• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the Bolsheviks use terror tacticts in the years 1918-1921 only because of their need to achieve victory in the Russian civil war?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did the Bolsheviks use terror tacticts in the years 1918-1921 only because of their need to achieve victory in the Russian civil war?? The White campaign that opposed the Bolsheviks consisted of mainly Tsarist sympathisers, constitutionalists and the Socialist Revolutionaries. These groups, although all fighting against the Bolsheviks, had different reasons and motives for getting involved. A view which is put forward by the Western Liberals is that the Bolshevik use of terror tactics between the years of 1918 and 1921 was just a continuation and natural extension of the already created Bolshevik coup. Western Liberals say that the Bolsheviks came into power in a minority coup and that nothing really changed significantly in the way that they tried to maintain power from October 1917 to 1924. They claim that this use of terror began at the time of the revolution in 1917 carried on until the Lenin had imposed a total control over the Russian people. This means that the Western liberals argue that the Bolsheviks were not using terror to only win the civil war but were also using it to make Russia an authoritarian state under their rule. ...read more.


They also believed that a successful Bolshevik leadership would 'trump' all use of terror. For example the Bolsheviks employed other methods that lead to victory such as War Communism. The Soviets say that this served a purpose in feeding all the workers and soldiers during the civil war whilst also enabling the Bolsheviks to win it. This view also argues and tries to justify the use of terror against the enemies of the Bolsheviks such as the white guards by claiming that they were just foreign interventionists. They say that these foreign interventionists would have created more harm for Russia politically if the Bolsheviks hadn't defeated them. However, Soviets historians do appear to, in their arguments; play down the amount of terror used by the Bolsheviks during the civil war. We must remember that an enormous 9 million people were killed during the war and only about 500,000 being from the Bolshevik Red army. This ratio for Bolsheviks to opposition is immense and shows just how much terror and repression really was used. ...read more.


So these other revisionists would say that the terror was not a feature of the regime to start off with and that it almost started by accident. Alongside this argument of terror accidentally occurring the revisionists say that Bolsheviks did indeed increase their terror due to the amount of popular support for their regime being drained away during the years of 1917 and 1918. Finally, the Revisionists claim that the Bolsheviks made and an extremely fundamental transition in their tactics as they were no longer liberating but instead oppressing. So, going back to the question on whether the Bolsheviks used terror tactics only because of their need to win the civil war. This is extremely interesting as it seems that the three different views are completely different, but if you look at them closer it is possible to say that it what is needed to answer the question is a mixture of all three. However the Revisionist argument does seem to be the strongest, not only because it has had time to develop and reflect on more present data and information but because it creates a justified and evidential view on the whole use of repression by the Bolsheviks during the civil war. Tom Gunhouse ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the Bolsheviks win the Russian Civil War

    This made communication between the various battlefronts much easier. Trotsky was able to move troops and supplies rapidly to areas under attack. As Commissar for War, he was able to visit the battlefronts in an armoured train, and to take personal command.

  2. The Russian Civil war, 1918-21

    The first line of the source states that the peasants hated the Bolsheviks and would not give them grain. Lenin had given the peasants the land and they were grateful for this. Although they did not really like the Bolsheviks they were scared that if the Whites won Tsarism or something worse might be restored.

  1. Why Did the Bolsheviks Win the Russian Civil War?

    These commissars were to keep an eye on the officers and make sure what they did was politically correct and in keeping with their policies, and to give useful information to the central powers. Other Bolshevik policies such as the election of officers by soldiers and the soldiers' committees were removed.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    To answer the second question, it is best to start by considering some of the individuals won over to Bolshevism in 1917. By October the Bolsheviks had accumulated a large mass of new supporters at all levels of the party organization.

  1. How did the Bolsheviks retain power in the crisis years from October 1917 to ...

    This was the method that Lenin used to retain support and power around the country, where the peasants lived. Lenin's form of government evolved into what was basically a dictatorship, where the army and the Cheka kept control of everything going on.

  2. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    However when the machine gun was used its effect was devastating, in 1884 the first self powered machine gun was developed by Maxim and could fire 500 rounds per minute. It had a colossal impact on colonial wars: Whatever happens, we have got The Maxim gun, and they have not.2

  1. Assess the reasons why the Russian Revolution of 1917 ended in victory for the ...

    However, by continuing the war, they had lost the people's supports immediately. This proves that they had little understanding of the harsh and severe conditions in Russia, paving another revolution to occur. Perhaps, the provisional government viewed that it was an obligation to participate as a major power in Europe and most of all, to delay the upcoming election.

  2. How far do you agree that the Bolsheviks won the Civil War of 1918-1921 ...

    These included, Tsarists, Social Revolutionaries and liberals. This lack of unity made it difficult to gain any support of ordinary Russians as the different loyalties were very different. For example, some wanted the Tsar back (monarchists) while others wanted to see the return of the Provisional Government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work