To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan cause Germany's defeat on the Western Front?

Authors Avatar

To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan cause Germany’s defeat on the Western Front?

  Sean Roberts Form 10E

CCM

        The failure of the Schlieffen Plan did have an effect on the outcome of the war. After it failed, Von Cluck (commander of the German 1st Army) even went as far as saying that though the war would continue Germany would lose, but there were many other factors that contributed to the outcome of the war. The Schlieffen Plan was just one factor in Germany’s eventual defeat in November 1918.

        The Schlieffen Plan was designed in 1905 before the outbreak of war by Count von Schlieffen. Its aim was to draw France into Alsace-Lorraine then hook through Belgium round Paris, capturing ports on the way. This was planned to take six weeks, afterwhich the German forces would advance to the Eastern Front and defeat Russia. Britain, it was assumed, would not join the war even though they had a treaty with Belgium.

        If the Schlieffen Plan had been a success Germany would have won the war but it failed on its main two objectives: a) to stop a war on two fronts and b) to outflank France and defeat them quickly. The consequence of this was a long, attritional war which meant that other nations which Germany envisaged would not be involved, for example America, joined the war. The plan depended on six assumptions: that Russia wouldn’t mobilize for six weeks; Belgium would be quickly overrun and the German army would move rapidly into France; French forces would concentrate on Alsace-Lorraine rather than advance northwards; Britain wouldn’t intervene, despite their treaty with Belgium; the German right-wing would be six times stronger than any other section of the army, it would be enough to hook round Paris and neutralize it forcing the French to come to terms or surrender; France would be defeated in forty-two days, the German forces could then be transferred to the Eastern Front. If one of these did not materialize the plan would be in jeopardy; in the event, four didn’t materialize. The subsequent failure of the Schlieffen Plan was a blow for Germany in terms of the war’s outcome. Although they occupied a large part of France they were fighting against countries with better resources: the British Empire, France and Russia were able to pour millions of men into the war, a reason for Germany’s defeat. The plan was not executed as von Schlieffen envisaged; the right-wing of the German Army was weakened to strengthen the Alsace-Lorraine defences and guard the Eastern Front where Russia had mobilized much quicker than expected. This meant that the German right-wing was too weak to encircle Paris. Belgium put up significant resistance and had even waterlogged their fields to slow the German advance. Britain joined the war and complications inflicted delays on the German timetable. The French saw the danger north and rushed to the River Marne, even taxis were used to transport troops, the Germans were held then forced to retreat and France was safe for the time being.

Join now!

        The consequences of the Schlieffen Plans failure were telling. Along with being drawn into a war of attrition against opponents with better resources Germany’s initial advantage in well-equipped, trained soldiers would be gradually reduced by casualties and the improvement of its opponents, especially Britain. Germany’s allies, particularly Austro-Hungary, were weaker then their opponents in terms of manpower and the introduction of Britain to the war also meant being hit with a blockade by the British Navy which isolated Germany.

        The Schlieffen Plan failure was the reason for no early German  victory but it wasn’t the only cause of Germany’s defeat. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay