To What Extent did the Industrialised Nature of WW1 determine its cause and outcome?

        Before world war one the distinction between soldier and civilian had been very clear, and generally day to day life was unaffected by war overseas. However with advances in communication came a growing sense of national identity. People began to make sacrifices in their home lives in aid of war, and approximately halfway through the first world war came the idea of Total War; the organisation of entire societies socially and economically for war. Because people were proud of their country and had increased access to information, (arguably often deliberately wrong information) governments faced less trouble than might have been thought with conscription. Of course there were demonstrations and protests, but it is fair to say that industrialisation played a key role in providing nations with forces with which to fight the war.

        One of the most obvious ways in which industrialisation affected war was within combat itself. Gone were the days of cavalry charges against relatively ill-equipped opposition, this was combat with the intention of wiping out the enemy as efficiently as possible. A notable development was that of camouflage, with the powers having learned from mistakes in the past in other theatres of combat. Camouflage was not only developed to hide ground forces fro mother ground forces, but also to hide from aerial reconnaissance, another new technique which of course was entirely thanks to industrialisation and the aeroplane.  New weapons were produced and used with great effect. Artillery could be used to attempt to clear enemy lines before an advance on the ground. Gas was used both to produce large numbers of casualties and also to inspire fear in enemy troops, and this is something that is very relevant. World War One was arguably the first war where one could be killed by something without knowing where it had come from, and the fear created with this knowledge was a weapon in itself. High explosives were developed for use in mines under enemy trenches, and were extremely successful. And of course with so many technological advances, combat techniques had to be altered, developed, and in some cases completely scrapped in order to make best use of, and protect against, the new weaponry. Although communications were still relatively primitive in the front line by today’s standards, they were far advanced from anything used before. Telephone wires were used to relay messages to the front. These wires were often destroyed in shelling, and this is another example of a change as a result of technology; leaders had to think laterally about the best ways in which to triumph, rather than simply aiming to kill as many of the opposition as possible.

        Technological advances were extremely significant at sea, with the introduction of weapons such as the submarine, which was to become the centre of the conflict over unrestricted submarine warfare in 1917. The British Navy was instrumental in the war, cutting off Germany’s Navy and naval supply routes, and gradually starving Germany. Arguably this was a major factor in the outcome of the war.

        Never before, or indeed since, have accepted military ideas been so dramatically rocked by conflict. New technology influenced everyone and everything in the war. Perhaps the end outcome of the war would have been the same if these advances had not taken place, but the course of the war was entirely dependent on them. The military world today uses so many of the lessons learned during World War One. Using tanks together in massed attacks, for example, is a common tactic in armies all over the world today, and was learned from the third battle of Ypres, in late July 1917. Industrialisation not only had an effect on the First World War, but indeed the courses and outcomes of countless conflicts since, including the Second World War.