• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the increase in the persecution of witches in Europe from 1550-1650 constitute an attack on women?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent did the increase in the persecution of witches in Europe from 1550-1650 constitute an attack on women? The witch hunts of the Early Modern Period, which have also been referred to as the Great Witch Craze, were a period of witch hunts that took place across early modern Europe between the 15th and 17th centuries. The period between 1550 and 1650 in particular, witnessed a widespread and concerted effort to discover and eradicate witchcraft, and though estimates vary it is reasonable to conclude that ? at a minimum - 100,000 people were prosecuted for the crime, and some 40,000 were executed for it. Some argue that the increase in the persecution of ?witches? between 1550 and 1650 constituted a persecution of women, I disagree. I believe that although there may have been some misogynistic motivations behind these witch hunts, misogyny was not a consistent motivation across Europe and there were also many other factors involved such as religious and socio-political turmoil, disease and famine. Therefore it would be unfair and illogical to state that the witch hunts were simply a persecution of women when there were so many other contributing factors. From a feminist perspective, it could be argued that because the majority of ?witches? were women, the main motivation behind the witch hunts was misogyny. According to Steven Katz, the witch hunts can be viewed as a case of ?genderised mass murder? because ?the overall evidence makes plain that the growth in the witch craze was inseparable from the stigmatisation of women. Historically the most salient manifestation of the unreserved belief in female power and female evil is evidenced in ?the tight, recurrent by and now nearly instinctive association of women and witchcraft. Though there were male that were labelled as witches, when the witch craze accelerated and became a mass phenomenon after 1500 its main targets, the main victims, were female witches. ...read more.

Middle

They were disturbers of social order; they were those who could not easily cooperate with others; they were aggressive. Witches, like male bullies, were not nice people. From this perspective, the pursuit of witches was no more a persecution of women than the prosecution of killers and mamers was a persecution of men. The parallel is not exact but it is not absurd. The prime interest of authorities at the time was the pursuit of witches. A witch to them was a person who had renounced Christian baptism, given his/her soul to the Devil, and was in conspiracy with other witches to overthrow social order. The purpose of a witch hunt was the prising out of dangerous persons who were enemies of God, the state and the people. The fact that these ideological enemies turned out to be 80 per cent female could have added fuel the misogyny of the age rather than been a direct consequence of it. Despite the long term stereotype, sixteenth century demonologists spent much time puzzling over why women were so much more wicked than men.? (Oldridge, 2002) It is arguable, however, that the example of women attacking each other is an indication of ?internalised misogyny? where women are sexist towards each other and project sexist stereotypes onto each other, but this is something that women still do to this day. Feminists have fought for equality for centuries, yet to this day they still attack each other. The internalised misogyny displayed in these witch trials is still present in the modern world; a comparable example is the ?slut shaming? that has become common behaviour amongst women in the western world. But, this still does not mean that the sole motivation behind the persecution of witches. The fact that women attacked each other may well be an indication of internalised misogyny but there is no evidence that these women were targeted BECAUSE they were women, just that females happened to be the main targets by both men and other women. ...read more.

Conclusion

In contrast, Steven Katz argues from a feminist perspective, but still explores the subject from all angles. He recognises that although the majority of ?witches? were women, these women accounted for a very small proportion of the European population and so it is arguable that the witch craze cannot truly be considered a misogynistic attack on women, because the pattern was not consistent enough across Europe. It is because of Katz?s ability to explore the arguments against his own point of view that I found his work so useful and an interesting contrast to the extreme feminist viewpoint of Barstow. However when arguing against the feminist interpretations I found ?witches and neighbours? by Robin Briggs particularly informative. Briggs argued that regional variations in the gender of prosecuted witches made it difficult to argue that the witch hunts were simply a misogynistic attack. He also notes the role that religious and political turmoil caused by the fall of the Holy Roman Empire and the Protestant reformation. His views were also supported by Thomas and Sibai. What I found most useful about Briggs? work was that while he did not support the feminist viewpoint, he didn?t discount it. He not only recognised that misogyny was a factor that contributed to the increase in witch persecutions, but also tried to explore other events which had taken place at the same time as these trials to understand what could have led to this period of mass murder and scapegoating. When viewing the increased persecutions from a religious stance, I found Hugh Trevor-Roper?s work quite interesting, in particular his arguments based around protestant and catholic conflict. He argued that Catholic states had executed their Protestant minorities, and vice versa. Although I found this argument quite interesting it is quite an old source and for this reason it has not received much support from the more modern historians that I have read. On a whole I did not find any one source more useful than the others, it was the combination of these sources which helped to draw out my argument and come to a logical and educated conclusion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Bismarck's effect on Germany and Europe

    This was intended by Bismarck, for a long war would increase the likelihood that other European nations would intervene. The quick victories in theses wars demonstrated the success of the new Prussian army provided for in the enlarged budgets. Bismarck had skilfully planned the wars month before they began.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The setting up of the Soviets showed that the insurgent masses had alternative ideas about the way that Russia should be governed. This would mean that the people of Russia, conceivably would pay attention to and carry out the decrees of a government which they felt to be legitimate.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    fellow travelers, aided and abetted by foreign racists, who wanted to whitewash Nazi crimes. Even in 1969, the author of the first comprehensive German work on National Socialism, Karl Dietrich Bracher, had to admit the persistence of such ideas, again camouflaged under the guise of "National Opposition," which were widely

  2. To what extent was Gladstone's religion the driving force behind his attempt to 'sabotage' ...

    firmly imperialist 'Beaconsfieldism' that attempted to secure the best outcome for Britain, sentiments that prefigured the practical criticism of mixing religion and politics today. Disraeli and Gladstone held the greatest of contempt for each other in their foreign affairs, each believing the other's policy to be entirely nonsensical and unworkable, attitudes that stemmed from their differing interests.

  1. Despite it all too obvious political and economic failings, in terms of its society ...

    Gropius set out to train artists and craftsmen together in a single school (Bauhaus) directed by an architect. At the time it was seen as a novel and new way to break from the conventional kind of academic training which taught students to become "little Raphael's and pattern designers."(5)

  2. Impact of The Great Famine on Irelands Society, Economy and Politics

    Statistics from Wesley Johnston (2008) show that 30% of people in Ireland spoke the Irish language but by 1961 this had decreased to 24%. It should be noted that the famine was not fully responsible for the culture collapse - the process was already underway by the time the famine hit Ireland, as people learned the English language as a means of bettering themselves.

  1. Calvin and Knox: Religious Thinker and Religious Politician

    Calvin explains that God reached out to him and therefore he knew what needed to be done. Knox first professed the Protestant faith in the year 1545. Although, his mind had been directed to the faith for some time before.

  2. To What Extent was Self-Preservation the Prime Motive of the Catholic Church's subservience to ...

    J R C Wright himself is a Political Historian and a practising Anglican3 and therefore the quote above can be coloured by his religious background. As such there is a possibility that he could be anti-Catholic, but because the source doesn't seem to be unfairly critical of the Church, it is likely this is not the case.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work