smoothbores. Artillery caused 70% of casualties in the First World War and had ranges of up to 20 miles.

  2. Why Did the Bolsheviks Win the Russian Civil War?

    These commissars were to keep an eye on the officers and make sure what they did was politically correct and in keeping with their policies, and to give useful information to the central powers. Other Bolshevik policies such as the election of officers by soldiers and the soldiers' committees were removed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work