• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil War? Foreign intervention influenced the outcome of the Spanish Civil War to the extent that it gave the Nationalists the weapons, the soldiers, the military advisers and the economic support to defeat the Republicans. In addition, it led to the formation of the Non-Intervention Committee, which was signed, by Britain, France and the United States. This enabled to Nationalists to keep Germany's and Italy's support although prevented the Republicans from getting international support from other countries except for the International Brigades and Stalin. This means that they were not able to neither buy weapons nor receive troops from other countries, which led to an unbalanced situation between the two fronts. However, there were other causes, which influenced the outcome of the Spanish Civil War such as the First Republic which involved the governments of Zamora and Aza�a, the incoherent aims and philosophies of the Republicans, the ineffective military organization of the Republicans, the lack of good leaders of the Republicans unlike the Nationalists who had Francisco Franco, the different crosscurrents in Spain at that time and the influence of the Church over the people in order to support the Nationalists. Consequently, the leadership of Franco was very important on the outcome of the Civil War because he organized the administration of the militias which helped him to have greater defeats over the Republicans which, combined with the motivation he was always giving, he created an effective movement which was able to take over Madrid in 1939. According to Gallo, Franco was "very competent and determined" although according to Puzzo "his head was a cemetery of dead ideas". ...read more.

Middle

However, these reforms caused opposition from various sides. The Army was resented due to the removal of its ranks, the Church started to defend its traditional values while the landlords resisted the new Agrarian Reform. In other words, all the reforms made during Aza�a's government did not work and were not effective and in any case according to Lee "Aza�a therefore failed to benefit Spain's lower orders and succeeded only in terrifying the privileged." This means that more people started supporting the Nationalists because the Republican government was very unstable and their reforms were not helping the country in any kind of way. It was after the Aza�a's government, where the Nationalist and the Republicans started to consolidate. However, though the Spanish Civil War was separated between the Republicans and the Nationalists, these two groups were composed of other parties, which shared a main aim, although they had different ways of achieving it and different ideas of how they wanted Spain to be ruled. This war, as Lee maintains was "the first major struggle between fascism and communism". On the right there were the Nationalists, which consisted of the Monarchists, Carlists, conservatives, the CEDA and the Falange. The Monarchists aimed in setting up a military-backed monarchy lead by Alfonso XIII, the Carlists aimed in restoring the monarchy under a descendant of Don Carlos Maria Isidro de Borb�n, the CEDA were willing to challenge the government by legal means and not with violence while the Falange aimed in having a dictatorship. Unlike the CEDA, the other parties were willing to use violence and they had as their main aim to overthrow the Republic and replace it with an authoritarian government. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, Germany's, Italy's and the United State's support, enabled the Nationalists to get soldiers, armaments and oil for the aircrafts and tanks to fight the Republicans, which allowed them to fight more effectively, have more victories and finally take over Madrid on March 1939. However, it was not the only factor which led to the outcome of the Spanish Civil War. The leadership of Franco also led to the outcome of the Civil War. In other words, foreign intervention and Franco's leadership complemented each other and these two factors led to the outcome of the Spanish Civil War. This is because, without foreign intervention, Franco would not have been able to defeat the Republicans because he did not have either the necessary amount of armaments nor money. Moreover, without Franco as a leader, foreign intervention would not have been organized, administrated or motivated as well as Franco did, therefore, the Nationalists would have been defeated. Furthermore, the governments of both Zamora and Aza�a contributed to the instability of Spain and the formation of bitter opposition against the Republicans. Aza�a's government finished destabilizing the Spanish political system, which led to the Nationalists taking over the government, which according to Lee "By the time the Assembly was dissolved in January 1936 the Republic had experienced 26 governmental crises, where 72 ministers had served during a period of four and a half years". Finally, the lack of good leaders, the tensions and differences between the inner parties and the bad of organization of the militias within the Republicans, also influenced the outcome of the Spanish Civil War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Spanish Civil War

    Franco's most used strategy was divide and rule, he weakened the power of both the Carlists and the Falange and political rivals within the Nationalist movement by a combination of luck and manipulation until they were both tools for furthering his own political ambitions.

  2. Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the ...

    The foreign policy successes and domestic successes of the regime were exaggerated and made out to be the product of Hitler's single-handed efforts. Appointed Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda and given far reaching powers after 13 March 1933, Goebbels used the press, the radio, the cinema and all

  1. Free essay

    Do you consider military intervention in Africa as successful? Focus on the policies in ...

    brought one of the most war-shattered countries in Africa peace, is a remarkable success. In that success, equally, the UN, and especially ONUMOZ, has had a central role, (Clapham, 1999, p9). However, strangely, that place did not include any major role in the negotiation of the General Peace Agreement (GPA)

  2. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    They were also the most publicised opponent to the Bolsheviks regime during the Russian Civil War; this was due mostly to the Bolsheviks as they wanted to show this perception and traditional soviet or Marxist historians shared this also. "The struggle against the foreign imperialists and the whiteguards lasted for

  1. History of the United States

    of Pennsylvania were among the leaders of the Radical cause. The 14TH AMENDMENT (enacted in 1866; ratified in 1868) made all persons born or naturalized in the country U.S. citizens and forbade any state to interfere with their fundamental civil rights.

  2. What were the causes and consequences of Italy's involvement in the Spanish Civil War?

    By becoming involved in the SCW Italy could go some way to ensuring that Spain would not become communist. As Germany was already showing signs of wanting to become involved and this would also decrease the chances of Spain becoming a communist outlet for Russia as between them they could

  1. Why did civil war break out in Spain in 1936?

    Most of which wanted Spain to return to the Golden Ages of sixteenth century Catholic Spain and were in favour of the Monarchy in order to remain an authoritarian state. This division was highlighted further by a number of pronunciamientos6 and uprisings between the two sides adding to the increased political tension.

  2. Was the civil warinevitable?

    James M. McPherson1 (1988) terms the South's move to leave the union as a "counterrevolution" which they under took in order to preserve their economic system, which they feared would be destroyed by a "revolution" signalled by the election of Lincoln.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work