• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the Bolsheviks use terror tacticts in the years 1918-1921 only because of their need to achieve victory in the Russian civil war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did the Bolsheviks use terror tacticts in the years 1918-1921 only because of their need to achieve victory in the Russian civil war?? The White campaign that opposed the Bolsheviks consisted of mainly Tsarist sympathisers, constitutionalists and the Socialist Revolutionaries. These groups, although all fighting against the Bolsheviks, had different reasons and motives for getting involved. A view which is put forward by the Western Liberals is that the Bolshevik use of terror tactics between the years of 1918 and 1921 was just a continuation and natural extension of the already created Bolshevik coup. Western Liberals say that the Bolsheviks came into power in a minority coup and that nothing really changed significantly in the way that they tried to maintain power from October 1917 to 1924. They claim that this use of terror began at the time of the revolution in 1917 carried on until the Lenin had imposed a total control over the Russian people. This means that the Western liberals argue that the Bolsheviks were not using terror to only win the civil war but were also using it to make Russia an authoritarian state under their rule. ...read more.

Middle

They also believed that a successful Bolshevik leadership would 'trump' all use of terror. For example the Bolsheviks employed other methods that lead to victory such as War Communism. The Soviets say that this served a purpose in feeding all the workers and soldiers during the civil war whilst also enabling the Bolsheviks to win it. This view also argues and tries to justify the use of terror against the enemies of the Bolsheviks such as the white guards by claiming that they were just foreign interventionists. They say that these foreign interventionists would have created more harm for Russia politically if the Bolsheviks hadn't defeated them. However, Soviets historians do appear to, in their arguments; play down the amount of terror used by the Bolsheviks during the civil war. We must remember that an enormous 9 million people were killed during the war and only about 500,000 being from the Bolshevik Red army. This ratio for Bolsheviks to opposition is immense and shows just how much terror and repression really was used. ...read more.

Conclusion

So these other revisionists would say that the terror was not a feature of the regime to start off with and that it almost started by accident. Alongside this argument of terror accidentally occurring the revisionists say that Bolsheviks did indeed increase their terror due to the amount of popular support for their regime being drained away during the years of 1917 and 1918. Finally, the Revisionists claim that the Bolsheviks made and an extremely fundamental transition in their tactics as they were no longer liberating but instead oppressing. So, going back to the question on whether the Bolsheviks used terror tactics only because of their need to win the civil war. This is extremely interesting as it seems that the three different views are completely different, but if you look at them closer it is possible to say that it what is needed to answer the question is a mixture of all three. However the Revisionist argument does seem to be the strongest, not only because it has had time to develop and reflect on more present data and information but because it creates a justified and evidential view on the whole use of repression by the Bolsheviks during the civil war. Tom Gunhouse ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    his iron will, single-handedly swung the entire party away from the conciliationist and potentially even defensist policies which it might otherwise have followed. There is no evidence whatever for this point of view, only the vague sentiment that it is difficult to imagine any other explanation for such a dramatic turn-around.

  2. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    For example at the battle of Omdurman in 1898 11,000 Sudanese were killed compared to only 28 British. However machine guns were only used in colonial warfare by the British as many officers refused to use such technology in European warfare: '[refused to] harness and control their killing power'3 When

  1. Vietnam war

    * Linebacker 1- The Shipment of goods through Haiphong and other ports was virtually eliminated. Acoording to estimates, the flow of imports into th north and movement of supplies to the South by September 1972 had been reduced to between 35-50% of what they had been the previous year.

  2. After the second Revolution of October/November 1917, the Civil War took place (1918)-1921). Explain ...

    Soon three separate White armies were marching towards the Bolshevik controlled region. Generals Yudenich and Denikin marched to Petrograd and Moscow, while Admiral Kolchak marched on Moscow from central Southern Russia. The Whites were also supported for part of the war from foreign troops from the USA, Japan, France and Britain.

  1. How far do you agree that the Bolsheviks won the Civil War of 1918-1921 ...

    Not only were there different ideologies between the nationalities and the Whites but also within the white army itself. The White army was disunited with many different groups within it fighting the Bolsheviks for different reasons. These included, Tsarists, Social Revolutionaries and liberals.

  2. Assess the reasons why the Russian Revolution of 1917 ended in victory for the ...

    However, by continuing the war, they had lost the people's supports immediately. This proves that they had little understanding of the harsh and severe conditions in Russia, paving another revolution to occur. Perhaps, the provisional government viewed that it was an obligation to participate as a major power in Europe and most of all, to delay the upcoming election.

  1. Why did the Bolsheviks win the Russian Civil War

    This made communication between the various battlefronts much easier. Trotsky was able to move troops and supplies rapidly to areas under attack. As Commissar for War, he was able to visit the battlefronts in an armoured train, and to take personal command.

  2. The Russian Civil war, 1918-21

    All the factors are extremely important for every regiment stretched the Bolshevik red army even further. Question 3 This piece of writing will discuss how reliable source C is for a historian studying the Russian civil war. Source C is an account of the Bolsheviks Red Terror observed by a British businessman in Russia in 1918.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work