• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the First World War contribute to the fall of Czardom in Russia?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'To what extent did the First World War contribute to the fall of Czardom in Russia?' Since the 1905 Revolution, the Czardom continued to decline. The insincerity of the Czar, setting up of Dumas, the rise of revolutionary group and so on had created an explosive situation in Russia. In 1914, Czar Nicolas II decided to enter the First World War in order to rise the prestige and gain support from people, however, it was the fatal mistake ever made by the royal family which acted as a catalyst for the February Revolution. Though at the beginning, the Russian seemed to support to enter the war, military defeats the government's incompetence soon soured much of the population. Maladministration and ineffective economic policies hurt the country financially, logistically and militarily. Russia entered the war unprepared. There was a grave lack of co-ordination between the Ministry of War and the Front. War Industries Committee was formed to ensure that necessary supplies reached the front. ...read more.

Middle

In 1905, though people were discontented by the poor living standard, they were still willing to support the government on certain matters. However, the consequences of entering First World War clearly revealed the inefficiency for the Czarist government, and people could bare no more, thinking that it might be the right time to overthrow the government. According to Sazonov, 'the government was hanging in the air and had no support either from above or below.' The war made the Czar totally discredited and lost all supports. Nonetheless, there were still some factors that contributed to the fall of Czardom in lesser extent. First of all, the insincerity of the Czar in making reforms had disappointed many Russian. In 1905, though the Czar carried out his promise of an elected duma as he announced in the October Manifesto. However, the Fundamental Law he announced later, which gave him the right to dissolve the Duma, had shown that he was not ready to share his power, he remained autocracy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lastly, Nicolas II was an incapable leader. He was deeply influenced by his wife, Czarina Alexandra. After 1906, the Czarina strongly believed an evil monk, Rasputin, who claimed to use magical powers to cure the serious disease suffered by Nicolas son, Alexis. Therefore, Rasputin became the real hand of the government afterwards, especially during the First World War. However, it could not say that this was a major cause of the fall of Czardom, since Rasputin was murdered by nobles in 1916, the situation was no better onwards. Revolution still broke out after a year later. But Czarina Alexandra and Rasputin undoubtedly decreased the regime's prestige and credibility. To conclude, though there were lots of underlying causes that contributed to the fall of Czardom, they only created an explosive time bomb for a revolution. It was the WWI act as a trigger, brought about the people and overthrown the Czardom in 1917 February Revolution. Therefore, WWI is the major cause to the fall of Czardom. Reference: Aspects of European History 1789-1980 --- Stephen J. Lee Mastering Modern European History --- Stuart T. Miller ?? ?? ?? ?? History essay Alexandra Mok 6A 18 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. "To What Extent Were Gorbachev's Policies the Catalyst to the Fall of the USSR?"

    from Pravda, a main soviet newspaper and primary source; Historical factfiles from Encarta encyclopaedia on-line, and certain reports from Jack F. Matlock, Jr., former U.S. Ambassador to the USSR, this also being a primary source; the most important, perhaps, may be considered to be Graeme Gill's "The collapse of a single party system: the disintegration of the CPSU3".

  2. Khrushchev's Decline and Fall.

    Nevertheless the remaining limitations on Khrushchev's power were shown by the fact that Voroshilov remained a full member and Pervukhin a candidate member of the Presidium. Perhaps the most significant event at the Congress was Chou En-lai's speech. in which he renewed the same kind of acknowledgment of Soviet primacy

  1. Causes of WWI.

    Germans also had the first submarines and used them to blockade Britain by sinking British ships. The sinking of Lusitania is the famous example of the submarine warfare during the World War I. The Lusitania had civilians on board, where 100 passengers were American citizens.

  2. American History.

    *Jamestown's Struggle for Survival* - The most concise way to express the first years would be absolutely terrible luck. The colonists faced a myriad of problems, most of which they were not responsible for. For instance... They just happened to arrive during a severe drought.?

  1. How Stable Was the Tsarist Autocracy in 1914?

    So the vast majority of 'middle peasants' were bound together by the Commune and tensions in the village were constantly turned towards a more important enemy- the nobleman. The village had a "common interest, a way of life, and an outlook on life" (Acton).

  2. The Fall of Communism in Russia.

    During this period the public was given a say in the government, albeit an extremely minor one, and the judicial system eased it's aggressiveness allowing a defendant a better chance of defending themselves.

  1. Britain and the First World War

    the enemy used all their reserves, ammunition and provisions, they would collapse. Clark uses a quote which Ludendorff expressed to reinforce his view. Lundendorff describes the British army as 'Lions led by donkeys'. By this Ludendorff meant the soldiers were lead by poor, rigid and narrow minded Generals.

  2. China After World War II

    The strike struggles are economic in character. They gravitate around such questions as wages, conditions of labor, and unemployment. Thus the struggle is in its first, elementary stage. Once production is restored and the currency stabilized, one may expect an elevation of the struggle to the political plane.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work